Missouri 2024 2024 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB1534 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/20/2024

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:3541H.01I Bill No.:HB 1534  Subject:Elections; Ethics Type:Original  Date:February 20, 2024Bill Summary:This proposal modifies provisions relating to qualifications for public office. 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Total Estimated Net 
Effect on General 
Revenue $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Total Estimated Net 
Effect on Other State 
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 3541H.01I 
Bill No. HB 1534  
Page 2 of 
February 20, 2024
BR:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Total Estimated Net 
Effect on All Federal 
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Total Estimated Net 
Effect on FTE 000
☐ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Local Government$0$0$0 L.R. No. 3541H.01I 
Bill No. HB 1534  
Page 3 of 
February 20, 2024
BR:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) note many bills considered by the 
General Assembly include provisions allowing or requiring agencies to submit rules and 
regulations to implement the act. The SOS is provided with core funding to handle a certain 
amount of normal activity resulting from each year's legislative session. The fiscal impact for 
this fiscal note to the SOS for Administrative Rules is less than $5,000. The SOS recognizes that 
this is a small amount and does not expect that additional funding would be required to meet 
these costs. However, the SOS also recognizes that many such bills may be passed by the 
General Assembly in a given year and that collectively the costs may be in excess of what the 
office can sustain with its core budget. Therefore, the SOS reserves the right to request funding 
for the cost of supporting administrative rules requirements should the need arise based on a 
review of the finally approved bills signed by the governor.
Officials from the Kansas City Election Board state they should not be responsible for 
verifying online tax payments because they don’t have access to verify this information.
Officials from the Jackson County Board of Elections, the Platte County Board of Elections, 
the St. Louis City Board of Elections the St. Louis County Board of Elections and the 
Greene County Clerk each assume the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective 
organizations. 
Oversight notes that the above mentioned agencies have stated the proposal would not have a 
direct fiscal impact on their organizations.  Oversight does not have any information to the 
contrary.  Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact on the fiscal note.
Oversight assumes currently candidates for public office are required to attest on their 
declaration of candidacy form, filed with their local election authority, a statement saying they 
are not delinquent in the payment of any state income taxes, personal property taxes, municipal 
taxes, and real property taxes on their place of residence. This proposal appears to require that 
candidates for public office in the City of St. Louis must provide proof of the taxes paid or no-
tax-due statements for each tax listed in addition to the attestation on the declaration of 
candidacy form.  
Oversight notes that Section 115.306.2 (4) states that this subdivision shall only apply to a city 
not within a county’s offices that perform county functions. Oversight assumes that any costs 
arising as a result of this proposal can be absorbed by City of St. Louis with current resources; 
therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact on the fiscal note. L.R. No. 3541H.01I 
Bill No. HB 1534  
Page 4 of 
February 20, 2024
BR:LR:OD
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions; 
however, other local political subdivisions were requested to respond to this proposed legislation 
but did not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the MOLIS database is available upon 
request.
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2025
(10 Mo.)
FY 2026FY 2027$0$0$0FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2025
(10 Mo.)
FY 2026FY 2027$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
The proposed legislation appears to have no direct fiscal impact.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of the Secretary of State
Jackson County Board of Elections
Kansas City Election Board
Platte County Board of Elections
St. Louis City Board of Elections
St. Louis County Board of Elections
Greene County Clerk
Julie MorffRoss StropeDirectorAssistant DirectorFebruary 20, 2024February 20, 2024