Missouri 2025 2025 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB224 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/16/2025

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:0556H.04C Bill No.:HCS for HB 224  Subject:Professional Registration and Licensing; Sexual Offenses; Health Care 
Professionals; Social Workers; Victims of Crime; Crimes and Punishment 
Type:Original  Date:February 16, 2025Bill Summary:This proposal modifies provisions relating to human trafficking. 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND 
AFFECTED
FY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2032)
General RevenueCould exceed 
($118,410)
Could exceed 
($158,545)
Could exceed 
($194,126)
Could exceed 
($261,258)
Total Estimated 
Net Effect on 
General 
Revenue
Could exceed 
($118,410)
Could exceed 
($158,545)
Could exceed 
($194,126)
Could exceed 
($261,258) L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 2 of 
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND 
AFFECTED
FY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2032)
Anti-Trafficking 
Fund* $0$0$0$0
Pretrial Witness 
Protection**(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
Human 
Trafficking and 
Sexual 
Exploitation 
Fund* $0$0$0$0
Total Estimated 
Net Effect on 
Other State 
Funds(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
*Revenue and disbursements net to zero. 
**Reimbursements to law enforcement agencies and/or prosecuting or circuit attorney’s offices 
is assumed to be less than $250,000 annually based on past disbursements.
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND 
AFFECTED
FY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2032)
Total Estimated 
Net Effect on 
All Federal 
Funds $0$0$0$0 L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 3 of 
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND 
AFFECTED
FY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2032)
General Revenue 
- AGO 1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE
Anti-Trafficking 
Fund - AGO1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE
Total Estimated 
Net Effect on 
FTE 2 FTE2 FTE2 FTE2 FTE
☒ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND 
AFFECTED
FY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2032)
Local 
Government*UnknownUnknownUnknownUnknown
*Reimbursements to law enforcement agencies and/or prosecuting or circuit attorney’s offices is 
assumed to be less than $250,000 annually based on past disbursements. L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 4 of 
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
§27.170 – Committee on Sex and Human Trafficking Training
Oversight notes the provisions of this section, which become effective January 1, 2026, and 
expire December 31, 2030, establish the Committee on Sex and Human Trafficking Training. On 
an annual basis, the committee will establish guidelines for the training, which is to be produced 
and distributed in a digital platform, required under sections 56.265, 190.142, 211.326, 337.618, 
and 590.050. The legislation provides that agencies may provide the training, and funding for the 
training is subject to appropriation. 
Oversight will reflect the possibility that the General Assembly could appropriate moneys to this 
training from the General Revenue Fund and assumes a $0 to unknown cost to produce and 
develop the training in a digital platform.
§190.142 – Ambulance services and emergency personnel 
Officials from the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) state section 
190.142.2(5) of the proposed legislation requires emergency medical technicians (EMTs), 
including paramedics, to receive four hours of sex and human trafficking training as part of the 
continuing education requirements for re-licensure with the DHSS every five years. The Division 
of Regulation and Licensure’s Bureau (DRL) of Emergency Medical Services will have the 
ability to verify the sex and human trafficking continuing education requirement during the EMT 
and paramedic re-licensure process.
DHSS assumes they can absorb the costs of this section with current resources. However, if the 
workload significantly increased or other legislation was enacted, additional resources would be 
requested through the appropriation process.
§210.1505 – Statewide Council Against Adult Trafficking and the Commercial Sexual 
Exploitation of Children
In response to a previous version, officials from the Attorney General’s Office (AGO) assumed 
this proposal will increase caseloads.  The AGO requests one (1) AAG IV to manage the 
additional cases and one (1) Paralegal to fulfill duties of this legislation.
Oversight does not have any information contrary to that provided by AGO. Therefore, 
Oversight will reflect AGO’s impact for fiscal note purposes.
Officials from the Missouri Senate (SEN) anticipate a negative fiscal impact to reimburse two 
senators for travel to Statewide Council Against Adult Trafficking and the Commercial Sexual 
Exploitation of Children Council meetings.  L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 5 of 
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
The SEN assumes meetings will be held in Jefferson City during the interim. The average of the 
total round trip miles for current sitting senators is 255 miles and the current mileage rate, as set 
by the Office of Administration is $0.655 cents per mile. Therefore, the SEN estimates a total 
cost for senator mileage of approximately $334. The SEN assumes no fiscal responsibility for the 
other committee members.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Oversight assumes the SEN can absorb 
the minimal fiscal impact for this proposal within existing funding levels and will reflect no 
fiscal impact for this agency. If multiple bills pass which require additional staffing and duties at 
substantial costs, SEN could request funding through the appropriation process.
Officials from the Missouri House of Representatives (MHR) state the House will absorb any 
reasonable expenses for their member serving on the council.
Oversight notes the provisions of this section establish the Anti-Trafficking Fund, which 
consists of moneys appropriated by the General Assembly as well as any gifts, donations, grants, 
and bequests.  Moneys in the fund shall be used solely to pay for the position of the executive 
director of the statewide council, education and awareness regarding human trafficking, and anti-
trafficking efforts through the state. 
Oversight will reflect the possibility that the General Assembly could appropriate moneys to this 
new fund from the General Revenue Fund. For fiscal note purposes, Oversight assumes services 
provided under this proposal will equal income/appropriations and net to zero.
§337.618 – Social workers
Officials from the Department of Corrections (DOC) state section 337.618 requires licensed 
social workers to complete two hours of sex and human trafficking training in order to renew 
their license.  This would have a minimal impact on the department, which can be absorbed.
§491.641 – Pretrial witness protection programs
Officials from the Department of Public Safety – Office of the Director (DPS) state while this 
funding could increase the spending out of the fund, DPS believes that spending the funding for 
this function is needed and appropriate. DPS assumes that approximately $50,000 - $75,000 in 
reimbursements will be requested by law enforcement, county prosecutors, and the circuit 
attorney for FY 2026; between $75,000 and $100,000 for FY 2027; and between $100,000 and 
$125,000 for FY 2028.
In response to similar legislation from 2024 (SCS HCS HB Nos. 1706 & 1539), Oversight 
contacted DPS officials to determine how DPS came up with the estimates provided above. 
Officials said this was a best guess as they have no way to calculate how much might be 
requested by law enforcement, county prosecutors and the circuit attorney in witness protection  L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 6 of 
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
costs. Therefore, Oversight will assume an unknown impact to the Pretrial Witness Protection 
Fund (0868). Based on previous disbursements, Oversight assumes disbursements will be less 
than $250,000 annually. Oversight also assumes DPS can absorb the IT cost to update the system 
within current funding levels.
Oversight notes the Pretrial Witness Protection Fund was enacted by HB 66 during the 2020 
Special session and became effective September 21, 2020. One million dollars was transferred 
into the fund and on June 30, 2021, the fund balance was $1,000,497. During FY 2022, another 
$1 million was transferred into the fund, as well as interest income, but only slightly over 
$14,400 was disbursed from the fund. The ending fund balance was just under $2 million. 
During FY 2023, distributions were approximately $39,300 and the year-end fund balance was 
$2,012,135. The fund balance as of December 31, 2024, was $2,052,225.
§556.039 – Prosecutions involving a person 19 years of age or older
DOC states this section stipulates prosecutions under sections 566.203 to 566.211 involving a 
person nineteen years of age or older shall be commenced no later than twenty years after the 
commission of the offense.  The department anticipates this section will have no impact.
§566.151 – Criminal offenses involving a child
DOC states this section changes the age of the victim from any person who is less than fifteen to 
seventeen years of age. From FY 2022 to FY 2024, the department totaled 59 new prison 
admissions and 3 new probation cases for sentences of enticement of a child. The increase in the 
minimum age under which a person can be considered to be enticed as a child could create 
additional instances in which a person could be charged with a crime under this section. 
However, there is no available data to determine the number of 16 and 17 year olds to whom this 
could have potentially applied.  Therefore, the impact is an unknown cost.
§567.030 – Patronizing prostitution
DOC states this section changes the age of the victim from less than eighteen years of age but 
older than fourteen to older than fifteen years of age. The bill changes the existing class B 
misdemeanor to a class E felony if the individual the person patronizes is eighteen years of age 
or older, it changes the existing class E felony to a class D felony if the individual the person 
patronizes is older than fifteen but younger than eighteen years of age, and it changes the class D 
felony to a class B felony if the individual who the person patronizes is fifteen years of age or 
younger.
There were seven guilty pleas to class B misdemeanors under section 567.030 in FY 2024.  For 
each new sex and child abuse class E felony, the department estimates three could be sentenced 
to prison and four to probation.  This estimate will assume out of the seven guilty pleas, three 
will be sentenced to prison and four to probation.  The average sentence for a sex or child abuse 
related class E felony offense is 3.5 years, of which 2.9 years will be served in prison with 2.6  L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 7 of 
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
years to first release. The remaining 0.6 years will be on parole. Probation sentences will be 5 
years.
The cumulative impact on the department is estimated to be 9 additional offenders in prison and 
12 additional offenders on field supervision by FY 2028.
There was an average of one new court commitment to prison and no new probation cases under 
section 567.030 from FY 2022 to FY 2024 with the felony E offense class. These offenses would 
be changed from class E felonies to class D felonies. The average sentence length for a class E 
felony sex and child abuse offense is 3.5 years, with 2.6 years spent in prison. Changing this to a 
class D felony would extend the sentence length to 6.6 years, with 5.3 years spent in prison.
The estimated impact on the department would be an additional 3 offenders in prison by FY 
2031. L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 8 of 
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
There were three new court commitments to prison and one new probation case under section 
567.030 from FY 2021 through FY 2024 that were class D felonies. Given there have been years 
in which there were no new court commitments and/or probation cases under this section, the 
DOC will use the averages of one new court commitment and one new probation case annually 
over this three-year period to estimate the impact. The average sentence length for a class D 
felony sex and child abuse offense is 6.6 years, with 5.3 years spent in prison. Changing this to a 
class B felony would extend the sentence length to 9.0 years, with 7.3 years spent in prison.
The estimated cumulative impact on the department would be an additional 2 offenders in prison 
and one less offender on field supervision by FY 2032.
C
hange in prison admissions and probation openings with legislation
F
Y2026
F
Y2027
F
Y2028
F
Y2029
F
Y2030
F
Y2031
F
Y2032
F
Y2033
F
Y2034
F
Y2035
N
ew Admissions
C
urrent Law
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
A
fter Legislation
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
P
robation
C
urrent Law
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
A
fter Legislation
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
C
hange (After Legislation - Current Law)
A
dmissions
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P
robations
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C
umulative Populations
P
rison
0 0 0 1 2 3 3 3 3 3
P
arole
0 0 0 -
1
-
1
0 0 0 0 0
P
robation
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I
mpact
P
rison Population
0 0 0 1 2 3 3 3 3 3
F
ield Population
0 0 0 -
1
-
1
0 0 0 0 0
P
opulation Change
0 0 0 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 9 of 
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
Combined Cumulative Estimated Impact
The combined cumulative estimated impact on the department is 14 additional offenders in 
prison and 21 additional offenders on field supervision by FY2032.
C
hange in prison admissions and probation openings with legislation
F
Y2026
F
Y2027
F
Y2028
F
Y2029
F
Y2030
F
Y2031
F
Y2032
F
Y2033
F
Y2034
F
Y2035
N
ew Admissions
C
urrent Law
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
A
fter Legislation
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
P
robation
C
urrent Law
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
A
fter Legislation
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
C
hange (After Legislation - Current Law)
A
dmissions
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
P
robations
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
C
umulative Populations
P
rison
3 6 9 1
0
1
1
1
3
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
P
arole
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2
P
robation
4 8 1
2
1
6
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
I
mpact
P
rison Population
3 6 9 1
0
1
1
1
3
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
F
ield Population
4 8 1
2
1
7
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
P
opulation Change
7 1
4
2
1
2
8
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
5
3
6
3
6
# to 
prison
Cost per 
year
Total Costs 
for prison
Change in 
probation 
& parole 
officers
Total cost 
for 
probation 
and 
parole
# to 
probation 
& parole
Grand Total - 
Prison and 
Probation 
(includes 2% 
inflation)
Year 13($10,485)($26,212)0$04($26,212)Year 26($10,485)($64,168)0$08($64,168)Year 39($10,485)($98,177)0$012($98,177)Year 410($10,485)($111,268)0$017($111,268)Year 511($10,485)($124,842)0$021($124,842)Year 613($10,485)($150,492)0$021($150,492)Year 714($10,485)($165,309)0$021($165,309)Year 814($10,485)($168,615)0$021($168,615)Year 914($10,485)($171,988)0$021($171,988)Year 1014($10,485)($175,427)0$021($175,427)
If this impact statement has changed from statements submitted in previous years, it could be due 
to an increase/decrease in the number of offenders, a change in the cost per day for institutional 
offenders, and/or an increase in staff salaries.
If the projected impact of legislation is less than 1,500 offenders added to or subtracted from the 
department’s institutional caseload, the marginal cost of incarceration will be utilized.  This cost 
of incarceration is $28.73 per day or an annual cost of $10,485 per offender and includes such  L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 10 of 19
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
costs as medical, food, and operational E&E.  However, if the projected impact of legislation is 
1,500 or more offenders added or removed to the department’s institutional caseload, the full 
cost of incarceration will be used, which includes fixed costs.  This cost is $100.25 per day or an 
annual cost of $36,591 per offender and includes personal services, all institutional E&E, 
medical and mental health, fringe, and miscellaneous expenses.  None of these costs include 
construction to increase institutional capacity.
  
DOC’s cost of probation or parole is determined by the number of P&P Officer II positions that 
are needed to cover its caseload.  The DOC average district caseload across the state is 51 
offender cases per officer. An increase/decrease of 51 cases would result in a cost/cost avoidance 
equal to the salary, fringe, and equipment and expenses of one P&P Officer II. 
Increases/decreases smaller than 51 offender cases are assumed to be absorbable.
In instances where the proposed legislation would only affect a specific caseload, such as sex 
offenders, the DOC will use the average caseload figure for that specific type of offender to 
calculate cost increases/decreases.  
Oversight notes, from information provided by the State Courts Administrator, the following 
number of felony convictions under §566.151 and §567.030:
FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024
§566.151 felonies     19    25    22    24     24
§567.030 felonies      0      3     3    10       2
Oversight does not have any information contrary to that provided by DOC. Therefore, 
Oversight will reflect DOC’s impact for fiscal note purposes.
§589.700 – Human trafficking offenses
DOC states section 589.700 establishes a judgment of restitution payable to the human 
trafficking and sexual exploitation fund for violations of section 566.203, 566.206, 566.209, 
566.210, 566.211, or 566.215.  As this fine is manually entered into the Offender Finance 
System, it is unknown the additional staff time which will be required to enter the fines, as there 
is no way to know how many people found guilty of these offenses would be sentenced and 
incarcerated to the department.  Therefore, the impact to this legislation is an unknown cost.
Oversight assumes the DOC has sufficient staff and resources to handle any increase in 
workload required under the provisions of this section and will reflect no fiscal impact for fiscal 
note purposes.
Oversight notes the provisions of this bill state in addition to any fine imposed for a violation of 
section 566.203, 566.206, 566.209, 566.210, 566.211, or 566.215, the court shall enter a 
judgment of restitution payable to the Human Trafficking and Sexual Exploitation Fund  L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 11 of 19
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
established under section 589.700, upon a plea of guilty or a finding of guilt for a violation of 
this section in the following amounts:


Upon receipt of the moneys from the fund, a county shall allocate the disbursement as follows:

local rehabilitation services such as mental health and substance abuse counseling; 
parenting skills, housing relief, vocational training, and employment counseling; and

increasing the number of local law enforcement members charged with enforcing human 
trafficking laws.
Oversight notes OSCA reported the following number of guilty convictions in 2020 – 2024:
         2020        2021        2022        2023        2024
§566.203 0 0           0 0            0
§566.206 0 0           0 0 0
§566.209 0 0                 0 1 2
§566.210 0 0           1 0 0
§566.211 1 1           2 3 9
§566.215 0 0           0 0 0
Oversight has no way to determine the number of victims associated with each guilty conviction 
listed above; therefore, Oversight will assume an (unknown) impact to the new Human 
Trafficking and Sexual Exploitation Fund. For fiscal note purposes, Oversight assumes services 
provided by the counties will equal income and net to zero.
§590.050 – Continuing education requirements
DPS states there will be a small IT cost to update their system.
Oversight assumes DPS is provided with core funding to handle a certain amount of activity 
each year. Oversight assumes DPS could absorb the costs related to this proposal.
Responses regarding the proposed legislation as a whole
In response to a previous version, officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator 
(OSCA) stated there may be some impact but there is no way to quantify that currently. Any 
significant changes will be reflected in future budget requests. L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 12 of 19
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
Oversight notes OSCA assumes this proposal may have some impact on their organization 
although it can’t be quantified at this time. As OSCA is unable to provide additional information 
regarding the potential impact, Oversight assumes the proposed legislation will have a $0 to 
(Unknown) cost to the General Revenue Fund. For fiscal note purposes, Oversight also assumes 
the impact will be under $250,000 annually. If this assumption is incorrect, this would alter the 
fiscal impact as presented in this fiscal note. If additional information is received, Oversight will 
review it to determine if an updated fiscal note should be prepared and seek approval to publish a 
new fiscal note.
Officials from the St. Louis County Police Department state the proposed legislation would 
have a fiscal impact.  If passed, the Department would be required to update policy and conduct 
training to inform officers of the changes in law. Policy creation and updating would require 8 
hours of policy research and 4 hours of policy authoring. The average hourly wage of the policy 
development position is $46.69. The total cost of policy development is $560.28. The training 
development would require 8 hours at the same hourly wage of $46.69.  The total cost of training 
development is $373.52.
All 820 commissioned officers would be required to attend the two-hour training. The average 
rate of a police officer is $53.03.  The total cost of attending training is $86,969.  This cost does 
not include covering shifts for officers at the training, which will likely result in required 
overtime. 
Oversight notes the fiscal impact for the St. Louis County Police Department. Oversight 
assumes some annual training of officers is conducted regardless of this bill, and this change 
could be incorporated into that training. Additionally, because this training is provided on a 
digital platform and since the language is permissive, Oversight assumes the St. Louis County 
Police Department will be able to absorb the costs associated with this proposal.
Officials from the Department of Commerce and Insurance, the Department of Elementary 
and Secondary Education, the Department of Mental Health, the Department of Natural 
Resources, the Department of Public Safety – (Capitol PoliceMissouri Highway 
Patrol), the Department of Revenue, the Department of Social Services, the Missouri 
Department of Conservation, the Missouri Department of Transportation, the Missouri 
Office of Prosecution Services, the Office of AdministrationOffice of the Governor, the 
Office of the State Public Defender, the City of Kansas City, the
Department, Branson Police Department and the Kansas City Police Department
proposal will have no fiscal impact on their organization. Oversight does not have any 
information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for 
these agencies.  
In response to a previous version, officials from the Office of the State Treasurer and the 
Branson Police Department
respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, 
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.   L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 13 of 19
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
  
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions; 
however, other counties, circuit clerks, county prosecutors, nursing homes, local law 
enforcement, ambulance/EMS, and hospitals were requested to respond to this proposed 
legislation but did not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri Legislative 
Information System (MOLIS) database is available upon request.
FISCAL IMPACT – 
State Government
FY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2032)
GENERAL 
REVENUE
Cost - (§27.170) To 
produce and develop 
training in a digital 
platform p. 4
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)$0
Cost – AGO 
(§210.1505) p. 4Could exceed…
   Personal Service($45,833)($56,100)($57,222)($57,222)  Fringe Benefits($31,530)($38,277)($38,727)($38,727)  Exp. & Equip.($14,835)$0$0$0Total Cost - AGO($92,198)($94,377)($95,949)($95,949)  FTE Change - AGO1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE1 FTECost – DOC p. 6-10 
(§§566.151 and 
567.030) Increased 
incarceration costs
Could exceed 
($26,212)
Could exceed 
($64,168)
Could exceed 
($98,177)
Could exceed 
($165,309)
Transfer Out – p. 5 
(§210.1505) To the 
Anti-Trafficking Fund  
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET 
EFFECT ON 
GENERAL 
REVENUE
Could exceed 
($118,410)
Could exceed 
($158,545)
Could exceed 
($194,126)
Could exceed 
($261,258) L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 14 of 19
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – 
State Government
FY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2032)
Estimated Net FTE 
Change on General 
Revenue1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE
ANTI-
TRAFFICKING 
FUND
Income – p. 4 
(§210.1505) Gifts, 
grants, donations
$0 to 
Unknown
$0 to 
Unknown
$0 to 
Unknown
$0 to 
Unknown
Transfer In – p. 4 
(§210.1505) From 
General Revenue 
$0 to
 Unknown
$0 to 
Unknown
$0 to 
Unknown
$0 to 
Unknown
Cost – AGO p. 4 
(§210.1505) Training 
and anti-trafficking 
efforts  (Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
Cost – AGO  p. 5 
(§210.1505) Executive 
Director position   Could exceed…
   Personal Service($77,500)($94,860)($96,757)($96,757)  Fringe Benefits($44,222)($53,812)($54,572)($54,572)  Exp. & Equip.($14,835)$0$0$0Total Cost - AGO($136,557)($148,672)($151,329)($151,329)  FTE Change - AGO1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE1 FTEESTIMATED NET 
EFFECT ON THE 
ANTI-
TRAFFICKING 
FUND $0$0$0$0 L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 15 of 19
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – 
State Government
FY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2032)
Estimated Net FTE 
Change on the Anti-
Trafficking Fund1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE1 FTE
PRETRIAL 
WITNESS 
PROTECTION 
FUND (0868)
Cost – DPS  p. 5-6 
(§491.641) – 
Reimbursement of 
pretrial witness 
protection costs (Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET 
EFFECT ON THE 
PRETRIAL 
WITNESS 
PROTECTION 
FUND(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
HUMAN 
TRAFFICKING 
AND SEXUAL 
EXPOITATION 
FUND
Revenue – (§589.700) 
Restitution revenue 
p. 10-11UnknownUnknownUnknownUnknown
Transfer Out – To 
Counties  p. 10-11(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown) L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 16 of 19
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – 
State Government
FY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2032)
ESTIMATED NET 
EFFECT ON THE 
HUMAN 
TRAFFICKING 
AND SEXUAL 
EXPOITATION 
FUND $0$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – 
Local Government
FY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2032)
LOCAL POLITICAL 
SUBDIVISIONS
Income – County 
Prosecutors/Law 
Enforcement 
(§491.641) –   p. 5-6 
Reimbursement of 
pretrial witness 
protection costsUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknown
Transfer In – Counties   
(§589.700) From 
Human Trafficking and 
Sexual Exploitation 
Fund p. 10-11UnknownUnknownUnknownUnknown
Cost - (§589.700) 
Local rehab services, 
education programs, 
etc.  p. 10-11(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET 
EFFECT TO LOCAL 
POLITICAL 
SUBDIVISIONSUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknown L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 17 of 19
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – 
Local Government
FY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028Fully 
Implemented 
(FY 2032)
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
PROTECTION OF VULNERABLE PERSONS
This bill establishes the "Committee on Sex and Human Trafficking Training", which will be 
composed of eight members, including, among others, a representative of the Attorney General's 
Office, a representative of the Department of Public Safety, and a juvenile officer. The 
committee must annually evaluate and establish guidelines for required sex and human 
trafficking training. The committee will dissolve on December 31, 2030. 
The bill also establishes the "Statewide Council Against Adult Trafficking and Commercial 
Sexual Exploitation of Children" to replace the "Statewide Council on Sex Trafficking and 
Sexual Exploitation of Children", which expired on December 31, 2023. The new council must 
be created within 30 days of August 28, 2025, is required to meet at least quarterly, and is within 
the Office of the Attorney General. The Attorney General or his or her designee will be the chair 
of the council. The members of the council are specified and include two members of the Senate 
appointed by the President Pro Tem rather than one being appointed by the Minority Floor 
Leader of the Senate, and the two members of the House of Representatives appointed by the 
Speaker rather than one being appointed by the Minority Floor Leader of the House of 
Representatives. 
The bill creates the "Anti-Trafficking Fund". Money in the Fund will be used solely to pay for 
the position of the executive director of the statewide council, education and awareness regarding 
human trafficking, and anti-trafficking efforts throughout the State.
The Department of Health and Senior Services will require each EMT, including each 
paramedic, to receive four hours of sex and human trafficking training as part of continuing 
education requirements for relicensure every five years. Each county prosecuting attorney and 
juvenile officer must complete one hour of sex and human trafficking training annually, social 
workers will be required to complete two hours of sex and human trafficking training for license 
renewal, and each peace officer will be required to receive two hours of sex and human 
trafficking training within the law enforcement continuing education one-year reporting period. 
Currently, under certain circumstances, a statement made by a child under the age of 14 or by a 
vulnerable person, or the visual and aural recording of a verbal or nonverbal statement of such 
child or vulnerable person, is admissible into evidence in criminal proceedings as substantive  L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 18 of 19
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. This bill increases the age to a child under the 
age of 18 and it amends the definition of "vulnerable person" to include a person whose 
developmental level does not exceed that of an ordinary child of 17 years of age.
Currently, any law enforcement agency may provide for the security of witnesses and others in 
criminal proceedings or investigations. This bill allows any prosecuting attorney's office to 
provide such security as well. The Department of Public Safety may authorize funds to be 
disbursed to prosecuting attorneys' offices for such offices to be able to provide security. 
The bill creates a 20-year statute of limitation for prosecution of certain sex and labor trafficking 
offenses, described in the bill. 
Currently, a person 21 years old or older commits the offense of enticement of a child if he or 
she satisfies the elements of the offense, and the child is under 15 years old. This bill increases 
the age of the child to under 17 years old. 
The bill also specifies that a person who pleaded guilty to or was found guilty of certain sexual 
offenses, specified in the bill, will be required to pay $10,000 in restitution per identified victim 
and $2,500 for each county in which the offense or offenses occurred, payable to the State to be 
deposited into the "Human Trafficking and Sexual Exploitation Fund", which is created in this 
bill. Upon receipt of money from the Fund, a county must allocate disbursement of the funds 
according to the requirements in the bill.
Currently, a person who was convicted of the offense of prostitution who was under the age of 
18 at the time of the offense can apply to the appropriate court to have his or her record 
expunged. This bill repeals the requirement that the person be under the age of 18 at the time of 
the offense.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Attorney General’s Office
Department of Commerce and Insurance
Department of Corrections
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Department of Health and Senior Services
Department of Mental Health
Department of Natural Resources
Department of Public Safety
Department of Revenue
Department of Social Services
Missouri Department of Conservation L.R. No. 0556H.04C 
Bill No. HCS for HB 224  
Page 19 of 19
February 16, 2025
DD:LR:OD
Missouri Department of Transportation
Missouri House of Representatives
Missouri Office of Prosecution Services
Missouri Senate
Office of Administration
Office of the Governor
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Office of the State Public Defender
Office of the State Treasurer
City of Kansas City
Phelps County Sheriff’s Department
Branson Police Department
Kansas City Police Department
St. Louis County Police Department
Branson Police Department
Julie MorffJessica HarrisDirectorAssistant DirectorFebruary 16, 2025February 16, 2025