COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:3338H.03C Bill No.:HCS for HB Nos. 1706 & 1539 Subject:Professional Registration and Licensing; Sexual Offenses; Health Care
Professionals; Social Workers; Nurses; Crimes and Punishment; Victims of Crime
Type:Original Date:February 5, 2024Bill Summary:This proposal modifies provisions relating to human trafficking.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND
AFFECTED
FY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
General
Revenue*
Greater than
($113,450)
Could exceed
($149,245)
Could exceed
($161,728)
Could exceed
($187,706)
Total Estimated
Net Effect on
General
Revenue
Greater than
($113,450)
Could exceed
($149,245)
Could exceed
($161,728)
Could exceed
($187,706)
*The fiscal impact to General Revenue could exceed the $250,000 threshold depending on the
level of appropriation to the Anti-Trafficking Fund (§210.1505), if any.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND
AFFECTED
FY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
Anti-Trafficking
Fund* $0$0$0$0
Human
Trafficking and
Sexual
Exploitation
Fund* $0$0$0$0
Total Estimated
Net Effect on
Other State
Funds $0$0$0$0
*Revenue and disbursements net to zero. Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 3338H.03C
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 1706 & 1539
Page 2 of
February 5, 2024
DD:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND
AFFECTED
FY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
Total Estimated
Net Effect on
All Federal
Funds $0$0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND
AFFECTED
FY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
General Revenue
(AGO) 1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE
Anti-Trafficking
Fund (AGO)1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE
Total Estimated
Net Effect on
FTE 2 FTE2 FTE2 FTE2 FTE
☒ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any
of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND
AFFECTED
FY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
Local
Government*$0$0$0$0
*Revenue and disbursements net to zero. L.R. No. 3338H.03C
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 1706 & 1539
Page 3 of
February 5, 2024
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
§27.170 – Committee on Sex and Human Trafficking Training
Oversight notes the provisions of this section, which become effective January 1, 2025, and
expire December 31, 2029, establish the Committee on Sex and Human Trafficking Training. On
an annual basis, the committee will establish guidelines for the training, which is to be produced
and distributed in digital platform, required under sections 56.265, 190.142, 198.082, 211.326,
335.059, 337.618, and 590.050. The legislation provides that agencies may provide the training,
and funding for the training is subject to appropriations.
Oversight will reflect the possibility that the General Assembly could appropriate moneys to this
training from the General Revenue Fund and assumes a $0 to unknown cost to produce and
develop the training in a digital platform.
§190.142 – Ambulance services and emergency personnel
Officials from the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) state section
190.142.2(5) of the proposed legislation requires emergency medical technicians (EMTs),
including paramedics, to receive four hours of sex and human trafficking training as part of the
continuing education requirements for re-licensure with the DHSS every five years. The Division
of Regulation and Licensure’s Bureau (DRL) of Emergency Medical Services will have the
ability to verify the sex and human trafficking continuing education requirement during the EMT
and paramedic re-licensure process.
DHSS assumes they can absorb the costs of this section with current resources. However, if the
workload significantly increased or other legislation was enacted, additional resources would be
requested through the appropriation process.
§210.1505 – Statewide Council Against Adult Trafficking and the Commercial Sexual
Exploitation of Children
Officials from the Missouri Senate (SEN) anticipate a negative fiscal impact to reimburse two
senators for travel to Statewide Council Against Adult Trafficking and the Commercial Sexual
Exploitation of Children Council meetings.
The SEN assumes meetings will be held in Jefferson City during the interim. The average of the
total round trip miles for current sitting senators is 256 miles and the current mileage rate, as set
by the Office of Administration is $0.655 cents per mile. Therefore, the SEN estimates a total
cost for senator mileage of approximately $335. The SEN assumes no fiscal responsibility for the
other committee members. L.R. No. 3338H.03C
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 1706 & 1539
Page 4 of
February 5, 2024
DD:LR:OD
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Oversight notes extrapolating the
SEN’s anticipated expenses to the entire task force (21 people) would be approximately $3,521
per meeting. Oversight assumes four meetings per year for a total cost of $14,085.
In response to similar legislation from 2024 (HB 1450), officials from the Attorney General’s
Office (AGO) assumed the need for one (1) Council Chair/Executive Director (210.1505.1(1))
and one (1) administrative support staff to fulfill the duties of section 210.1505.3.
Oversight does not have any information contrary to that provided by AGO. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect AGO’s impact for fiscal note purposes.
Oversight notes the provisions of this section establish the Anti-Trafficking Fund, which
consists of moneys appropriated by the General Assembly as well as any gifts, donations, grants,
and bequests. Moneys in the fund shall be used solely to pay for the position of the executive
director of the statewide council, education and awareness regarding human trafficking, and anti-
trafficking efforts through the state.
Oversight will reflect the possibility that the General Assembly could appropriate moneys to this
new fund from the General Revenue Fund. For fiscal note purposes, Oversight assumes services
provided under this proposal will equal income/appropriations and net to zero.
§§566.151 and 567.030 – Criminal offenses involving a child
Officials from the Department of Corrections (DOC) state this proposal modifies provisions
relating to human trafficking. The bill modifies the age under which a vulnerable person's
statements out of court may be admissible as evidence in court. It also modifies ages in sections
566.151 and 567.030 that expand the applicability of the offenses of enticement of a child and
patronizing prostitution, respectively. While these changes have the potential to impact DOC
offender populations, DOC does not have the data on past offenses needed to estimate an impact.
Therefore, the impact for 566.151 is an unknown cost.
The bill also changes penalties for the offense of patronizing prostitution under section 567.030.
The existing class B misdemeanor could be changed to a class E felony, the existing class E
felony could be a class D felony, and the existing class D felony could be a class B felony.
There were eight convictions under section 567.030 in FY 2023 with class B misdemeanor
penalties. For each new nonviolent class E felony, the department estimates one person could be
sentenced to prison and two to probation. Therefore, DOC estimates that two of the eight
additional sentences could be prison sentences and six could be probation sentences. The average
sentence for a nonviolent class E felony offense is 3.4 years, of which 2.1 years could be served
in prison with 1.4 years to first release. The remaining 1.3 years could be on parole. Probation
sentences could be 3 years. L.R. No. 3338H.03C
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 1706 & 1539
Page 5 of
February 5, 2024
DD:LR:OD
There were three new court commitments to prison and five new probation cases under section
567.030 during FY 2023. Of the three new commitments to prison, one was a class D felony and
two were class E felonies. Of the five new probation cases, one was a class D felony and four
were class E felonies. The three new prison commitments could be changed to one class B felony
and two class D felonies. The five new probation cases could be changed to one class B felony
and four class D felonies.
Estimated Impact from Changing D Penalties to B Penalties
C
hange in prison admissions and probation openings with legislation-Class E Felony (nonviolent)
F
Y2025
F
Y2026
F
Y2027
F
Y2028
F
Y2029
F
Y2030
F
Y2031
F
Y2032
F
Y2033
F
Y2034
N
ew Admissions
C
urrent Law
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A
fter Legislation
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
P
robation
C
urrent Law
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A
fter Legislation
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
C
hange (After Legislation - Current Law)
A
dmissions
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
P
robations
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
C
umulative Populations
P
rison
2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
P
arole
0 0 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
P
robation
6 1
2
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
I
mpact
P
rison Population
2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
F
ield Population
6 1
2
2
0
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
P
opulation Change
8 1
6
2
4
2
5
2
5
2
5
2
5
2
5
2
5
2
5
C
hange in prison admissions and probation openings with legislation-Class B Felony
F
Y2025
F
Y2026
F
Y2027
F
Y2028
F
Y2029
F
Y2030
F
Y2031
F
Y2032
F
Y2033
F
Y2034
N
ew Admissions
C
urrent Law
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
A
fter Legislation
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
P
robation
C
urrent Law
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
A
fter Legislation
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
C
hange (After Legislation - Current Law)
A
dmissions
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P
robations
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C
umulative Populations
P
rison
0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 2
P
arole
0 0 0 0 0 -
1
-
1
-
1
1 1
P
robation
0 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
I
mpact
P
rison Population
0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 2
F
ield Population
0 0 0 1 2 1 1 2 3 3
P
opulation Change
0 0 0 1 2 2 3 4 5 5 L.R. No. 3338H.03C
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 1706 & 1539
Page 6 of
February 5, 2024
DD:LR:OD
Estimated Impact from Changing E Penalties to D Penalties
Combined Cumulative Estimated Impact
The combined cumulative estimated impact on the department is 7 additional offenders in prison
and 24 additional offenders on field supervision by FY 2031.
C
hange in prison admissions and probation openings with legislation
F
Y2025
F
Y2026
F
Y2027
F
Y2028
F
Y2029
F
Y2030
F
Y2031
F
Y2032
F
Y2033
F
Y2034
N
ew Admissions
C
urrent Law
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
A
fter Legislation
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
P
robation
C
urrent Law
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
A
fter Legislation
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
C
hange (After Legislation - Current Law)
A
dmissions
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P
robations
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C
umulative Populations
P
rison
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
P
arole
0 0 -
1
0 2 2 2 2 2 2
P
robation
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I
mpact
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P
rison Population
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
F
ield Population
0 0 -
1
0 2 2 2 2 2 2
P
opulation Change
0 0 0 1 3 3 3 3 3 3
C
hange in prison admissions and probation openings with legislation
F
Y2025
F
Y2026
F
Y2027
F
Y2028
F
Y2029
F
Y2030
F
Y2031
F
Y2032
F
Y2033
F
Y2034
N
ew Admissions
C
urrent Law
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
A
fter Legislation
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
P
robation
C
urrent Law
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
A
fter Legislation
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
C
hange (After Legislation - Current Law)
A
dmissions
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
P
robations
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
C
umulative Populations
P
rison
2 4 5 5 5 6 7 7 7 7
P
arole
0 0 1 3 5 4 4 4 6 6
P
robation
6 1
2
1
8
1
9
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
I
mpact
P
rison Population
2 4 5 5 5 6 7 7 7 7
F
ield Population
6 1
2
1
9
2
2
2
5
2
4
2
4
2
5
2
6
2
6
P
opulation Change
8 1
6
2
4
2
7
3
0
3
0
3
1
3
2
3
3
3
3 L.R. No. 3338H.03C
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 1706 & 1539
Page 7 of
February 5, 2024
DD:LR:OD
# to
prison
Cost per
year
Total Costs for
prison
Change in
probation
& parole
officers
Total cost
for
probation
and
parole
# to
probation
& parole
Grand Total -
Prison and
Probation
(includes 2%
inflation)
Year 12($9,689)($16,148)0$06($16,148)Year 24($9,689)($39,531)0$012($39,531)Year 35($9,689)($50,402)0$019($50,402)Year 45($9,689)($51,410)0$022($51,410)Year 55($9,689)($52,438)0$025($52,438)Year 66($9,689)($64,185)0$024($64,185)Year 77($9,689)($76,380)0$024($76,380)Year 87($9,689)($77,907)0$025($77,907)Year 97($9,689)($79,465)0$026($79,465)Year 107($9,689)($81,055)0$026($81,055)
If this impact statement has changed from statements submitted in previous years, it could be due
to an increase/decrease in the number of offenders, a change in the cost per day for institutional
offenders, and/or an increase in staff salaries.
If the projected impact of legislation is less than 1,500 offenders added to or subtracted from the
department’s institutional caseload, the marginal cost of incarceration will be utilized. This cost
of incarceration is $26.545 per day or an annual cost of $9,689 per offender and includes such
costs as medical, food, and operational E&E. However, if the projected impact of legislation is
1,500 or more offenders added or removed to the department’s institutional caseload, the full
cost of incarceration will be used, which includes fixed costs. This cost is $99.90 per day or an
annual cost of $36,464 per offender and includes personal services, all institutional E&E,
medical and mental health, fringe, and miscellaneous expenses. None of these costs include
construction to increase institutional capacity.
DOC’s cost of probation or parole is determined by the number of P&P Officer II positions that
are needed to cover its caseload. The DOC average district caseload across the state is 51
offender cases per officer. An increase/decrease of 51 cases would result in a cost/cost avoidance
equal to the salary, fringe, and equipment and expenses of one P&P Officer II.
Increases/decreases smaller than 51 offender cases are assumed to be absorbable.
In instances where the proposed legislation would only affect a specific caseload, such as sex
offenders, the DOC will use the average caseload figure for that specific type of offender to
calculate cost increases/decreases.
Oversight notes, from information provided by the State Courts Administrator, the following
number of felony convictions under §566.151 and §567.030: L.R. No. 3338H.03C
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 1706 & 1539
Page 8 of
February 5, 2024
DD:LR:OD
FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023
§566.151 felonies 15 19 25 22 24
§567.030 felonies 1 0 2 3 10
Oversight notes the felony convictions under §566.151 are a class F felony.
Oversight does not have any information contrary to that provided by DOC. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect DOC’s impact for fiscal note purposes.
§589.700 – Human trafficking offenses
Oversight notes the provisions of this bill state in addition to any fine imposed for a violation of
section 566.203, 566.206, 566.209, 566.210, 566.211, or 566.215, the court shall enter a
judgment of restitution payable to the Human Trafficking and Sexual Exploitation Fund
established under section 589.700, upon a plea of guilty or a finding of guilt for a violation of
this section in the following amounts:
Upon receipt of the moneys from the fund, a county shall allocate the disbursement as follows:
local rehabilitation services such as mental health and substance abuse counseling;
parenting skills, housing relief, vocational training, and employment counseling; and
increasing the number of local law enforcement members charged with enforcing human
trafficking laws.
Oversight notes OSCA reported the following number of guilty convictions in 2019 – 2023:
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
§566.203 0 0 0 0 0
§566.206 0 0 0 0 0
§566.209 1 0 0 0 1
§566.210 0 0 0 1 0
§566.211 3 1 1 2 3
§566.215 0 0 0 0 0
Oversight has no way to determine the number of victims associated with each guilty conviction
listed above; therefore, Oversight will assume an (unknown) impact to the new Human
Trafficking and Sexual Exploitation Fund. For fiscal note purposes, Oversight assumes services
provided by the counties will equal income and net to zero. L.R. No. 3338H.03C
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 1706 & 1539
Page 9 of
February 5, 2024
DD:LR:OD
Bill as a whole
Officials from the Office of the Governor (GOV) state this bill adds to the Governor’s current
load of appointment duties. Individually, additional requirements should not fiscally impact the
Office of the Governor. However, the cumulative impact of additional appointment duties across
all enacted legislation may require additional resources for the Office of the Governor.
Officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator (OSCA) state there may be some
impact but there is no way to quantify that currently. Any significant changes will be reflected in
future budget requests.
Officials from the St. Louis County Police Department state the proposed legislation would
have a fiscal impact. If passed, the Department would be required to update policy and conduct
training to inform officers of the changes in law. Policy creation and updating would require 8
hours of policy research and 4 hours of policy authoring. The average hourly wage of the policy
development position is $46.69. The total cost of policy development is $560.28. The training
development would require 8 hours at the same hourly wage of $46.69. The total cost of training
development is $373.52.
All 820 commissioned officers would be required to attend the two-hour training. The average
rate of a police officer is $53.03. The total cost of attending training is $86,969. This cost does
not include covering shifts for officers at the training, which will likely result in required
overtime.
Oversight notes because the training is provided on a digital platform and since the language is
permissive, Oversight assumes the St. Louis County Police Department will be able to absorb the
costs associated with this proposal.
Officials from the Department of Commerce and Insurance, the Department of Elementary
and Secondary Education, the Department of Mental Health, the Department of Public
Safety – (Office of the Director and Missouri Highway Patrol), the Department of Social
ServicesMissouri House of Representatives, the Missouri Office of Prosecution
ServicesOffice of AdministrationOffice of the State Public Defender, the Branson
Police Department, and the Kansas City Police Department each assume the proposal will
have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations.
In response to similar legislation from 2024 (HB 1450), officials from the Office of the State
Treasurer assumed the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their organization.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero
impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions;
however, other counties, county prosecutors, nursing homes, local law enforcement, L.R. No. 3338H.03C
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 1706 & 1539
Page 10 of 14
February 5, 2024
DD:LR:OD
ambulance/EMS, and hospitals were requested to respond to this proposed legislation but did
not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri Legislative Information System
(MOLIS) database is available upon request.
FISCAL IMPACT –
State Government
FY 2025
(6 Mo.)
FY 2026FY 2027Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
GENERAL
REVENUE
Costs - (§27.170) To
produce and develop
training in a digital
platform - p.3
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)$0
Costs– AGO
(§210.1505) p. 3-4Could exceed…
Personal Service($41,667)($51,000)($52,020)($52,020) Fringe Benefits($28,667)($34,788)($35,183)($35,183) Exp. & Equip.($12,883)($9,841)($10,038)($10,038)Meeting expenses($14,085)($14,085)($14,085)($14,085)Total Costs - AGO($97,302)($109,714)($111,326)($111,326) FTE Change - AGO1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE1 FTECosts – DOC
(§§566.151 and
567.030) Increased
incarceration costs
p.4-8
Could exceed
($16,148)
Could exceed
($39,531)
Could exceed
($50,402)
Could exceed
($76,380)
Transfer Out –
(§210.1505) To the
Anti-Trafficking
Fund p. 3-4
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON
GENERAL
REVENUE
Greater than
($113,450)
Could exceed
($149,245)
Could exceed
($161,728)
Could exceed
($187,706) L.R. No. 3338H.03C
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 1706 & 1539
Page 11 of 14
February 5, 2024
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT –
State Government
FY 2025
(6 Mo.)
FY 2026FY 2027Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
Estimated Net FTE
Change on General
Revenue1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE
ANTI-
TRAFFICKING
FUND
Income –
(§210.1505) Gifts,
grants, donations
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
Transfer In –
(§210.1505) From
General Revenue
p.3-4
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
Costs – AGO
(§210.1505) Training
and anti-trafficking
efforts p. 3-4(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
Costs – AGO
(§210.1505)
Executive Director
position p. 3-4Could exceed…
Personal Service($70,833)($86,700)($88,434)($88,434) Fringe Benefits($39,972)($48,626)($49,298)($49,298) Exp. & Equip.($12,883)($9,841)($10,038)($10,038)Total Costs - AGO($123,688)($145,167)($147,770)($147,770) FTE Change - AGO1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE1 FTEESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON THE
ANTI-
TRAFFICKING
FUND $0$0$0$0 L.R. No. 3338H.03C
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 1706 & 1539
Page 12 of 14
February 5, 2024
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT –
State Government
FY 2025
(6 Mo.)
FY 2026FY 2027Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
Estimated Net FTE
Change on the Anti-
Trafficking Fund 1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE
HUMAN
TRAFFICKING
AND SEXUAL
EXPOITATION
FUND
Revenue –
(§589.700)
Restitution revenue
p. 8UnknownUnknownUnknownUnknown
Transfer Out – To
Counties (Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON THE
HUMAN
TRAFFICKING
AND SEXUAL
EXPOITATION
FUND $0$0$0$0 L.R. No. 3338H.03C
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 1706 & 1539
Page 13 of 14
February 5, 2024
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT
– Local
Government
FY 2025
(6 Mo.)
FY 2026FY 2027Fully
Implemented
(FY 2031)
LOCAL
POLITICAL
SUBDIVISIONS
Transfer In –
Counties
(§589.700) From
Human Trafficking
and Sexual
Exploitation Fund UnknownUnknownUnknownUnknown
Costs - (§589.700)
Local rehab
services, education
programs, etc.(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
ESTIMATED
NET EFFECT
TO LOCAL
POLITICAL
SUBDIVISIONS$0$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
The proposed legislation modifies provisions relating to human trafficking.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Attorney General’s Office L.R. No. 3338H.03C
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 1706 & 1539
Page 14 of 14
February 5, 2024
DD:LR:OD
Department of Commerce and Insurance
Department of Corrections
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Department of Health and Senior Services
Department of Mental Health
Department of Public Safety
Department of Social Services
Missouri House of Representatives
Missouri Office of Prosecution Services
Missouri Senate
Office of Administration
Office of the Governor
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Office of the State Public Defender
Office of the State Treasurer
Branson Police Department
Kansas City Police Department
St. Louis County Police Department
Julie MorffRoss StropeDirectorAssistant DirectorFebruary 5, 2024February 5, 2024