Missouri 2025 2025 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB329 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/26/2025

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:1346H.01I Bill No.:HB 329  Subject:Retirement - Schools; Retirement Systems and Benefits - General; Education, 
Elementary and Secondary; Employees - Employers; Teachers 
Type:Original  Date:February 26, 2025Bill Summary:This proposal modifies the total cost of living adjustments for members of 
the Public School Retirement System and the Public Education Employee 
Retirement System. 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on General 
Revenue $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on Other State 
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 1346H.01I 
Bill No. HB 329  
Page 2 of 
February 26, 2025
JLH:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on All Federal 
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on FTE 000
☐ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Local Government(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown) L.R. No. 1346H.01I 
Bill No. HB 329  
Page 3 of 
February 26, 2025
JLH:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement (JCPER) state the bill 
has no direct fiscal impact to the JCPER. 
The JCPER’s review of this proposal indicates that its provisions may constitute a “substantial 
proposed change” in future plan benefits as defined in section 105.660(10).  It is impossible to 
accurately determine the fiscal impact of this legislation without an actuarial cost statement 
prepared in accordance with section 105.665.  Pursuant to section 105.670, an actuarial cost 
statement must be filed with the Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives, the Secretary of 
the Senate, and the Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement as public information for at 
least five legislative days prior to final passage.
Officials from the Public Schools and Education Employee Retirement Systems 
(PSRS/PEERS) state this bill, as currently drafted, would amend RSMo Section 169.070 and 
Section 169.670 to allow the current 80% lifetime limitation on total cost-of-living increases 
granted to a retired member or beneficiary (the "COLA cap") to increase over time. Beginning 
December 31, 2025, and at each December 31 thereafter, an increase to the COLA cap of 1% 
shall be approved by the Board of Trustees if the System's investments earn 2% or greater 
returns in excess of the investment return rate adopted by the Board of Trustees in the 
immediately prior fiscal year (ending June 30 of such year). The annual increase to the COLA 
cap shall not exceed 1% per year, and the COLA cap shall not increase to more than 100%.
The Public School Retirement System of Missouri (PSRS) and the Public Education Employee
Retirement System of Missouri (PEERS) have an actuary firm, PwC US (PwC), that prepares 
actuarial cost statements on any proposed legislation as well as the annual actuarial valuation 
reports for the Systems. This legislation was submitted to them and the actuarial cost statements 
discuss in detail the estimated impact to the Systems. As currently proposed, the COLA cap 
increase is estimated to have a significant fiscal impact to both PSRS and PEERS and is further 
discussed in the following analysis.
Analysis of impact on PSRS and PEERS
To estimate the fiscal impact of HB 329 PwC assumed the current 80% COLA cap would 
increase prospectively by 1% (to 81%, then 82%, and so on) each year the System's investment 
return on a market value basis exceeded the expected rate of return on assets assumption by 2% 
or more. As of June 30, 2024, the expected rate of return on assets assumption used in the annual 
actuarial valuation of the System is 7.3%, so PwC assumed that any time the return on the 
market value of assets is 9.3% or more, the COLA cap would increase by 1% until the cap 
reaches 100%.
Based on an analysis provided by the Systems' investment advisor, the asset return on the market 
value of assets is expected to exceed the assumed return by 2% or more 40% of the time, or two  L.R. No. 1346H.01I 
Bill No. HB 329  
Page 4 of 
February 26, 2025
JLH:LR:OD
out of every five years. Therefore, PwC assumed that in two years, the 80% COLA cap would 
increase to 81%, and then three years after that, the 81% COLA cap would increase to 82%, and 
so on until the COLA cap reached 100%.
The estimated fiscal impact analysis for PSRS and PEERS was illustrated by PwC using various
alternative scenarios and comparing to the Baseline scenario. The Baseline scenario is defined as 
the June 2024 valuation results, which utilize the most recent member data and includes current 
plan provisions. PwC’s estimates do not include any additional administrative costs that may be 
incurred by the System to implement this change.
For PSRS, the estimated fiscal impact to the Actuarial Accrued Liability (“AAL”) ranges from
$95.9 million based on the Systems current inflation and COLA assumptions (Scenario A) to
$2.5 billion if higher inflation is a sustained economic trend resulting in changes to the
Systems’ inflation and COLA assumptions (Scenario B). For PEERS the estimated fiscal
impact to the AAL ranges from $2.2 million to $292.6 million under the same Scenarios.
Additional scenarios were provided within the actuarial cost statements with varying ranges of
estimated impact to the AAL for both PSRS and PEERS.
Scenario A illustrates the estimated fiscal impact of HB 329, as currently drafted, compared to 
the Baseline scenario. Scenario B is the same as Scenario A, but the long-term COLA 
assumption for the Systems was increased by 50 basis points from 1.35% to 1.85% beginning 
January 1, 2026, and each January 1 thereafter. This scenario is provided to illustrate the 
sensitivity of the liabilities to the COLA assumption. The COLA assumption is directly 
correlated to the Systems inflation assumption. To the extent the Federal Reserve is unsuccessful 
in reducing current inflation to the 2.00% long-term inflation target, the Systems inflation and 
COLA assumptions could be impacted in the future.
Based on the information provided by PSRS and PEERS, Oversight notes the following:
PSRS Actuarially Determined 
Contribution (ADC) Rate
Baseline (Current Provisions) 27.98%Scenario A28.11%Scenario B31.65%PEERS Actuarially Determined 
Contribution (ADC) Rate
Baseline (Current Provisions) 13.22%Scenario A13.23%Scenario B14.33%
Oversight assumes these provisions will increase employer contribution rates for school districts 
and community colleges beginning in FY  2026. L.R. No. 1346H.01I 
Bill No. HB 329  
Page 5 of 
February 26, 2025
JLH:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028$0$0$0FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028LOCAL POLITICAL 
SUBDIVISIONS
Costs – School Districts - increase in 
employer contributions(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
Costs – Community Colleges - increase 
in employer contributions(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
LOCAL POLITICAL 
SUBDIVISIONS(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
Currently, retired members of the Public School Retirement System ("PSRS") and the Public 
Education Employee Retirement System ("PEERS") may receive yearly cost of living 
adjustments on monthly retirement allowances, but the total of the cost of living adjustments 
must not exceed 80% of a member's original monthly retirement allowance.
Under the provisions of this bill, the 80% limitation will be subject to annual increases approved 
by the Board of Trustees beginning December 31, 2025, and every December 31st thereafter, 
except the increases to the limitation must not exceed 1% per year. Additionally, if the 
investments of the system earn 2% or greater returns than the investment return rate adopted by 
the Board, the limitation on the total cost of living adjustments must be increased by 1%. 
However, the cost of living adjustments must not exceed 100% of a member's original monthly 
retirement allowance. 
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space. L.R. No. 1346H.01I 
Bill No. HB 329  
Page 6 of 
February 26, 2025
JLH:LR:OD
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement
Public Schools and Education Employee Retirement Systems
Julie MorffJessica HarrisDirectorAssistant DirectorFebruary 26, 2025February 26, 2025