Missouri House Bill HB13

Missouri 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/25
• Refer: 2/20/25
• Report Pass: 3/26/25
• Engrossed: 4/3/25
• Refer: 4/8/25
• Engrossed: 4/7/25
• Report Pass: 4/24/25
• Enrolled: 5/9/25
• Passed: 6/30/25

Caption

Appropriates money for real property leases and related services

Impact

The passage of HB 13 is significant as it outlines a clear framework for managing state resources, through facilitated funding allocations across different sectors such as education, health services, and public safety. By specifying the amounts to be appropriated and the flexibility allowed in fund management, the bill aims to ensure that state agencies can respond to their operational needs effectively while adhering to constitutional provisions related to appropriations. This structured approach is intended not only to enhance administrative efficiency but also to bolster the overall functionality of state services.

Summary

House Bill 13 serves as an appropriations bill aimed at providing funding for various departments and agencies within the state of Missouri for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026. The bill details the allocation of monetary resources necessary for the operation of essential functions, including real property leases, utilities, systems furniture, and structural modifications across governmental divisions. This initiative underscores the state's commitment to maintaining operational integrity and efficiency within its departments.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 13 appears to be largely positive among legislators, as evidenced by a strong bipartisan vote of 139 in favor and only 7 against during the conference. Supporters argue that the bill fosters a necessary financial foundation that enables state departments to effectively carry out their missions. However, some dissent exists over the specifics of funding allocations, with certain members advocating for increased funding in particular areas, thereby reflecting varying priorities regarding resource distribution.

Contention

Notable points of contention vary among representatives, particularly regarding the balance of funding across departments. Some lawmakers expressed concerns that certain vital areas, especially in public health and social services, are not adequately funded compared to other sectors. This has sparked dialogue about equitable distribution of state resources and has raised questions about whether some agencies may encounter operational challenges due to underspecified financial support. Ultimately, while the bill's passage signifies a cooperative effort to ensure governmental functionality, discussions continue about optimizing the appropriations process and financial governance.