Missouri 2023 2023 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB86 Introduced / Fiscal Note

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:0104H.01I Bill No.:HB 86  Subject:Crimes and Punishment; Criminal Procedure Type:Original  Date:January 4, 2023Bill Summary:This proposal modifies the offense of tampering with electronic monitoring 
equipment. 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026General Revenue($7,916)($19,378)($19,766)Total Estimated Net 
Effect on General 
Revenue ($7,916)($19,378)($19,766)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Total Estimated Net 
Effect on Other State 
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 0104H.01I 
Bill No. HB 86  
Page 2 of 
January 4, 2023
DD:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Total Estimated Net 
Effect on All Federal 
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Total Estimated Net 
Effect on FTE 000
☐ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Local Government$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown) L.R. No. 0104H.01I 
Bill No. HB 86  
Page 3 of 
January 4, 2023
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
§575.205 – Electronic monitoring equipment
Officials from the Department of Corrections (DOC) state section 575.205 is modified to 
include failing to charge or otherwise attempting to disable an electronic monitoring device in 
the list of actions considered as an offense of tampering with electronic monitoring equipment 
and specifies that offense as a class E felony. 
Since this is a new offense, the department will use a standard class E felony response. For each 
new nonviolent class E felony, the department estimates one person could be sentenced to prison 
and two to probation.  The average sentence for a nonviolent class E felony offense is 3.4 years, 
of which 2.1 years will be served in prison with 1.4 years to first release. The remaining 1.3 
years will be on parole. Probation sentences will be 3 years. 
The cumulative impact on the department is estimated to be 2 additional offenders in prison and 
7 additional offenders on field supervision by FY 2026.
C
hange in prison admissions and probation openings with legislation-Class E Felony (nonviolent)
F
Y2024
F
Y2025
F
Y2026
F
Y2027
F
Y2028
F
Y2029
F
Y2030
F
Y2031
F
Y2032
F
Y2033
N
ew Admissions
C
urrent Law
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A
fter Legislation
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
P
robation
C
urrent Law
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A
fter Legislation
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
C
hange (After Legislation - Current Law)
A
dmissions
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
P
robations
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
C
umulative Populations
P
rison
1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
P
arole
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
P
robation
2 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
I
mpact
P
rison Population
1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
F
ield Population
2 4 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
P
opulation Change
3 6 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 L.R. No. 0104H.01I 
Bill No. HB 86  
Page 4 of 
January 4, 2023
DD:LR:OD
# to 
prison
Cost per 
year
Total Costs for 
prison
Change in 
probation 
& parole 
officers
Total cost 
for 
probation 
and 
parole
# to 
probation 
& parole
Grand Total - 
Prison and 
Probation 
(includes 2% 
inflation)
Year 11($9,499)($7,916)0$02($7,916)Year 22($9,499)($19,378)0$04($19,378)Year 32($9,499)($19,766)0$07($19,766)Year 42($9,499)($20,161)0$07($20,161)Year 52($9,499)($20,564)0$07($20,564)Year 62($9,499)($20,975)0$07($20,975)Year 72($9,499)($21,395)0$07($21,395)Year 82($9,499)($21,823)0$07($21,823)Year 92($9,499)($22,259)0$07($22,259)Year 102($9,499)($22,704)0$07($22,704)
If this impact statement has changed from statements submitted in previous years, it could be due 
to an increase/decrease in the number of offenders, a change in the cost per day for institutional 
offenders, and/or an increase in staff salaries.
If the projected impact of legislation is less than 1,500 offenders added to or subtracted from the 
department’s institutional caseload, the marginal cost of incarceration will be utilized.  This cost 
of incarceration is $26.024 per day or an annual cost of $9,499 per offender and includes such 
costs as medical, food, and operational E&E.  However, if the projected impact of legislation is 
1,500 or more offenders added or removed to the department’s institutional caseload, the full 
cost of incarceration will be used, which includes fixed costs.  This cost is $87.46 per day or an 
annual cost of $31,921 per offender and includes personal services, all institutional E&E, 
medical and mental health, fringe, and miscellaneous expenses.  None of these costs include 
construction to increase institutional capacity.
  
DOC’s cost of probation or parole is determined by the number of P&P Officer II positions that 
are needed to cover its caseload.  The DOC average district caseload across the state is 51 
offender cases per officer. An increase/decrease of 51 cases would result in a cost/cost avoidance 
equal to the salary, fringe, and equipment and expenses of one P&P Officer II. 
Increases/decreases smaller than 51 offender cases are assumed to be absorbable.
In instances where the proposed legislation would only affect a specific caseload, such as sex 
offenders, the DOC will use the average caseload figure for that specific type of offender to 
calculate cost increases/decreases.  
Oversight does not have any information contrary to that provided by DOC. Therefore, 
Oversight will reflect DOC’s impact for fiscal note purposes. L.R. No. 0104H.01I 
Bill No. HB 86  
Page 5 of 
January 4, 2023
DD:LR:OD
Officials from the Office of the State Public Defender (SPD) state the expansion of offenses 
under section 575.205 will have an unknown impact on SPD. The additional number of cases 
that would require SPD representation is unknown.
Oversight notes in FY22 the SPD was appropriated moneys for 53 additional FTE. Oversight 
assumes this proposal will create a minimal number of new cases and that the SPD can absorb 
the additional caseload required by this proposal with current staff and resources. Therefore, 
Oversight will reflect no fiscal impact to the SPD for fiscal note purposes. However, if multiple 
bills pass which require additional staffing and duties, the SPD may request funding through the 
appropriation process.
Officials from the Department of Public Safety - Missouri Highway Patrol, the Missouri 
Office of Prosecution Services, the Office of the State Courts Administrator, the Kansas 
City Police Department, the St. Joseph Police DepartmentPhelps County Sheriff’s 
Department assume the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their organization. 
Officials from the St. Louis County Police Department estimate if the department received 100 
cases annually, it would require two hours of booking, two hours of report writing and warrant 
application, and one hour of warrant application review for each case.  Therefore, at five hours 
per case, with an average hourly pay of $46, each case would total $230 (5 x $46).  This equates 
to approximately $23,000 annually. 
Oversight notes the estimated cost for the St. Louis County Police Department; however, 
Oversight is unable to project a statewide cost for police and sheriff's departments for an 
additional crime; therefore, the impact to local governments will be presented as $0 (can be 
absorbed) to an Unknown amount.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions; 
however, other local law enforcement were requested to respond to this proposed legislation but 
did not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the MOLIS database is available upon 
request.
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2024
(10 Mo.)
FY 2025FY 2026GENERAL REVENUECost – DOC (§575.205) Increased 
incarceration costs($7,916)($19,378)($19,766)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
THE GENERAL REVENUE FUND($7,916)($19,378)($19,766) L.R. No. 0104H.01I 
Bill No. HB 86  
Page 6 of 
January 4, 2023
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2024
(10 Mo.)
FY 2025FY 2026POLICE AND SHERIFF’S 
DEPARTMENTS
Cost - (§575.205) Increased labor hours 
to process cases
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
POLICE AND SHERIFF’S 
DEPARTMENTS
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
This bill adds to the offense of tampering with electronic monitoring equipment, failure to charge 
or otherwise disable the electronic monitoring equipment. The bill specifies that the offense of 
tampering with electronic monitoring equipment when a person fails to charge or otherwise 
disables the equipment is a class E felony, unless the offense for which the person was placed on 
electronic monitoring was a misdemeanor, in which case it is a class A misdemeanor.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space. L.R. No. 0104H.01I 
Bill No. HB 86  
Page 7 of 
January 4, 2023
DD:LR:OD
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Attorney General’s Office
Department of Corrections
Department of Public Safety – Missouri Highway Patrol
Missouri Office of Prosecution Services
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Office of the State Public Defender
Kansas City Police Department
St. Joseph Police Department
St. Louis County Police Department
Phelps County Sheriff’s Department
Julie MorffRoss StropeDirectorAssistant DirectorJanuary 4, 2023January 4, 2023