Missouri Senate Bill SCR23

Missouri 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/10/24
• Refer: 1/11/24
• Engrossed: 2/5/24
• Refer: 2/8/24
• Report Pass: 2/21/24
• Refer: 2/22/24
• Report Pass: 2/26/24

Caption

Disapproves and suspends the final order of rule making for the proposed amendment to 5 CSR 20-100.230 regarding the Virtual Instruction Program

Impact

The proposed resolution would significantly affect the implementation of the Virtual Instruction Program by halting changes that could potentially undermine regulatory standards put forth by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. If enacted, this resolution would aim to re-establish compliance with legislative requirements and restore confidence in educational policymaking. Such changes are crucial in an era where virtual instruction is becoming increasingly prevalent and must adhere to strict standards to protect students' rights and ensure educational quality.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 23 (SCR23) is a legislative move aimed at disapproving and suspending the final order of rulemaking concerning the proposed amendment to 5 CSR 20-100.230, which relates to the Virtual Instruction Program. This decision stems from findings by the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules which indicated that the amendment was not in compliance with the statutes in Chapter 536 of RSMo, highlighting issues of regulatory protocol and adherence to legal requirements essential for educational standards in Missouri. SCR23 proposes to ensure that any amendments in this regard comply strictly with existing legislative frameworks to maintain educational integrity within the state.

Contention

Discussion surrounding SCR23 has indicated points of contention particularly related to the balance between administrative rulemaking and the legislative oversight necessary to ensure quality in education. Opponents of the amendment and proponents of SCR23 argue that failing to comply with regulatory standards can lead to a deterioration in the quality of virtual educational offerings. This reflects broader concerns in the community about the capability of educational institutions to adapt while maintaining rigorous standards, suggesting that regulatory compliance and flexibility in educational offerings must be thoughtfully integrated.