Missouri House Bill HJR37

Missouri 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/4/23
• Refer: 1/25/23
• Report Pass: 2/16/23
• Refer: 2/21/23
• Report Pass: 2/23/23
• Refer: 3/2/23
• Report Pass: 3/6/23
• Engrossed: 3/7/23
• Refer: 3/30/23

Caption

Proposes a constitutional amendment modifying provisions relating to revenue derived from highway users that is deposited into the state road fund

Impact

If enacted, HJR37 would streamline the process by which highway use revenue is managed and directed towards maintaining and improving Missouri's highway infrastructure. The proposed changes are intended to enhance transparency and accountability, as the Department of Transportation would have to report its budget to the General Assembly, mirroring the requirements of other state departments. This could lead to better fiscal oversight and more focused spending on critical transportation projects within the state.

Summary

HJR37 proposes a constitutional amendment aimed at modifying the provisions related to revenue derived from highway users, specifically focusing on how revenues collected from highway usage, including license fees and taxes on motor vehicles, are allocated to the state road fund. The amendment seeks to repeal Section 30(b) of Article IV of the Missouri Constitution and replace it with new language that requires revenue to be deposited directly into the state road fund. This fund would be dedicated to the construction and maintenance of the state highway system, ensuring that these funds are explicitly allocated for their intended purpose.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJR37 appears to be largely positive, with supporters emphasizing the need for sustainable funding for the state's highway infrastructure. Advocates argue that clear budgetary oversight will enhance accountability and visibility of transportation spending. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders about the potential implications of requiring the Department of Transportation to submit its budget to the General Assembly, which could lead to delays in funding for necessary projects. Despite these concerns, the general tone is one of optimism about the potential for improved management of transportation funds.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates around the necessity of amending the constitution versus enacting legislative changes to achieve similar goals. Some critics argue that existing laws could be adjusted without the need for a constitutional amendment, pointing out that this approach might limit the flexibility of the Department of Transportation to adapt funding strategies in the future. The discussion highlights a broader tension between maintaining local control over highway funds and ensuring that state-level oversight is rigorous enough to prevent mismanagement.