COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:2368H.01I Bill No.:HB 1182 Subject:Political Subdivisions; Cities, Towns, and Villages; Counties; Fees Type:Original Date:February 21, 2025Bill Summary:This proposal changes provisions governing geographical information
systems.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net
Effect on General
Revenue $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net
Effect on Other State
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 2368H.01I
Bill No. HB 1182
Page 2 of
February 21, 2025
NM:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net
Effect on All Federal
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net
Effect on FTE 000
☐ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any
of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Local Government$0$0$0 L.R. No. 2368H.01I
Bill No. HB 1182
Page 3 of
February 21, 2025
NM:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
§67.1850 – Geographical Information System
Officials from the Office of Attorney General (AGO)
arising from this proposal can be absorbed with existing resources. However, the AGO may seek
additional appropriations if the proposal results in a significant increase in litigation or
investigation.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight assumes the
AGO will be able to perform any additional duties required by this proposal with current staff
and resources and will reflect no fiscal impact to the AGO for fiscal note purposes.
Officials from the Department of Natural Resources, Kansas City and O’Fallon each assume
the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not
have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal
note for these agencies.
In response to similar legislation from 2023, HCS for HB 50, officials from Springfield
the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their organization. Oversight does not have any
information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note.
Oversight is unclear on the type of printed copies, the number of copies that are printed by each
local political subdivision (LPS) each year and/or how much is charged for these printed copies.
Oversight researched a few LPS who have access to GIS information and compiled their data in
the chart below. L.R. No. 2368H.01I
Bill No. HB 1182
Page 4 of
February 21, 2025
NM:LR:OD
Oversight assumes this version of the proposal allows GIS fees charged by the LPS to be at a
reasonable fee. As stated in §67.1850.5(2) the cost “shall not exceed a reasonable fee
representing the cost to the community of time, equipment, consumables, and personnel in the
production of the map or other products.” Oversight assumes this fee would be offset by the cost
of the product and ultimately net to zero. Therefore, Oversight will reflect $0 impact for this
proposal.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions;
however, other cities and counties were requested to respond to this proposed legislation but did
not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri Legislative Information System
(MOLIS) database is available upon request.
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028$0$0$0
J
ackson County
J
efferson County
C
ity of
C
olumbia
B
uchanan County
P
arcel Maps
r
ange from $5 to
$
15
4
2x48 range
f
rom $6 to 12
C
adastral Layers
r
ange from $10 to
$
500
C
ode Sheets &
T
CA Maps $12
7
2x78 range
f
rom $10 to
$
30
J
urisdictional
L
ayers range
f
rom $10 to $400
A
dditional Layer
$
2
7
2x78 photo
p
aper $90
P
lanimetrics
L
ayers range
f
rom $30 to $150
C
ustom Maps: $5
p
er Linear Ft. plus
c
ustom fee
@
$30/hr
D
igital
F
ormats:
R
ange from
$
15 to $125
p
er panel or
$
25 for Metro
A
rea
T
ransportation
L
ayers range
f
rom $2 to $1,000
D
igital Formats:
D
epending on
t
he Data it could
r
ange from $20
p
er tile to $300
p
er megabyte
C
ensus Layers are
$
20 per census
t
ract or block
T
he assessor’s
d
ata files (tax
r
olls) are
a
vailable for
p
urchase in
d
igital format.
D
ata can also be
r
equested
o
utside the
s
cope of the
A
ssessor’s
r
esponsibilities
o
r beyond a
r
easonable
e
xpectation. L.R. No. 2368H.01I
Bill No. HB 1182
Page 5 of
February 21, 2025
NM:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
The proposed legislation appears to have no direct fiscal impact.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Attorney General’s Office
Department of Natural Resources
City of Springfield
City of Kansas City
O’Fallon
Julie MorffJessica HarrisDirectorAssistant DirectorFebruary 21, 2025February 21, 2025