Missouri 2024 2024 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB1652 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 01/08/2024

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:3813H.01I Bill No.:HB 1652  Subject:Crimes and Punishment; Criminal Procedure Type:Original  Date:January 8, 2024Bill Summary:This proposal establishes the offense of organized retail theft. 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND 
AFFECTED
FY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2029)
General Revenue($40,371)($98,828)($151,207)($209,754)Total Estimated 
Net Effect on 
General Revenue($40,371)($98,828)($151,207)($209,754)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND 
AFFECTED
FY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2029)
Total Estimated 
Net Effect on 
Other State 
Funds $0$0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 3813H.01I 
Bill No. HB 1652  
Page 2 of 
January 8, 2024
DD:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND 
AFFECTED
FY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2029)
Total Estimated 
Net Effect on 
All Federal 
Funds $0$0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND 
AFFECTED
FY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2029)
Total Estimated 
Net Effect on 
FTE 000$0
☐ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND 
AFFECTED
FY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2029)
Local 
Government$0$0$0$0
FISCAL ANALYSIS L.R. No. 3813H.01I 
Bill No. HB 1652  
Page 3 of 
January 8, 2024
DD:LR:OD
ASSUMPTION
§570.036 – Organized retail theft
Officials from the Department of Corrections (DOC) state this proposal establishes the offense 
of organized retail theft. Section 570.036 creates a class C felony for all thefts during a period of 
120 days and less than $1,000.  A class B felony is created for all thefts during a period of 120 
days and more than $10,000.
For each new class C felony, the department estimates four people could be sentenced to prison 
and six to probation.  The average sentence for a class C felony offense is 6.9 years, of which 3.7 
years will be served in prison with 2.1 years to first release. The remaining 3.2 years will be on 
parole. Probation sentences will be 3 years. 
Given the seriousness of class B felony offenses and that the introduction of a completely new 
class B felony offense is a rare event, the department assumes the admission of one person per 
year to prison following the passage of the legislative proposal.  
Offenders committed to prison with a class B felony as their most serious sentence have an 
average sentence length of 9.0 years and served, on average, 3.4 years in prison prior to first 
release. The department assumes one third of the remaining sentence length will be served in 
prison as a parole return, and the rest of the sentence will be served on supervision in the 
community.
C
hange in prison admissions and probation openings with legislation-Class C Felony
F
Y2025
F
Y2026
F
Y2027
F
Y2028
F
Y2029
F
Y2030
F
Y2031
F
Y2032
F
Y2033
F
Y2034
N
ew Admissions
C
urrent Law
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A
fter Legislation
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
P
robation
C
urrent Law
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A
fter Legislation
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
C
hange (After Legislation - Current Law)
A
dmissions
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
P
robations
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
C
umulative Populations
P
rison
4 8 1
2
1
5
1
5
1
5
1
5
1
5
1
5
1
5
P
arole
0 0 0 1 5 9 1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
P
robation
6 1
2
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
I
mpact
P
rison Population
4 8 1
2
1
5
1
5
1
5
1
5
1
5
1
5
1
5
F
ield Population
6 1
2
1
8
1
9
2
3
2
7
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
P
opulation Change
1
0
2
0
3
0
3
4
3
8
4
2
4
6
4
6
4
6
4
6 L.R. No. 3813H.01I 
Bill No. HB 1652  
Page 4 of 
January 8, 2024
DD:LR:OD
Combined Cumulative Estimated Impact
The combined cumulative estimated impact on the department is 20 additional offenders in 
prison and 23 additional offenders on field supervision by FY 2029.
C
hange in prison admissions and probation openings with legislation-Class B Felony
F
Y2025
F
Y2026
F
Y2027
F
Y2028
F
Y2029
F
Y2030
F
Y2031
F
Y2032
F
Y2033
F
Y2034
N
ew Admissions
C
urrent Law
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A
fter Legislation
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
P
robation
C
urrent Law
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A
fter Legislation
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C
hange (After Legislation - Current Law)
A
dmissions
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
P
robations
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C
umulative Populations
P
rison
1 2 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
P
arole
0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 4
P
robation
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I
mpact
P
rison Population
1 2 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
F
ield Population
0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 4
P
opulation Change
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 9
C
hange in prison admissions and probation openings with legislation
F
Y2025
F
Y2026
F
Y2027
F
Y2028
F
Y2029
F
Y2030
F
Y2031
F
Y2032
F
Y2033
F
Y2034
N
ew Admissions
C
urrent Law
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A
fter Legislation
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
P
robation
C
urrent Law
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A
fter Legislation
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
C
hange (After Legislation - Current Law)
A
dmissions
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
P
robations
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
C
umulative Populations
P
rison
5 1
0
1
5
1
9
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
P
arole
0 0 0 1 5 1
0
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
7
P
robation
6 1
2
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
I
mpact
P
rison Population
5 1
0
1
5
1
9
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
F
ield Population
6 1
2
1
8
1
9
2
3
2
8
3
3
3
4
3
5
3
5
P
opulation Change
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
8
4
3
4
8
5
3
5
4
5
5
5
5 L.R. No. 3813H.01I 
Bill No. HB 1652  
Page 5 of 
January 8, 2024
DD:LR:OD
# to 
prison
Cost per 
year
Total Costs for 
prison
Change in 
probation 
& parole 
officers
Total cost 
for 
probation 
and 
parole
# to 
probation 
& parole
Grand Total - 
Prison and 
Probation 
(includes 2% 
inflation)
Year 15($9,689)($40,371)0$06($40,371)Year 210($9,689)($98,828)0$012($98,828)Year 315($9,689)($151,207)0$018($151,207)Year 419($9,689)($195,359)0$019($195,359)Year 520($9,689)($209,754)0$023($209,754)Year 620($9,689)($213,949)0$028($213,949)Year 720($9,689)($218,228)0$033($218,228)Year 820($9,689)($222,592)0$034($222,592)Year 920($9,689)($227,044)0$035($227,044)Year 1020($9,689)($231,585)0$035($231,585)
If this impact statement has changed from statements submitted in previous years, it could be due 
to an increase/decrease in the number of offenders, a change in the cost per day for institutional 
offenders, and/or an increase in staff salaries.
If the projected impact of legislation is less than 1,500 offenders added to or subtracted from the 
department’s institutional caseload, the marginal cost of incarceration will be utilized.  This cost 
of incarceration is $26.545 per day or an annual cost of $9,689 per offender and includes such 
costs as medical, food, and operational E&E.  However, if the projected impact of legislation is 
1,500 or more offenders added or removed to the department’s institutional caseload, the full 
cost of incarceration will be used, which includes fixed costs.  This cost is $99.90 per day or an 
annual cost of $36,464 per offender and includes personal services, all institutional E&E, 
medical and mental health, fringe, and miscellaneous expenses.  None of these costs include 
construction to increase institutional capacity.
  
DOC’s cost of probation or parole is determined by the number of P&P Officer II positions that 
are needed to cover its caseload.  The DOC average district caseload across the state is 51 
offender cases per officer. An increase/decrease of 51 cases would result in a cost/cost avoidance 
equal to the salary, fringe, and equipment and expenses of one P&P Officer II. 
Increases/decreases smaller than 51 offender cases are assumed to be absorbable.
In instances where the proposed legislation would only affect a specific caseload, such as sex 
offenders, the DOC will use the average caseload figure for that specific type of offender to 
calculate cost increases/decreases.  
Oversight does not have any information contrary to that provided by DOC.  Therefore, 
Oversight will reflect DOC’s estimated impact for fiscal note purposes. L.R. No. 3813H.01I 
Bill No. HB 1652  
Page 6 of 
January 8, 2024
DD:LR:OD
Oversight notes the provisions of this proposal state the court shall order a person who violates 
§570.036 to pay restitution. Oversight assumes restitution will be paid to the merchant and there 
will be no impact to the State.
Officials from the Office of Attorney General (AGO)
arising from this proposal can be absorbed with existing personnel and resources. However, the 
AGO may seek additional appropriations if there is a significant increase in litigation or 
investigation.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight assumes the 
AGO will be able to perform any additional duties required by this proposal with current staff 
and resources and will reflect no fiscal impact to the AGO for fiscal note purposes.
Officials from the Missouri Office of Prosecution Services (MOPS) assume the proposal will 
have no measurable fiscal impact on MOPS. The enactment of a new crime creates additional 
responsibilities for county prosecutors and the circuit attorney which may, in turn, result in 
additional costs, which are difficult to determine.
Officials from the Department of Commerce and Insurance, the Department of Public 
Safety - Missouri Highway PatrolOffice of the State Courts Administrator, the Office 
of the State Public Defender, and the City of Kansas City each assume the proposal will have 
no fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information to 
the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.  
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions; 
however, other cities and counties were requested to respond to this proposed legislation but did 
not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri Legislative Information System 
(MOLIS) database is available upon request. L.R. No. 3813H.01I 
Bill No. HB 1652  
Page 7 of 
January 8, 2024
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT 
– State 
Government
FY 2025
(10 Mo.)
FY 2026FY 2027Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2029)
GENERAL 
REVENUE
Cost – DOC 
(§570.036) 
Increased 
incarceration costs($40,371)($98,828)($151,207)($209,754)
ESTIMATED 
NET EFFECT 
ON GENERAL 
REVENUE($40,371)($98,828)($151,207)($209,754)
FISCAL IMPACT 
– Local 
Government
FY 2025
(10 Mo.)
FY 2026FY 2027Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2029)
$0$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
This bill provides that a person commits the offense of organized retail theft if he or she commits 
a series of thefts of retail merchandise on the premises of a merchant or through the use of the 
Internet with the intent to return the merchandise to the merchant for value or resell, trade, or 
barter the merchandise for value in any manner. 
The offense of organized retail theft is a class C felony if the aggregate value of the property or 
services, as determined under the bill, involved in all thefts committed during a 120-day period is 
between $1,500 and $10,000 and a class B felony if such aggregate value is over $10,000. In 
addition to any other penalty, the person who violates the provisions of this bill will be ordered 
to pay restitution.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space. L.R. No. 3813H.01I 
Bill No. HB 1652  
Page 8 of 
January 8, 2024
DD:LR:OD
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Attorney General’s Office
Department of Commerce and Insurance
Department of Corrections
Department of Public Safety - Missouri Highway Patrol
Missouri Office of Prosecution Services
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Office of the State Public Defender
City of Kansas City
Julie MorffRoss StropeDirectorAssistant DirectorJanuary 8, 2024January 8, 2024