Missouri 2024 2024 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HJR125 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/16/2024

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:3214H.02I Bill No.:HJR 125  Subject:Constitutional Amendments; Department of Conservation; Department of Natural 
Resources; Political Subdivisions; Taxation and Revenue - Sales and Use; 
Taxation and Revenue - Property 
Type:Original  Date:April 16, 2024Bill Summary:This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment changing the 
membership of the Conservation Commission, the conservation sales and 
use tax, and the Department of Conservation's property tax exemption. 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2025FY 2026FY 2027
General Revenue*
$0 or (More than 
$8,000,000)$0$0
Total Estimated Net 
Effect on General 
Revenue
$0 or (More than 
$8,000,000)$0$0
*Costs only if the Governor calls a special election.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Conservation 
Commission Funds*$0 or ($15,980,000)$0 or ($31,960,000)$0 or ($31,960,000)
Division of State 
Parks Funds (DNR)*$0 or $7,990,000$0 or $15,980,000$0 or $15,980,000
Total Estimated Net 
Effect on Other State 
Funds$0 or ($7,990,000)$0 or ($15,980,000)$0 or ($15,980,000)
*Oversight notes the joint resolution diverts 10% of total funds from the conservation sales and 
use tax to the Department of Natural Resources (Division of State Parks) and 10% to local 
political subdivisions in which land owned by the MDC is located.  Oversight has reflected the 
impact as “$0 or” depending upon voter approval.
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 3214H.02I 
Bill No. HJR 125  
Page 2 of 
April 16, 2024
KB:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Total Estimated Net 
Effect on All Federal 
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Total Estimated Net 
Effect on FTE 000
☒ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☒ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Local Government$0 or $7,990,000$0 or $15,980,000$0 or $15,980,000 L.R. No. 3214H.02I 
Bill No. HJR 125  
Page 3 of 
April 16, 2024
KB:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) assume this proposal will 
have an unknown negative fiscal impact greater than $250,000.
Oversight notes the joint resolution diverts 10% of total funds from the conservation sales and 
use tax to the Department of Natural Resources (Division of State Parks) and another 10% to 
local political subdivisions in which land owned by the MDC is located.  
Oversight notes, according to MDC’s budget information, the department collected $159.8 
million in conservation sales tax revenue in FY 2023.  This would equate to $15,980,000 being 
redistributed to the Department of Natural Resources and $15,980,000 to local political 
subdivisions. Oversight will reflect a $0 (voters do not approve of the constitutional amendment) 
to a $15,980,000 increase in revenue to Department of Natural Resources and $15,980,000 to 
local political subdivisions.  Oversight will reflect a $0 (voters do not approve of the 
constitutional amendment) to a loss of $31,960,000 to MDC.  If approved, Oversight will assume 
six months (starting January 1, 2025) of impact in FY 2025.
Officials from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
of Conservation for the potential fiscal impact of this proposal. 
Officials from the Office of the Governor, Missouri House of RepresentativesMissouri 
Senate, Department of Social Services, State Tax Commission and Joint Committee on 
Administrative Rules each assume the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective 
organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight 
will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.  
Officials from the City of Kansas City assume the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their 
organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will 
reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note.  
Oversight assumes there could be a potential increase to property tax revenue to the Blind 
Pension Fund and local political subdivisions from Article IV, Section 43(b).2 for property 
acquired by the commission. However, Oversight assumes this amount would be minimal. 
Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for this provision.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions; 
however, other local political subdivisions were requested to respond to this proposed legislation 
but did not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri Legislative Information 
System (MOLIS) database is available upon request. L.R. No. 3214H.02I 
Bill No. HJR 125  
Page 4 of 
April 16, 2024
KB:LR:OD
Officials from Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) assume, each year, a number of joint 
resolutions that would refer to a vote of the people a constitutional amendment and bills that 
would refer to a vote of the people the statutory issue in the legislation may be considered by the 
General Assembly.  
Unless a special election is called for the purpose, Joint Resolutions proposing a constitutional 
amendment are submitted to a vote of the people at the next general election.  Article XII section 
2(b) of the Missouri Constitution authorizes the governor to order a special election for 
constitutional amendments referred to the people.  If a special election is called to submit a Joint 
Resolution to a vote of the people, section 115.063.2 RSMo requires the state to pay the costs.   
The cost of the special election has been estimated to be $8 million based on the cost of the 2022 
primary and general election reimbursements.
The Secretary of State’s office is required to pay for publishing in local newspapers the full text 
of each statewide ballot measure as directed by Article XII, Section 2(b) of the Missouri 
Constitution and Section 116.230-116.290, RSMo.  Funding for this item is adjusted each year 
depending upon the election cycle.  A new decision item is requested in odd numbered fiscal 
years and the amount requested is dependent upon the estimated number of ballot measures that 
will be approved by the General Assembly and the initiative petitions certified for the ballot.  In 
FY 2014, the General Assembly changed the appropriation so that it was no longer an estimated 
appropriation. 
For the FY25 petitions cycle, the SOS estimates publication costs at $60,000 per page. This 
amount is subject to change based on number of petitions received, length of those petitions and 
rates charged by newspaper publishers. 
The Secretary of State’s office will continue to assume, for the purposes of this fiscal note, that it 
should have the full appropriation authority it needs to meet the publishing requirements. 
Because these requirements are mandatory, the SOS reserves the right to request funding to meet 
the cost of the publishing requirements if the Governor and the General Assembly again change 
the amount or continue to not designate it as an estimated appropriation.
Oversight has reflected, in this fiscal note, the state potentially reimbursing local political 
subdivisions the cost of having this joint resolution voted on during a special election in fiscal 
year 2025. This reflects the decision made by the Joint Committee on Legislative Research that 
the cost of the elections should be shown in the fiscal note. The next scheduled statewide general 
election is in November 2024 (FY 2025). It is assumed the subject within this proposal could be 
on this ballot; however, it could also be on a special election called for by the Governor (a 
different date). Therefore, Oversight will reflect a potential election cost reimbursement to local 
political subdivisions in FY 2025. L.R. No. 3214H.02I 
Bill No. HJR 125  
Page 5 of 
April 16, 2024
KB:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2025
(6 Mo.)
FY 2026FY 2027GENERAL REVENUE FUNDTransfer Out - SOS - reimbursement of 
local election authority election costs if 
a special election is called by the 
Governor
$0 or (More 
than 
$8,000,000)$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
THE GENERAL REVENUE FUND
$0 or (More 
than 
$8,000,000)$0$0
CONSERVATION COMMISSION 
FUNDS
Transfer Out – MDC – 20% to DNR 
and local political subdivisions
$0 or 
($15,980,000)
$0 or 
($31,960,000)
$0 or 
($31,960,000)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
CONSERVATION COMMISSION 
FUNDS
$0 or 
($15,980,000)
$0 or 
($31,960,000)
$0 or 
($31,960,000)
DIVISION OF STATE PARKS 
FUNDS (DNR)
Transfer In – DNR – 10% of 
conservation sales and use tax proceeds
$0 or 
$7,990,000
$0 or 
$15,980,000
$0 or 
$15,980,000
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
DIVISION OF STATE PARKS 
FUNDS (DNR)
$0 or 
$7,990,000
$0 or 
$15,980,000
$0 or 
$15,980,000 L.R. No. 3214H.02I 
Bill No. HJR 125  
Page 6 of 
April 16, 2024
KB:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2025
(6 Mo.)
FY 2026FY 2027LOCAL POLITICAL 
SUBDIVISIONS
Transfer In - 10% of conservation sales 
and use tax proceeds
$0 or 
$7,990,000
$0 or 
$15,980,000
$0 or 
$15,980,000
Transfer In - Local Election Authorities 
- reimbursement of election costs by the 
State for a special election
$0 or More 
than 
$8,000,000$0$0
Costs - Local Election Authorities - cost 
of a special election if called for by the 
Governor
$0 or (More 
than 
$8,000,000)$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
LOCAL POLITICAL 
SUBDIVISIONS
$0 or 
$7,990,000
$0 or 
$15,980,000
$0 or 
$15,980,000
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
Currently, the Conservation Commission consists of four members appointed by the Governor 
with not more than two members from the same political party. If approved by the voters, this 
resolution would allow the number, qualifications, and terms of the Commission members to be 
set by law, with no more than half of the members from the same political party and each 
member residing in a different Congressional district, as specified in the bill. 
The resolution specifies that if the Governor fails to fill a vacancy on the Commission within 30 
days, the remaining members shall fill the vacancy by a majority vote from a list of 10 
individuals provided by the General Assembly. The General Assembly will develop the list of 
individuals as specified in the resolution. 
The resolution also would prohibit any member from accepting a gift of any value from anyone 
who receives or has received compensation from or performs a service for the Commission. If a 
member receives a gift, the Missouri Ethic Commission must investigate as specified in the bill. 
If found to have violated the prohibition, the Commission member shall vacate the office. The 
Ethic Commission must forward its findings to the Attorney General for prosecution.  L.R. No. 3214H.02I 
Bill No. HJR 125  
Page 7 of 
April 16, 2024
KB:LR:OD
Anyone who enters into a contract with the Conservation Commission must report, as specified 
in the resolution, each item, service, or thing of value provided to each member of the 
Commission or any person related to a Commissioner within the first degree of consanguinity. 
The resolution also specifies that beginning on January 1 the year following approval, 10% of 
revenue derived from the Conservation Sales and Use Tax will go for duties and responsibilities 
of the Division of State Parks within the Department of Natural Resources and 10% for the 
duties and responsibilities of local political subdivisions in which land owned by the Department 
of Conservation is located. 
The resolution specifies the manner in which the portion of the revenues to local political 
subdivisions is to be distributed. 
The resolution also requires the Department of Conservation to pay property taxes on real 
property in the amount not less than that private citizens would be required to pay. The General 
Assembly must also review any proposed sale or purchase of real property by the Department of 
Conservation prior to the transaction being final.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Missouri Department of Conservation
Department of Natural Resources
Office of the Governor
Missouri House of Representatives
Missouri Senate
Joint Committee on Administrative Rules
Office of the Secretary of State
State Tax Commission
Department of Social Services
City of Kansas City
Julie MorffRoss StropeDirectorAssistant DirectorApril 16, 2024April 16, 2024