Missouri House Bill HR3

Missouri 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/4/23
• Passed: 1/4/23

Caption

Informs the Senate that the House is duly convened, has elected its officers, and is in session ready for consideration of business

Impact

While HR3 itself does not propose any new legislation or amendments to existing laws, its passage signifies an important procedural step in the legislative calendar. The formal recognition of the House's organization allows for the subsequent introduction and deliberation of bills. Moreover, the establishment of leadership positions is crucial for maintaining order and facilitating productive discussions during sessions, influencing the efficiency with which state laws may be enacted or amended during this assembly.

Summary

HR3, introduced by Representative Patterson, serves as a House Resolution informing the Senate that the House of Representatives is duly convened and organized for business in the 102nd General Assembly's First Regular Session. The resolution outlines the structural hierarchy of the House with the elected officers, including the Speaker and Speaker Pro Tempore, establishing the foundation for legislative operations. Such resolutions are typically procedural in nature, setting the stage for further actions within the legislative framework.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR3 is largely procedural, reflecting a general agreement on the importance of organizational rules within legislative assemblies. Members view the resolution as a necessary formality that ensures the House functions properly. Although HR3 does not invoke substantial debate or contention directly, the efficient organization it promotes is viewed positively, as it allows lawmakers to swiftly advance their legislative agenda.

Contention

As a procedural resolution, HR3 does not present significant points of contention or controversy. Its primary function is to affirm the House's organizational structure rather than to introduce policy disputes. However, the selection of leadership positions could subtly highlight underlying political dynamics, setting the tone for future legislative discussions and the prioritization of upcoming bills during the session. Any relevant contention would likely arise in subsequent discussions or legislation rather than this foundational resolution.