Missouri Senate Bill SJR41

Missouri 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/26/23
• Refer: 2/9/23

Caption

Creates the Joint Committee on State Security

Impact

The passage of SJR41 would amend Article III of the Missouri Constitution, thereby not only embedding the newly created Joint Committee on State Security into the governance framework but also limiting the capacity of certain foreign entities to purchase land in the state. This measure reflects an increasing concern over national security and the influence of foreign governments on local economies. As a result, the amendment would establish stringent regulations that could significantly alter the real estate market dynamics and restrict foreign investment, impacting various sectors and stakeholders in Missouri.

Summary

SJR41, introduced by Senator Rowden, proposes an amendment to the Missouri Constitution aimed at enhancing state security by regulating property acquisition by foreign entities. The resolution seeks to establish a permanent joint committee on state security, composed of ten members from the state legislature, who would have the authority to determine which foreign entities are prohibited from acquiring real properties in Missouri. Specifically, this includes governmental entities and companies from nations identified as adversarial, such as China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia, thereby restricting ownership and enhancing the state's control over land use and foreign investment.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR41 is generally supportive among lawmakers who view it as a necessary safeguard against potential espionage and undue influence from foreign powers in local affairs. Proponents argue that preventing foreign ownership of land is crucial for ensuring the safety and integrity of state resources. On the contrary, some critics express concerns that overly restrictive measures may hinder economic growth and deter legitimate international partnerships, positing that an overly cautious approach could lead to negative economic repercussions.

Contention

Key points of contention have arisen regarding the scope and potential consequences of the proposed amendment. Critics argue that while national security is a valid concern, excessively barring foreign ownership may limit opportunities for investment and partnership in Missouri’s economy. Additionally, questions arise about the criteria and processes that the proposed committee will use to determine which entities are deemed a threat, potentially raising issues of fairness and transparency. Overall, the debate reflects broader national conversations about foreign relations, property rights, and economic strategy.