COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:1229S.08S Bill No.:CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222 Subject:State Auditor; Boards, Commissions, Committees, and Councils; Business and
Commerce; Cities, Towns, and Villages; Civil Procedure; Construction and
Building Codes; Contracts and Contractors; Counties; County Government;
County Officials; Courts; Easements and Conveyances; Emergencies; Guardians;
Jackson County; Kansas City; Landlords and Tenants; Law Enforcement Officers
and Agencies; Libraries and Archives; Parks and Recreation; Planning and
Zoning; Political Subdivisions; Property, Real and Personal; Public Officers;
Public Records, Public Meetings; Roads and Highways; Saint Louis City;
Taxation and Revenue - Sales and Use; Telecommunications; Sunshine Law
Type:Original Date:May 10, 2023Bill Summary:This proposal modifies provisions relating to political subdivisions.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026
General Revenue*
Unknown or
(Unknown)
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
Total Estimated Net
Effect on General
Revenue
Unknown or
(Unknown)
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
*Oversight assumes the fiscal impact would not reach the $250,000 threshold.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Total Estimated Net
Effect on Other State
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 2 of
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Total Estimated Net
Effect on All Federal
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Total Estimated Net
Effect on FTE 000
☐ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any
of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Local Government$0 or (Unknown) to
Unknown
$0 or (Unknown) to
Unknown
$0 or (Unknown) to
Unknown L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 3 of
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
§§29.005, 29.225, 29.235, 52.150, 374.250, 610.021 – Powers of the State Auditor
In response to a similar proposal from 223 (HB 1175), officials from the Missouri State
Auditor, the Attorney General’s Office and the Department of Commerce and Insurance
each assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations.
Oversight notes that the above mentioned agencies have stated the proposal would not have a
direct fiscal impact on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact on the fiscal note.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions;
however, numerous counties were requested to respond to this proposed legislation but did not.
A listing of political subdivisions included in the MOLIS database is available upon request.
§44.251 – Protecting Missouri’s Small Businesses Act
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (Perfected HCS for HB 1263), officials from the
Office of Administration - Budget and Planning (B&P) noted this proposal would require a
reduction of fees, personal property tax, and real property tax in political subdivisions with
shutdown orders. Qualifying shut down orders must be caused by reasons outside of a business’
control.
Beginning January 1, 2024, any political subdivision with a shutdown order that lasts for at least
21 consecutive days or 45 cumulative days must:
longer.
was closed due to the shutdown order.
This proposal would not:
subdivision.
For shutdown orders that end before June 1
st
, the county assessor must reduce the property tax
liability for all real and personal property located within the boundaries of the shutdown order. L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 4 of
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
The reduction shall be based on the number of days a business was closed due to the shutdown
order. Affected taxpayers must then pay the reduced tax amount by December 31
st
.
For shutdown orders that end on or after June 1
st
, the taxpayer must pay the full property tax
liability by December 31
st
. The county assessor must then provide information on how such
taxpayer may apply for a refund. The taxpayer must apply for a tax refund by January 15
th
. The
county assessor must then calculate the allowable refund amount by February 15
th
and pay all
refund claims by March 15
th
.
B&P notes that Section 44.251.4(2) requires business owners that rent or lease their real property
distribute the property tax savings to all renters and lessors.
B&P further notes that it is unclear whether this proposal would impact state property tax levies,
if there were a statewide shutdown order. B&P also notes that the Blind Pension Trust Fund
levies a $0.03 per $100 assessed value property tax on all real and personal property located
within Missouri.
B&P is unaware of any restrictive public health orders currently in effect. Therefore, this
proposal may have an unknown impact on state and local revenues in the future.
B&P notes the following concerns with the proposed language:
o
were a statewide shutdown order. Section 44.251.2(2) includes orders by the state
within the definition of “shutdown order”.
Therefore, B&P assumes that if there were a statewide shutdown order, state revenues would be
impacted through the reduction in license fees as well as reductions in real and personal business
property.
o
license fees for six months for any shutdown order that lasts less than 180 days.
If a business is closed due to a shutdown order for 22 consecutive days, the
political subdivision must still waive the fees for the full 180 days.
B&P further notes that the last sentence Section 44.251.4(1)(a) allows business license fees to be
prorated, but the language provides no information as to how they may be prorated. B&P
assumes that the license fees may be prorated for the remaining six months (or less depending on
the length of the closure) of the year. B&P further assumes that the license fees may not be
prorated to account for only the days a business was actually closed (if less than six months).
st L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 5 of
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
o
if a taxpayer paid the reduced tax after December 31. It is unclear whether the
taxpayer would be assessed interest and penalties on the reduced tax liability or
on the full tax liability.
o
liable for the full tax amount (amount before reduction) if they pay the tax
liability after December 31st.
st
o
after December 31st. Whether a late payment would disqualify such taxpayer
from receiving a refund, or whether interest and penalties would be assessed on
the full tax liability or the remaining tax liability accounting for the refund
amount.
o
to review and calculate the eligible refund amount for all refund claims within
that county. B&P notes that as of 2019, the median number of businesses per
county was 385 and there were 25 counties with over 1,000 businesses.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (HB 1263), officials from the Jackson County
Assessor assumed this proposed legislation could have a significant negative impact on County
and other taxing jurisdiction’s operations if the County were required to adjust property tax
amounts for days closed due to public health order. This fiscal impact could be measured in the
millions of dollars when applied across all taxing jurisdictions such as school districts and fire
protection districts.
In 2020, Jackson County asked for the closure of all businesses deemed non-essential only after
receiving guidance from the state Department of Health and federal Center for Disease Control
(CDC). As soon as those closure recommendations changed at the federal and state levels,
Jackson County eliminated its closure guidelines. A future national public health or public
safety emergency may require the temporary closure of certain facilities to maintain public
safety. Jackson County and its taxing jurisdictions should not be penalized for acting in the best
interest of public health or safety.
Officials from the City of Kansas City noted this legislation could have a substantial negative
impact of an indeterminate amount.
Officials from the City of Springfield anticipate a potential negative fiscal impact if the City
needs to issue a shutdown order due to a public health emergency.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (Perfected HCS for HB 1263), officials from the
State Tax Commission assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their organization.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero
impact in the fiscal note. L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 6 of
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (Perfected HCS for HB 1263), officials from the
City of O’FallonCity of Claycomo, Cole Camp Ambulance District, and the
County Police Department each assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their
respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (Perfected HCS for HB 1263), officials from the
Department of Social Services assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their
organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (Perfected HCS for HB 1263), officials from the St.
Charles Community College and Kansas City Police Department each assumed the proposal
would have no fiscal impact on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to
the contrary.
For purposes of this fiscal note, Oversight assumes this proposal would not impact the Blind
Pension Fund. If this assumption is incorrect, it could substantially alter the impact provided in
this fiscal note.
Oversight will present an impact on this fiscal note as a $0 (no shutdown order in implemented)
to an unknown loss in revenue to local political subdivisions for the reduced property tax
revenues and the waived business license fees.
§§64.570, 64.820, 65.665, 89.380 & 182.819 – Library Boards and County Planning
Commissions
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (Perfected HCS for HB 986), officials from the City
of Jefferson assumed the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their organization.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero
impact in the fiscal note for these sections.
§67.137 – Moratorium on Eviction Proceedings
In response to a previous version, officials from the Office of the State Courts Administrator
and Department of Commerce and Insurance each assumed the proposal will have no fiscal
impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
In response to a similar proposal from 2022 (SB 1044), officials from the Attorney General’s
Office L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 7 of
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
In response to a previous version, officials from the City of Jefferson assumed there could be a
fiscal impact if a court were to vacate a judgement a municipality has on a property as a result of
the referenced court hearing. If a municipality had to hire an attorney to assist with such a court
action, there could be a small fiscal impact.
In response to a previous version, officials from the City of Kansas City and the City of
Springfield each assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their respective
organizations.
Oversight notes that the above mentioned agencies have stated the proposal would not have a
direct fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information
to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact on the fiscal note for this section.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions;
however, other cities and counties were requested to respond to this proposed legislation but did
not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri Legislative Information System
(MOLIS) database is available upon request.
§§67.145, 70.631, 170.310, 190.091, 190.100, 190.134, 190.142, 190.147, 192.2405, 285.040,
321.225, 321.620, 537.037, 650.320, 650.330 & 650.340 – Telecommunicator First Responders
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SB 46), officials from the Department of
Elementary and Secondary Education, the Department of Health and Senior Services, the
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, the Department of Public Safety – (Fire
Safety, Office of the Director and Missouri Highway Patrol), the Office of Administration,
the Kansas City Police Department, the St. Joseph Police DepartmentSt. Louis County
Police Department, and the Phelps County Sheriff’s Department assumed the proposal would
have no fiscal impact on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note.
Oversight only reflects the responses that we have received from state agencies and political
subdivisions; however, other police and sheriff’s departments, fire protection districts,
ambulance and EMS, schools and LAGERS were requested to respond to this proposed
legislation but did not. A general listing of political subdivisions included in the MOLIS
database is available upon request.
§67.2727 – Meetings of Governing Bodies of Political Subdivisions
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (HCS for HB 1295), officials from Cole County
assumed this proposal would have a fiscal impact of up to $622.18 per meeting. This amount is
based on the compensation of department directors and senior staff members who are required to
attend County Commission meetings, which are scheduled at least weekly. L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 8 of
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
This results in an annual cost of $32,353.36 of staff time that may not be productive. This
number does not include the compensation of any elected officials who may also be required to
attend.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (HCS for HB 1295), officials from the Missouri
Highway PatrolCity of Springfield, the Phelps County Sheriff and the St. Louis County
Police Department each assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their respective
organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight
will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (HCS for HB 1295), officials from the City of
Kansas City and the Branson Police Department each assumed the proposal will have no fiscal
impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions;
however, other cities, counties and local law enforcement agencies were requested to respond to
this proposed legislation but did not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri
Legislative Information System (MOLIS) database is available upon request.
Oversight assumes this proposal sets out requirements by July 1, 2024, for local political
subdivisions (LPS) to adopt a meeting speaker policies to ensure certain requirements of the
proposal are followed at each meeting of the governing body of the LPS. Oversight assumes the
local political subdivisions could absorb any additional costs related to this proposal. If multiple
bills pass which require additional staffing and duties at substantial costs, LPS could request
funding through the appropriation process.Therefore, Oversight will reflect no fiscal impact
from this proposal.
§67.5122 – Small Wireless Facilities
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SS for SB 152), officials from the Department of
Commerce and Insurance, City of Kansas City and City of Springfield each assumed the
proposal would have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have
any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note.
§79.235 – Residency Requirements for Cities of the Fourth Classification
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (HB 516), officials from the Department of
Economic DevelopmentDepartment of Natural Resources, the Missouri Ethics
Commission, Jefferson City, Kansas City, the City of Springfield and St. Louis City each
assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight
does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in
the fiscal note for these agencies. L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 9 of
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
Oversight notes this proposal allows the mayor of a 4
th
class city to appoint a member to a local
board or commission if the prospective appointee owns real property or a business in the city.
Oversight assumes the proposal will not have a direct fiscal impact.
Oversight only reflects the responses that we have received from state agencies and political
subdivisions; however, other cities were requested to respond to this proposed legislation but did
not. A general listing of political subdivisions included in our database is available upon request.
§84.344 – Residency Requirements for Certain Law Enforcement Personnel
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (HB 967), officials from the City of Kansas City
and Kansas City Police Department each assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on
their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary.
Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
§§84.480 & 84.510 – Kansas City Police Department
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (HCS for HB Nos. 640 & 729), officials from the
city of and the Kansas City Police Department (KCPD) each assumed the
proposal would have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have
any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note
for these agencies.
Oversight assumes removing the salary ceiling for the police chief and several officers (see
current annual compensation maximum by rank below) will allow KCPD more flexibility in
hiring/retaining officers.
Police Chief ($189,726)
Lieutenant Colonels ($146,124)
Majors ($133,320)
Captains ($121,608)
Sergeants ($106,560)
Master Patrol Officers ($94,332)
Master Detectives ($94,332)
Detectives, Investigators and Police Officers ($87,636)
§§162.471 & 162.492 – School Board Vacancies
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (HB 914), officials from the Jackson County
Election Board, Kansas City Board of Election Commissioners, Platte County Election
Board, St. Louis City Board of Election Commissioners and St. Louis County Election
Board each assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero
impact in the fiscal note for these agencies. L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 10 of 22
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
Oversight only reflects the responses that we have received from state agencies and political
subdivisions; however, other local election authorities and schools were requested to respond to
this proposed legislation but did not. A general listing of political subdivisions included in our
database is available upon request.
§182.645 – Dates for the Fiscal Year of Consolidated Public Library Districts
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (HB 437), officials from the Office of the Secretary
of State (SOS) and the Office of the State Auditor each assumed the proposal would have no
fiscal impact on their respective organizations.
Oversight assumes the proposal would not have a direct fiscal impact to public library districts.
Oversight notes according to the SOS’s website there are 12 counties (Cooper, Pettis, Benton,
Johnson, Lafayette, Lawrence, Barry, Jackson, Clay, Platte, Buchanan & Andrew) in the state
that have consolidated public library districts as listed in the chart below: L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 11 of 22
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
§190.327 – Sales Tax for Emergency Services
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (CCS for HCS for SB 186), DOR
provision repeals language regarding the Jefferson County EMG District. Jefferson County
EMG District has a ½% sales tax for emergency services that brought in approximately $11 M in
2022. However, they are allowed up to a 1% sales tax per section 190.335 which is what they
are formed under. It appears that the language in this section doesn’t really impact Jefferson
County and being repealed would not have a fiscal impact. This provision will not fiscally
impact DOR.
Oversight notes this section repeals the provision which provides that a sales tax for emergency
services or for providing central dispatching for emergency services shall not be greater than
one-quarter of one percent in Jefferson County. Therefore, Oversight will present a $0 (no
change in sales tax) to Unknown (increase in sales tax) impact for Jefferson County and a $0 (no
change in sales tax) to Unknown (increase
§190.460 - Prepaid Wireless Emergency Telephone Service Charge
Oversight assumes these changes will have no fiscal impact on state or local government.
§230.205 – Alternative County Highway Commissions
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (HB 1193), officials from the Missouri Department
of Transportation and the Office of the Secretary of State each assumed the proposal would
have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations.
Oversight notes that the above mentioned agencies have stated the proposal would not have a
direct fiscal impact on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact on the fiscal note.
§436.337 – Home Inspections
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (HB 1145), officials from St. Louis City (STL)
noted the Building Commissioner in STL estimates that 30-40% of Housing Conservation
District inspections occur because of a residential property sale. Eliminating the requirement for
these inspections could reduce Building Division revenue by up to $800,000.
Oversight inquired with STL regarding their response. The STL states that their response falls
under two municipal ordinances: 67914 regarding the City Housing Conservation Program and
69202 regarding revised legislation on the City Housing Conservation Program. According to
ordinance 67914, Section 5C:
Upon determining that a dwelling unit has undergone a complete change of occupancy or a sale
of the property as reflected in the Recorder of Deeds Office without first obtaining a Certificate L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 12 of 22
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
of Inspection, the Code Official shall serve notice on the owner of such dwelling unit, by either
first class mail or personal service that a Certificate of Inspection must be obtained within thirty
(30) calendar days of notification or unit will be condemned for occupancy and must be vacated.
Section 8 states:
A. Fees for a Certificate of Inspection prior to occupancy when the application for
inspection is: 1. General inspection of exterior of building and all common areas and
premises plus one dwelling unit is $70.00. Each additional dwelling unit included in the
General Inspection, if inspection is performed within the same building and on a common
date is $25.00 per each additional dwelling unit.
B. The fee for a Certificate of Inspection per unit which is unlawfully occupied shall be as
follows: 1. $110.00 per unit.
Oversight will reflect a $0 or negative unknown for locals.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (HB 1145), officials from the Attorney General’s
OfficeDepartment of Commerce and Insurance, the Department of Economic
Development, the City of Kansas City and the City of Springfield each assumed the proposal
would have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any
information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for
these agencies.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions;
however, other cities and counties were requested to respond to this proposed legislation but did
not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri Legislative Information System
(MOLIS) database is available upon request.
§442.404 - Provisions regarding the Ownership or Pasturing of Chickens
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SB 400), officials from the Missouri Department
of AgricultureDepartment of Economic Development, the Department of Labor and
Industrial Relations, City of Jefferson, Kansas City and the City of Springfield each assumed
the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not
have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal
note for these agencies.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions;
however, other cities and counties were requested to respond to this proposed legislation but did
not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri Legislative Information System
(MOLIS) database is available upon request.
§§475.040 & 475.275 – Pooled Estate Accounts L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 13 of 22
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SB 365), officials from the Office of the State
Courts AdministratorDepartment of Social Services each assumed the proposal
would have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any
information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for
these agencies.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions;
however, counties and county public administrators were requested to respond to this proposed
legislation but did not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri Legislative
Information System (MOLIS) database is available upon request.
Oversight notes §475.275.2(2) of this proposal removes the requirements of a county of a
certain population and opens the examination of accounts to all counties that are pooled for
investing and management of estate funds to be examined on at least an annual basis. The
proposal describes what will be examined and placed into a report which shall be paid by the
county as outlined in §475.275.2(4). Oversight assumes counties could be impacted by this
proposal, but is unclear by how much. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a $0 to negative
unknown fiscal impact to counties for this proposal.
§534.157 – Rental Properties Transfers of Titles
Oversight assumes this section will have no fiscal impact.
Sections 1 – 10 – Conveyances
Section 1 – property in Iron County to MoDOT
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of Administration, the Attorney General’s Office and the
Department of Natural Resources each assumed the proposal would not fiscally impact their
respective agencies.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of the Governor and Missouri Department of Transportation each
assumed the proposal would not fiscally impact their respective organizations.
Oversight notes this proposal conveys small parcels of land from the Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) to the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) for $1 or less.
Oversight assumes the fiscal impact of these transactions between DNR and MoDOT are not
material and, therefore, will not reflect a fiscal impact from these conveyances.
Section 2 – property in Christian County L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 14 of 22
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of Administration (OA) assumed the following regarding this
proposal:
The Office of Administration, Division of Facilities Management, Design and Construction does
not make public appraisal values for property that may be sold or conveyed because public
knowledge of such information may hinder the State’s ability to gain the best value for the
property. Additionally, since the terms of conveyances are yet to be determined, the fiscal
impact, if any, cannot be calculated. Therefore, the fiscal impact is $0 to unknown.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Attorney General’s Office assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact
on their organization.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of the Governor and the Department of Social Services each assumed
the proposal would not fiscally impact their respective organizations.
Oversight notes that the above mentioned agencies have stated this section of the proposal
would not have a direct fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have
any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact on the fiscal note
for these agencies for section 2.
Oversight notes this property may be associated with the Delmina Woods Youth Facility (DSS)
which closed in May of 2019 and is approximately 88 acres according to a report from the Office
of Administration. Oversight cannot tell the size of the parcel from the description in the
proposal. However, as this parcel could be material in size, Oversight will reflect the
transaction of the conveyance of state property in Christian County as 1) a loss of the value of
the state property, 2) the proceeds (if any) of the sale/conveyance, and 3) the annual savings (if
any) to the state no longer maintaining the property. Oversight will assume a net fiscal impact of
less than $250,000.
Section 3 – property in Pike County to MoDOT
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Attorney General’s Office and the Department of Natural Resources each
assumed this section of the proposal would not fiscally impact their respective agencies.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of the Governor and Missouri Department of Transportation each
assumed the proposal would not fiscally impact their respective organizations.
Oversight notes this proposal conveys a parcel of property of land from the state to the Missouri
Department of Transportation (MoDOT) for $1 or less (for land containing 1 8/10 acres more or L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 15 of 22
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
less). Oversight assumes the fiscal impacts of this transaction to OA and MoDOT are not
material and therefore we will not reflect a fiscal impact from this conveyance.
Section 4 – property in the City of Rolla, Phelps County
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of Administration (OA) assumed the following regarding this section
of the proposal:
The Office of Administration, Division of Facilities Management, Design and Construction does
not make public appraisal values for property that may be sold or conveyed because public
knowledge of such information may hinder the State’s ability to gain the best value for the
property. Additionally, since the terms of conveyances are yet to be determined, the fiscal
impact, if any, cannot be calculated. Therefore, the fiscal impact is $0 to unknown.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Attorney General’s Office and the Department of Natural Resources each
assumed this section of the proposal would not fiscally impact their respective agencies.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of the Governor and Missouri Department of Transportation each
assumed the proposal would not fiscally impact their respective organizations.
Oversight notes this property is a fractional part of Lot 119 of the Railroad Addition in Rolla,
Missouri. Oversight is unable to determine the value of the property; therefore, Oversight will
reflect the transaction of the conveyance of state property in Rolla as 1) a loss of the value of the
state property, 2) the proceeds (if any) of the sale/conveyance, and 3) the annual savings (if any)
to the state no longer maintaining the property. Oversight will assume a net fiscal impact of less
than $250,000.
Section 5 – property in the City of Kirksville to the Kirksville R-III school district
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of Administration (OA) assumed the following regarding this
proposal:
The Office of Administration, Division of Facilities Management, Design and Construction does
not make public appraisal values for property that may be sold or conveyed because public
knowledge of such information may hinder the State’s ability to gain the best value for the
property. Additionally, since the terms of conveyances are yet to be determined, the fiscal
impact, if any, cannot be calculated. Therefore, the fiscal impact is $0 to unknown.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Attorney General’s Office assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 16 of 22
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of the Governor assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on
their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note.
In response to a similar proposal from 2022 (SCS for HCS for HB 1597), officials from the
Missouri National Guard (MONG) assumed the proposal would not fiscally impact their
organization.
Officials from the City of Kirksville did not respond to our request for fiscal impact.
As this parcel appears to be material in size, Oversight will reflect the transaction of the
conveyance of state property in Adair County as 1) a loss of the value of the state property, 2) the
proceeds (if any) of the sale/conveyance, and 3) the annual savings (if any) to the state no longer
maintaining the property. Oversight will assume a fiscal impact of less than $250,000.
Section 6 - property in the City of Kirksville
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of Administration (OA) assumed the following regarding this
proposal:
The Office of Administration, Division of Facilities Management, Design and Construction does
not make public appraisal values for property that may be sold or conveyed because public
knowledge of such information may hinder the State’s ability to gain the best value for the
property. Additionally, since the terms of conveyances are yet to be determined, the fiscal
impact, if any, cannot be calculated. Therefore, the fiscal impact is $0 to unknown.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Attorney General’s Office assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact
on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of the Governor assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on
their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note.
Officials from Truman State University did not respond to Oversight’s request for fiscal impact.
Section 7 – property in the City of St. Louis L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 17 of 22
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of Administration (OA) assumed the following regarding this
proposal:
The Office of Administration, Division of Facilities Management, Design and Construction does
not make public appraisal values for property that may be sold or conveyed because public
knowledge of such information may hinder the State’s ability to gain the best value for the
property. Additionally, since the terms of conveyances are yet to be determined, the fiscal
impact, if any, cannot be calculated. Therefore, the fiscal impact is $0 to unknown.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Attorney General’s Office assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact
on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of the Governor assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on
their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note.
Oversight notes this proposal conveys an approximately 7,000 square foot piece of property in
the City of St. Louis. Oversight assumes the fiscal impacts of this transaction to OA is not
material and therefore we will not reflect a fiscal impact from this conveyance.
Section 8 – property in the City of Joplin to the Joplin school district
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of Administration (OA) assumed the following regarding this
proposal:
The Office of Administration, Division of Facilities Management, Design and Construction does
not make public appraisal values for property that may be sold or conveyed because public
knowledge of such information may hinder the State’s ability to gain the best value for the
property. Additionally, since the terms of conveyances are yet to be determined, the fiscal
impact, if any, cannot be calculated. Therefore, the fiscal impact is $0 to unknown.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Attorney General’s Office assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact
on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of the Governor assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 18 of 22
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note.
Oversight notes the property being conveyed to the Joplin School District is approximately one
acre; therefore, Oversight assumes any fiscal impact is not material.
Section 9 – property in the City of St. Louis
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of Administration (OA) assumed the following regarding this
proposal:
The Office of Administration, Division of Facilities Management, Design and Construction does
not make public appraisal values for property that may be sold or conveyed because public
knowledge of such information may hinder the State’s ability to gain the best value for the
property. Additionally, since the terms of conveyances are yet to be determined, the fiscal
impact, if any, cannot be calculated. Therefore, the fiscal impact is $0 to unknown.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Attorney General’s Office assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact
on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of the Governor assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on
their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note.
Oversight notes these parcels of land could contain the Hopewell Center located in St. Louis
City. The facility appears to be vacant and is not listed as a location on the center’s website.
Oversight assumes the conveyance of this property will not result in a material fiscal impact.
Section 10 – property in the City of St. Louis
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of Administration (OA) assumed the following regarding this
proposal:
The Office of Administration, Division of Facilities Management, Design and Construction does
not make public appraisal values for property that may be sold or conveyed because public
knowledge of such information may hinder the State’s ability to gain the best value for the
property. Additionally, since the terms of conveyances are yet to be determined, the fiscal
impact, if any, cannot be calculated. Therefore, the fiscal impact is $0 to unknown. L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 19 of 22
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Attorney General’s Office assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact
on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
In response to a similar proposal from 2023 (SCS for HCS for HB Nos. 802, 807 & 886),
officials from the Office of the Governor assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on
their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note.
Oversight notes the property being conveyed to the city of St. Louis appears to be a lot or lots
located near the Wainwright State Office Building. The property appears to be less than one
acre; therefore, Oversight will not reflect a fiscal impact.
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2024
(10 Mo.)
FY 2025FY 2026GENERAL REVENUE FUNDRevenue – DOR - Potential 1%
collection fee due to local sales tax
increase (§190.327) p. 11 $0 to Unknown$0 to Unknown$0 to Unknown
Sale Proceeds – conveyance proceeds of
the properties (if any) (Sections 1-10) p.
13-19
$0 or
Unknown$0$0
Property value – loss of FMV of the
properties (Sections 1-10) p. 13-19(Unknown)$0$0
Savings – for annual
maintenance/upkeep of properties
(Sections 1-10) p. 13-19
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON
THE
GENERAL REVENUE FUND
Unknown or
(Unknown)
$0 or
Unknown
$0 or
Unknown L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 20 of 22
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State Government
(continued)
FY 2024
(10 Mo.)
FY 2025FY 2026TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITYCost - of acquiring the property from
the state (Section 6) p. 17
$0 or
(Unknown)$0$0
Property increase – acquired property’s
value (Section 6) p. 17Unknown$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT TO
TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITYUnknown $0 $0
FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2024
(10 Mo.)
FY 2025FY 2026LOCAL POLITICAL
SUBDIVISIONS
Revenue – Jefferson County Potential
sales tax increase (§190.327) p. 11
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
Revenue Reduction - Reduction in real
and personal property tax revenues in
the event of a shutdown order (§44.251)
p. 3-6
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
Revenue Reduction - Waiving of
business license fees in the event of a
shutdown order (§44.251) p. 3-6
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
Loss – Cities –Revenues from building
inspection fees done on residential
property for sale (§436.337) p. 11-12
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
Cost - of acquiring the property from
the state (Sections 5 & 8) p. 16, 18
$0 or
(Unknown)$0$0
Property increase – acquired property’s
value (Sections 5 & 8) p. 16, 18Unknown$0$0 L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 21 of 22
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – Local Government
(continued)
FY 2024
(10 Mo.)
FY 2025FY 2026Cost – Counties - of examination of
accounts and preparation of reports done
on estate funds (§§475.040 & 475.275)
p. 13-14
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON
LOCAL POLITICAL
SUBDIVISIONS
$0 or
(Unknown) to
Unknown
$0 or
(Unknown) to
Unknown
$0 or
(Unknown) to
Unknown
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
§44.251 - This proposal could impact small businesses that may be shut down by waiving and
reimbursing business license fees.
§67.137 - Small business landlords could be positively impacted as a result of this proposal.
§436.337 - Small businesses who do home inspections on residential properties for sale could be
impacted as a result of this proposal.
§§475.040 & 475.275 - Small CPA businesses may be impacted in a positive way as a result of
this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
This proposal modifies provisions relating to political subdivisions.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Attorney General’s Office
Department of Commerce and Insurance
Office of the State Auditor
Department of Economic Development
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Department of Health and Senior Services
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations L.R. No. 1229S.08S
Bill No. CCS for HCS for SS for SB 222
Page 22 of 22
May 10, 2023
KB:LR:OD
Department of Public Safety
Office of Administration
Missouri Department of Transportation
Office of the Secretary of State
City of Kansas City
City of Springfield
City of Jefferson
Office of Administration - Budget and Planning
State Tax Commission
Office of the Governor
Department of Social Services
Jackson County Assessor
City of Kansas City
Kansas City Police Department
Phelps County Sheriff’s Department
City of Springfield
City of O’Fallon
St. Charles Community College
City of Claycomo
St. Louis County Police Department
Cole Camp Ambulance District
St. Joseph Police Department
St. Louis City
Cole County
Branson Police Department
City of Jefferson
Julie MorffRoss StropeDirectorAssistant DirectorMay 10, 2023May 10, 2023