Creates the offense of engaging in an adult cabaret performance
The bill's implementation would alter existing state laws related to obscenity and public performance, expanding the definition of illegal adult-themed performances. Under the provisions laid out in SB693, engaging in an adult cabaret performance in a public setting or a place visible to minors amounts to a class A misdemeanor for a first offense. Subsequent offenses could escalate the penalty to a class E felony, demonstrating a stronger legal stance against such performances compared to prior regulations. This preemption of local ordinances is expected to standardize enforcement across the state, which may have significant implications for local businesses that offer adult entertainment services.
Senate Bill 693 seeks to establish new legal definitions and parameters around adult cabaret performances within the state of Missouri. The bill repeals section 573.010 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri and introduces two new sections, including a specific definition of what constitutes an 'adult cabaret'. It stipulates that any performances involving topless or sexually suggestive entertainers, when performed in public spaces or locations visible to minors, will be subject to legal penalties. This places significant restrictions on where such performances can be held, ultimately aiming to protect minors from exposure to adult-themed entertainment.
The sentiment surrounding SB693 appears to be mixed, with supporters advocating for the need to protect minors from inappropriate content in public venues. Proponents argue that the bill reinforces community standards and public morality by restricting adult entertainment visibility. Conversely, critics of the bill express concerns about the potential infringement on freedom of expression and the negative economic impact it might have on adult entertainment businesses. They fear the punitive measures could undermine local economies and restrict adult performers' rights to work, positioning the debate within the broader context of personal freedoms versus societal protection.
Discussions around SB693 highlight notable points of contention in terms of its implications for local governance. The bill's preemptive measures would prohibit local governments from passing their own regulations that are more lenient than state law regarding adult cabaret performances. This centralization of power could exacerbate tensions between state authority and local control, as municipalities may wish to adopt more flexible regulations tailored to community norms. Additionally, there is concern that the broad definitions included in the bill might lead to overreach in enforcement, potentially criminalizing benign performances that do not feature explicit content.