Missouri 2024 2024 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SJR71 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/28/2024

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:4005S.03P Bill No.:Perfected SS for SCS for SJR 71  Subject:Attorneys; Constitutional Amendments; Courts; County Officials; Fees; Law 
Enforcement Officers And Agencies; Public Officers 
Type:Original  Date:February 28, 2024Bill Summary:This proposal provides for the levying of certain costs and fees to support the 
salaries and benefits of sheriffs, prosecuting attorneys, and circuit attorneys. 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2025FY 2026FY 2027
General Revenue*
$0 or (More than 
$8,000,000)$0$0
Total Estimated Net 
Effect on General 
Revenue
$0 or (More than 
$8,000,000)$0$0
*The potential fiscal impact of “(More than $8,000,000)” would be realized only if a special 
election were called by the Governor to submit this joint resolution to voters.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Total Estimated Net 
Effect on Other State 
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 4005S.03P 
Bill No. Perfected SS for SCS for SJR 71  
Page 2 of 
February 28, 2024
JLH:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Total Estimated Net 
Effect on All Federal 
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Total Estimated Net 
Effect on FTE 000
☒ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2025FY 2026FY 2027Local Government$0*$0 or Unknown$0 or Unknown
*Transfer out and transfer in net to zero if the Governor calls a special election. L.R. No. 4005S.03P 
Bill No. Perfected SS for SCS for SJR 71  
Page 3 of 
February 28, 2024
JLH:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Oversight was unable to receive some of the agency responses in a timely manner due to the 
short fiscal note request time. Oversight has presented this fiscal note on the best current 
information that we have or on information regarding a similar bill. Upon the receipt of agency 
responses, Oversight will review to determine if an updated fiscal note should be prepared and 
seek the necessary approval to publish a new fiscal note.
In response to a previous version, SCS for SJR 71 (2024), officials from Office of the Secretary 
of State (SOS) assumed, each year, a number of joint resolutions that would refer to a vote of the 
people a constitutional amendment and bills that would refer to a vote of the people the statutory 
issue in the legislation may be considered by the General Assembly.  
Unless a special election is called for the purpose, Joint Resolutions proposing a constitutional 
amendment are submitted to a vote of the people at the next general election.  Article XII section 
2(b) of the Missouri Constitution authorizes the governor to order a special election for 
constitutional amendments referred to the people.  If a special election is called to submit a Joint 
Resolution to a vote of the people, section 115.063.2 RSMo requires the state to pay the costs.   
The cost of the special election has been estimated to be $8 million based on the cost of the 2022 
primary and general election reimbursements.
The Secretary of State’s office is required to pay for publishing in local newspapers the full text 
of each statewide ballot measure as directed by Article XII, Section 2(b) of the Missouri 
Constitution and Section 116.230-116.290, RSMo.  Funding for this item is adjusted each year 
depending upon the election cycle.  A new decision item is requested in odd numbered fiscal 
years and the amount requested is dependent upon the estimated number of ballot measures that 
will be approved by the General Assembly and the initiative petitions certified for the ballot.  In 
FY 2014, the General Assembly changed the appropriation so that it was no longer an estimated 
appropriation. 
For the FY25 petitions cycle, the SOS estimates publication costs at $60,000 per page. This 
amount is subject to change based on number of petitions received, length of those petitions and 
rates charged by newspaper publishers. 
The Secretary of State’s office will continue to assume, for the purposes of this fiscal note, that it 
should have the full appropriation authority it needs to meet the publishing requirements. 
Because these requirements are mandatory, the SOS reserves the right to request funding to meet 
the cost of the publishing requirements if the Governor and the General Assembly again change 
the amount or continue to not designate it as an estimated appropriation.
Oversight has reflected, in this fiscal note, the state potentially reimbursing local political 
subdivisions the cost of having this joint resolution voted on during a special election in fiscal  L.R. No. 4005S.03P 
Bill No. Perfected SS for SCS for SJR 71  
Page 4 of 
February 28, 2024
JLH:LR:OD
year 2025. This reflects the decision made by the Joint Committee on Legislative Research that 
the cost of the elections should be shown in the fiscal note. The next scheduled statewide general 
election is in November 2024 (FY 2025). It is assumed the subject within this proposal could be 
on this ballot; however, it could also be on a special election called for by the Governor (a 
different date). Therefore, Oversight will reflect a potential election cost reimbursement to local 
political subdivisions in FY 2025.
Officials from Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement (JCPER) state they have 
reviewed the proposal.  The bill has no direct fiscal impact to the Joint Committee on Public 
Employee Retirement.
According to actuarial information provided by the retirement system, this proposal would 
constitute a “substantial proposed change” in future plan benefits as defined in section 
105.660(10).  Pursuant to section 105.670, an actuarial cost statement must be filed with the 
Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives, the Secretary of the Senate, and the Joint 
Committee on Public Employee Retirement as public information for at least five legislative 
days prior to final passage.
Oversight notes according to the 2023 Annual Report to the General Assembly by the Joint 
Committee on Public Employee Retirement, the Sheriffs’ Retirement System had the following 
activity:
Employer contributions: $973,559
Market Value (2021) $53,526,623
Actuarial Value (2021) $50,537,005
Liabilities (2021) $46,965,919
Officials from the Sheriffs’ Retirement System state the impact is unknown at this time.  If the 
constitutional amendment passed it would restore the court fee collection currently in statute for 
the Missouri Sheriffs' Retirement fund.
In response to a previous version, SCS for SJR 71 (2024), officials from Office of the State 
Courts Administrator (OSCA) stated there may be some impact but there is no way to quantify 
that currently.  Any significant changes would be reflected in future budget requests.  
Oversight requested additional information from OSCA but did not receive a response.
Oversight will not show an impact to OSCA for this proposal. 
In response to a previous version, SCS for SJR 71 (2024), officials from the Department of 
Revenue assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their organization. Oversight 
does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in 
the fiscal note for this agency.   L.R. No. 4005S.03P 
Bill No. Perfected SS for SCS for SJR 71  
Page 5 of 
February 28, 2024
JLH:LR:OD
Officials from the Prosecuting Attorneys’ & Circuit Attorneys’ Retirement System did not 
respond to Oversight’s request for fiscal impact for this proposal.
In response to a previous version, SCS for SJR 71 (2024), officials from the Missouri Office of 
Prosecution Services and the Phelps County Sheriff each assumed the proposal would have no 
fiscal impact on their respective organizations. 
Oversight notes, based on an article in Forbes, the court fees accounted for approximately $2.1 
million annually for the Sheriffs’ Retirement System. 
Oversight assumes if the court fine collection is restored by this resolution, this would result in 
savings to local political subdivision from reduced employer contributions beginning in FY 
2026. 
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2025
(10 Mo.)
FY 2026FY 2027GENERAL REVENUETransfer Out - SOS - reimbursement of 
local election authority election costs if 
a special election is called by the 
Governor
$0 or (More 
than 
$8,000,000)$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
GENERAL REVENUE
$0 or (More 
than 
$8,000,000)$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2025
(10 Mo.)
FY 2026FY 2027LOCAL POLITICAL 
SUBDIVISIONS
Savings – Sheriffs - from reduced 
employer contributions for the Missouri 
Sheriffs’ Retirement System if funding 
through court costs is restored$0$0 or Unknown$0 or Unknown
Transfer In - Local Election Authorities 
- reimbursement of election costs by the 
State for a special election
$0 or More 
than 
$8,000,000$0$0 L.R. No. 4005S.03P 
Bill No. Perfected SS for SCS for SJR 71  
Page 6 of 
February 28, 2024
JLH:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2025
(10 Mo.)
FY 2026FY 2027Costs - Local Election Authorities - cost 
of a special election if called for by the 
Governor
$0 or (More 
than 
$8,000,000)$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
LOCAL POLITICAL 
SUBDIVISIONS$0
$0 or 
Unknown
$0 or 
Unknown
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
This proposed constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that the 
administration of justice shall include levying costs and fees to support salaries and benefits for 
sheriffs, prosecuting attorneys, and circuit attorneys.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of the Secretary of State
Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Missouri Office of Prosecution Services
Sheriffs’ Retirement System
Phelps County Sheriff
Julie MorffRoss StropeDirectorAssistant DirectorFebruary 28, 2024