Missouri 2025 2025 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB433 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 03/14/2025

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:1527H.02C Bill No.:HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 Subject:Banks and Financial Institutions; Attorney General; State Treasurer Type:Original  Date:March 14, 2025Bill Summary:This proposal modifies standards for storage and use of gold and silver. 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028
General Revenue*
(Could exceed 
$668,080)
(Could substantially 
exceed $192,779)
(Could substantially 
exceed $196,005)
Total Estimated Net 
Effect on General 
Revenue
(Could exceed 
$668,080)
(Could substantially 
exceed $192,779)
(Could substantially 
exceed $196,005)
*Oversight notes the stated amounts above ($668,080 in FY 2026, and roughly $193,000 per 
year thereafter) only reflect the administrative costs for the Department of Revenue to hire an 
Assayer in the verification of the weight and purity of any special legal tender or electronic 
currency as the state shall now accept gold and silver as payment.  Any other state department 
that accepts payments may also incur similar costs, depending upon the rules promulgated by the 
DOR.  Oversight does not have enough information to estimate a loss to the state regarding 
§143.121 (deduction of capital gains from sale of gold and/or silver from MAGI); however 
estimates from the Department of Revenue and the Office of Administration - Budget note this 
loss is unknown but potentially significant.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on Other State 
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 1527H.02C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 
Page 2 of 
March 14, 2025
SK:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on All Federal 
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028General RevenueCould exceed 2 FTECould exceed 2 FTECould exceed 2 FTETotal Estimated Net 
Effect on FTECould exceed 2 FTECould exceed 2 FTECould exceed 2 FTE
*DOR assumed the need for an additional FTE Assayer to verify the weight and purity of any 
gold or silver coinage during any such transaction as the state shall now accept gold and silver 
coins as payment as well as a Customer Service Representative.  Other state departments that 
accept payments may also find the need for additional FTE for weight and purity verification as 
well as storage/handling.
☒ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Local Government (Unknown) (Unknown) (Unknown) L.R. No. 1527H.02C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 
Page 3 of 
March 14, 2025
SK:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Section 143.121 Capital Gains and MAGI
Officials from the Office of Administration – Budget and Planning (B&P) notes this section 
would allow Missouri taxpayers to subtract any capital gains from the sale or exchange of gold 
and/or silver from the taxpayer's Missouri Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI), if such capital gains 
were included in the taxpayer's Federal Adjusted Gross Income (FAGI), beginning with tax year 
2025.
B&P is unable to determine the amount of capital gains claimed by Missouri taxpayers. 
However, the total amount of capital gains claimed during tax year 2022, the most recent 
complete year available, was $4,162,253,341. If even 1% of the capital gains resulted from the 
sale or exchange of gold and/or silver, B&P estimates that the loss to GR would have been 
$1,956,259 ($4,162,253,341 x 1% x 4.7%). Therefore, B&P estimates that this provision may 
have an unknown, but significant, loss to TSR and GR beginning with FY27 (for tax year 2026 
capital gains).
Officials from the Department of Revenue (DOR) state this proposal requires that a taxpayer be 
allowed to subtract the amount of capital gain they receive from the sale or exchange of specie 
from their Federal Adjusted Gross Income (FAGI) when calculating their Missouri Adjusted 
Gross Income (MAGI) thus lowering their taxable income. DOR notes this proposal says that the 
definition of “specie” is to use the definition in Section 408.010.  Section 408.010 defines specie 
as silver coins of the United States that are legal tender.  Therefore, this would be nickels, dimes 
and quarters.
DOR notes that capital gains would occur on these products when they are sold to a coin dealer.  
DOR is unable to determine the number of coins sold annually or for what value.  
Taxpayers report the sources of the capital gain on their federal tax returns and only their FAGI 
number is reported on the Missouri tax return.  Therefore, DOR is unable to determine how 
much capital gain is reported from the sale or exchange of specie in Missouri.  
The Internal Revenue Service SOI data for 2021 (the most complete year) shows that total 
capital gains reported on the returns for the State of Missouri equaled $22,498,638,000.  If just 
1% of these capital gains was a result of either specie this could result in a loss to general 
revenue of $10,574,360 ($22,498,638,000 * 1% * 4.7* tax rate).
This will require an additional line be added to the MO-A form ($2,200), information would 
need to be added to their website and this would need to be added to their individual income tax 
computer system ($7,327).  These costs are estimated at $9,527. L.R. No. 1527H.02C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 
Page 4 of 
March 14, 2025
SK:LR:OD
Oversight has no basis to provide an estimate; therefore, will reflect an unknown loss, 
potentially significant, to the General Revenue Fund from this section.
Section 408.010 – Legal Tender
In response to the previous version, officials from the Office of Administration assumed the 
proposal will have no fiscal impact on their organization. 
In response to similar legislation, HB 630 (2025), officials from the Office of Administration 
(OA) assumed this legislation has the potential to impact OA, as it authorizes the payment of 
certain debts in specie, and requires the receiving party to pay the cost of assaying the coinage. 
This could result in costs to the state to verify the weight, purity, and value of the gold or silver 
coinage. If assaying services are not immediately available, legal issues could arise if the coins 
are determined after payment to be different in valuation than anticipated at the time of payment. 
Section 408.010 also prohibits the enforcement, or attempts to enforce, federal laws or infringing 
on the rights of persons to keep and use specie and electronic currency. This could result in 
additional claims being brought against the state, although such costs are unknown as the number 
of potential claims that may be asserted against the state, the severity of those claims, and the 
ultimate costs associated with any settlement or judgment resulting from those claims cannot be 
forecasted with any degree of assurance to their accuracy.
B&P states Section 408.010 would allow gold and silver coinage to be legal tender in Missouri. 
B&P notes that certain gold and silver coins are already considered legal tender under Federal 
law. However, federal law prohibits the use of privately created gold and/or silver coins from 
being used as currency.
This section requires DOR to promulgate rules for the method(s) of accepting gold/silver specie 
for debts owed to the state. This section also allows employers to pay employees in gold/silver 
specie, if the employee requests such pay.
In response to similar legislation, SS/SCS/SB 735 (2024), officials from B&P stated in addition, 
state agencies would be required accept gold and silver at their spot price plus market premium, 
rather than at their par value. B&P notes that the spot price changes daily, which in turn impacts 
the market premium. B&P further notes that under current law the par value for gold is $42.22 
per ounce. While the spot price for gold on 2/2/2023 was $1,932.00 and the spot price for silver 
was $0.76 per gram. In addition, the market premium for gold is currently 2% - 3.75%. This 
proposal does not specify which rate the state should use when calculating a dollar value for the 
market premium. Therefore, on 2/2/2023 the state would have to accept an ounce of gold for $ 
1,070.64 to $2,004.45 per ounce. B&P notes that because the spot price changes daily, it is 
possible that an agency could accept a certain dollar value of gold and/or silver one day, but 
receive a different amount when those assets were converted to dollars. Therefore, this provision 
may have an unknown impact on TSR, GR, and other state funds. L.R. No. 1527H.02C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 
Page 5 of 
March 14, 2025
SK:LR:OD
Officials from the DOR state this provision allows specie legal tender and electronic currency to 
be accepted as legal tender in Missouri and shall be allowed for the payment of all debts, taxes, 
fees and obligations owed. This proposal does not specify that the specie be minted by the U.S. 
Mint or that the electronic currency be a currency that is considered legal tender. Therefore, this 
proposal would allow people to create their own coins and currency.
The State and DOR already accept all coins minted by the U.S. Mint as they are considered legal 
tender. This includes the commemorative coins printed but not widely used in financial 
transactions. Additionally, DOR allows for the use of credit and debit cards that are based on 
physical currency.
DOR state they receive, process and deposit the majority of all state revenue.  DOR receives 
sales tax, individual income tax, corporate tax and various taxes and fees collected by state 
agencies that is then brought to DOR for deposit. However, DOR does not accept and will 
continue to not accept any coinage that is in violation of 18 U.S. § 486.  Acceptance of coins not 
considered legal tender per this federal statute can result in felony charges being brought by the 
Federal Government.  While this proposal does not address the issue, DOR assumes they would 
only accept specie coins created by the U.S. Mint or Federal Government and can refuge any 
other coins. 
This proposal removes the prohibition of people paying their entire state debt in coins.  Prior to 
this prohibition being in place, DOR would receive envelopes full of coins.  Removing this 
language would allow customers to send in envelopes of coins and require DOR to get coin 
counting machines. They would need at least one for their Taxation Division, and one each for 
their Motor Vehicle and Driver License Divisions.  These machines are estimated to cost $250 
each.  
This proposal would require the State of Missouri to accept specie legal tender and electronic 
currency as payment of any debt.  It says that the cost incurred in the course of verification of the 
“weight and purity” of any specie legal tender or electronic currency received must be borne by 
the receiver (the State).  DOR assumes that since the majority of state revenue comes to the 
Department, they would be responsible for the verification process.
It should be noted that verification of the “weight and purity” of gold and silver can only be done 
by a certified Assayer.  DOR is unable to determine who is certified to verify the “weight and 
purity” of specie legal tender or electronic currency.  They assume it would require the 
equivalent of an Assayer.  DOR does not currently have one on staff.  Research indicates their 
average salary is around $75,000 annually.  DOR assumes they will need to have at least one 
full-time Assayer in their Jefferson City headquarters building where the majority of all 
payments are received. If DOR is required to accept specie legal tender or electronic currency at 
all of their locations (5) and licenses offices (173) they would need an Assayer at each location.  
For purposes of the fiscal note, they assume all taxpayers wishing to pay using these methods 
would need to conduct their business in the Jefferson City Headquarters Building.  L.R. No. 1527H.02C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 
Page 6 of 
March 14, 2025
SK:LR:OD
DOR notes that most revenue collected by the state agencies is processed by DOR.  If DOR is 
required to provide the Assayer for all citizens wishing to pay with specie legal tender or 
electronic currency, those citizens would be required to go to the DOR Jefferson City 
Headquarters.  This will require DOR to build a central computer system to issue receipts and 
track payments.  This program could be expected to cost up to $100,000 for all agencies.
Should there be a large volume of people coming to their office, they would need an Associate 
Customer Service Rep. ($37,020) to handle appointments and paperwork.
It should be noted that specie legal tender and electronic currency are commodities that change 
in value daily like stocks on the stock exchange.  Once the price is determined through the 
verification process, by the time DOR is able to process the payments and get them to a bank to 
convert to dollars, the price could have changed again.  This could result in a loss to the state if 
prices drop.  
DOR notes they would need to get a contract with a bank that can handle the transfer of these 
types of payments.  Their current contract does not cover it.  DOR is unable to estimate the cost 
of such a contract.
It should be noted that this provision would become effective on August 28, 2025.  The 
Department notes that until the Assayer is hired, a bank contract is issued, security measures are 
increased, and the computer systems are programmed to accept these other types of payment, the 
Department will not be able to accept these payments.  Getting these items may take time.  
Missouri would be the first state to accept specie legal tender and electronic currency not created 
by the Federal Government.  While other states have passed laws providing their state with 
language allowing rolling compliance with acceptance of currency types like these should the 
federal government make these types of legal tender, none have allowed the paying of a currency 
that is not legal tender.  Therefore, DOR is unable to obtain information as to the number of 
people wishing to use alternative currency or the costs of providing these alternatives.  DOR 
assumes that this proposal:


of the specie and electronic currency.  Up to $10,000


large safe to store the specie until it can be transferred to the bank.  


Their current safe is not designed to handle large sums of coins, or specie.

their building. L.R. No. 1527H.02C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 
Page 7 of 
March 14, 2025
SK:LR:OD

were made.  These would include taxation’s MyTax, and the motor vehicle and driver 
license systems’ FUSION.  ITSD estimates at least $38,000 for the necessary updates per 
division (3 divisions x $38,000 = $114,000).
DOR estimates these additional costs for their building, equipment and security could exceed 
$250,000.
This proposal in 408.010.5 requires any entity doing business in Missouri to pay compensation to 
an employee that requests it, in specie legal tender or electronic currency. DOR notes that this 
would impact all employers in the State and not just state employees. The Office of 
Administration is responsible for paying state employees and DOR defers to them for impact of 
this section.
Oversight notes Subsection 408.010.5 is permissive (“may”) to employers and employees.  
Oversight assumes both the employer and employee would have to agree to pay wages in specie 
legal tender.  Therefore, Oversight will assume the proposal would not require OA to pay state 
employees in specie legal tender; therefore, Oversight will not reflect a fiscal impact from this 
part of the proposal.
Officials from the Department of Corrections (DOC) state Section 408.010 would require the 
department to accept payment for debts in gold and silver. The legislation requires the 
department to bear the costs in determining the weight and purity of the gold and silver. The 
DOC currently processes approximately 93,000 payments a year for intervention fees and it is 
unknown what percentage of transactions would be moved to gold/silver. This legislation could 
create an unknown cost with the processing of payments and reconciling the value of the 
silver/gold, determined by the department with the value determined by the bank. 
The proposed legislation would also require DOC to accept electronic currency for the payment 
of debts. The department would need to contract with a company to accept the electronic 
currency and have it converted to US dollars for deposit. Currently, the department’s contracted 
bank does not accept deposits of gold and silver. Therefore, the DOC estimates an unknown 
impact.
Officials from the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DOLIR) state if this bill is 
interpreted to allow the Division of Employment Security (DES), Division of Workers' 
Compensation (DWC) and Division of Labor Standards (DLS) to accept Gold/Silver coinage in 
the repayment of debt, this could cause an unknown impact to DES, DWC and DLS. The DES, 
DWC and DLS would incur the cost of the verification of the weight and purity of the 
Gold/Silver. At this time, DOLIR does not have a way to estimate the cost.
Officials from the Department of Mental Health (DMH) state they are unable to determine 
when and how often the department would receive payment in the form of gold or silver coins. 
Accepting payment in this form would create a substantial burden on DMH due to calculating  L.R. No. 1527H.02C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 
Page 8 of 
March 14, 2025
SK:LR:OD
value, determining purity and authenticity, and cost of depositing or selling. The fiscal impact 
from this additional administrative work is unknown.
While coins minted by the US Treasury are legal tender, they are not widely used in financial 
transactions. The proposal states the state shall accept gold and silver coinage but does not 
specify that coinage must be minted by the US Treasury. Gold and silver coins created outside 
the US Treasury are not excluded. U.S. Const., Art. 1, §10, cl. 1 allows states to recognize gold 
and silver coinage as tender; however, the limits of this provision are largely untested in federal 
courts.
Officials from the Missouri Lottery Commission state this legislation would require the 
Missouri Lottery to absorb administrative expenses of testing the purity and weight of specie for 
retailers to choose to pay in that method as well as methods to transport, account for, and secure 
specie until such specie could be disposed of as appropriate.  To the extent that this bill would 
require the lottery to accept electronic currency based upon the value of gold and silver, the 
Lottery would be required to amend its existing contract with its computer gaming systems 
provider to add this functionality.  Such an amendment could be costly as the Lottery is not 
aware of any other state Lottery with a similar requirement.  Additional administrative expenses 
may reduce the lottery’s net revenue.
408.010.3 – The Lottery assumes retailers will absorb the cost of delivery of specie currency to 
the Lottery if it chooses to pay in such a manner.  To the extent the specie requires testing to 
determine the purity and weight of specie currency, the Lottery assumes that such services will 
be provided through a statewide contract because all agencies will be required to accept specie as 
legal tender.  The Lottery defers to the Office of Administration in regards to the cost of such 
contract.  To the extent that the Lottery is required to accept “electronic currency” representing 
the value of gold or silver specie, the Lottery will be required amend its current contract with its 
computer gaming systems provider to add such functionality.  Such costs would likely be 
reflected as a percentage of ticket sales, but the Lottery is unable to estimate the cost of such 
amendment as it is unaware of any other state lottery that operates under a requirement to accept 
specie currency.
Officials from the Department of Social Services (DSS) state the MO HealthNet Division 
(MHD) is unable to determine how many people will want to pay with gold and silver rather 
than other forms of payment.  Currently, the MHD has no way to determine the verification of 
the weight and the value of the purity of the gold or silver upon acceptance.  If a participant 
chooses to pay with either gold or silver, the MHD would have to seek out different options in 
order for that payment to be assessed, including but not limited to, seeking out an Assayer to 
determine its value.  The MHD assumes these instances would be minimal and therefore, would 
be minimal to no impact to the MHD.  
This proposal in 408.010.4 also prevents all state and local governmental bodies from seizing 
any gold or silver that is owned by a person. Per RSMo 473.398, MHD is directed to collect 
debts owed to the State related to Medicaid claims.  If all or a portion of assets are in gold or  L.R. No. 1527H.02C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 
Page 9 of 
March 14, 2025
SK:LR:OD
silver, it could limit the amount MHD can collect.  The MHD is estimating that up to 1% of 
collections could be impacted by this legislation.  On average, the MHD collects around $18 
million per year. Therefore, the impact to MHD is $0 to $180,000 per year.
FY26:  Total - $0 - $180,000 
FY27:  Total - $0 - $180,000
FY28:  Total - $0 - $180,000
FSD:
Section 408.010: 
Income Maintenance (IM):
Currently, FSD Income Maintenance (IM) does not accept any payment for any programs 
administered by IM.  However, when an individual has been found to have incorrectly received 
benefits administered by FSD, a claim is filed and payment for the overpayment is submitted as 
repayment to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services (DFAS).  
Child Support (CS):
Proposed subsection 408.010.2 would allow specie and electronic currency to be legal tender in 
Missouri. 
This proposal will require the FSD CS program to accept specie and electronic currency as 
payment for child support obligations, for annual federal fee payments made by the obligor and 
for recovery payments. Child support payments are processed by FSD’s State Disbursement 
Unit, the Family Support Payment Center (FSPC) which is run by FSD’s contractor Systems & 
Method, Inc. (SMI). Fees and recovery payments are processed by the Division of Finance and 
Administrative Services (DFAS). FSD assumes specie legal tender to be precious metal (gold, 
silver, platinum and palladium) coin that is issued by the federal government and any other 
specie. FSD also assumes electronic currency is digital currency that encompasses any currency, 
money or money–like asset that is stored or exchanged on computer systems. 
Under proposed 408.010.3, the FSD CS program will be required to accept specie legal tender 
and electronic currency. Specie coinage is a commodity that changes in value daily. Depending 
on the time it takes to convert the specie, the spot price could have changed leaving a balance or 
excess amount. Electronic currency (cryptocurrency) is influenced by supply and demand that 
creates a price volatility that could change the value. Depending on the time it takes to convert 
the electronic currency, the value of the currency could change leaving a balance or excess 
amount.
The FSD CS program is unable to determine how many people will want to pay with specie legal 
tender or electronic currency rather than other forms of payment but it is assumed it would be 
minimal. Currently, the FSD CS program has no experience or ability to accept specie legal 
tender or electronic currency as payment.  L.R. No. 1527H.02C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 
Page 10 of 16
March 14, 2025
SK:LR:OD
In order to comply with accepting specie legal tender, the FSD CS program would need to enter 
into a contract with a financial entity that would accept and convert the specie into a form of 
payment accepted by FSPC. FSD CS or the financial entity may also need to contract with an 
assayer that would be able to verify the weight and value of the purity of the specie. 
In order to comply with accepting electronic currency, FSD assumes, for the purpose of this 
fiscal note, OA Accounting would enter into a contract with a financial broker that would accept 
electronic currency and convert the electronic currency into a form of payment accepted by FSD. 
The FSD CS program notes that under 408.010.6 (1), obligors could move assets into specie 
legal tender or electronic currency in order to avoid having assets attached by the FSD CS 
program for child support. It is unknown how many obligors may move assets into specie legal 
tender or electronic currency and the negative impact for this is unknown. 
The FSPC collects and disburses payments for child support cases meeting the criteria under 
454.530, RSMo, and 45 CFR 302.32. FSPC is required under federal and state law to disburse 
support payments within two business days after receipt. The FSD CS program would be 
required to process and disburse child support payments received in specie or electronic currency 
within the two day time frame to be in compliance with the Title IV–D state plan. As the specie 
and electronic currency would have to be authenticated and converted into a form of payment 
accepted by the FSPC prior to the FSPC processing and disbursing the payment, the FSD CS 
program anticipates the processing time could exceed the two–day time frame required for 
payment disbursement thereby risking state compliance.
If the FSD child support program does not disburse payments within two business days of 
receipt, Missouri could have IV–D state compliance implications. Title IV–D state plan 
noncompliance will result in the loss of federal funding for the state’s child support program 
($52.4 million for FFY 2024). Having an approved Title IV–D state plan is a condition of 
eligibility for a Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant under Title IV–A 
of the Social Security Act. If the Federal government determines Missouri’s IV–D state plan is 
noncompliant, Missouri’s TANF funding ($216.3 million) could potentially be reduced. FSD is 
unsure how much the reduction in funding would amount to; therefore, this amount is not 
included in the overall fiscal impact of this legislation. In order to continue child support 
program services at its current level, any loss of federal funding would have to be replaced with 
general revenue. Therefore, the fiscal impact of non–compliance would range from $0 to $52.4 
million general revenue.
FSD assumes that any form of electronic currency would need to be liquidated into cash form to 
be able to receive as payment. FSD assumes that a financial broker would be procured by the 
state of Missouri to handle this function for all departments. 
FSD defers to OA-Accounting for the fiscal impact to receive electronic currency as a form of 
payment. L.R. No. 1527H.02C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 
Page 11 of 16
March 14, 2025
SK:LR:OD
The FSD estimates that the impact of entering into a contract with a financial entity and/or 
assayer to process specie legal tender will be $0 to $100,000 per year. 
Therefore, the total DSS impact would be $0 to $280,000 per year. 
Officials from the City of Kansas City assume the proposed legislation has a negative fiscal 
impact of an indeterminate amount. 
In responses to the previous version, officials from the City of Kansas City
Constitutional Money Act has a negative fiscal impact because of the cost of verification of 
weight and purity and it must be performed by an Assayer.  There are only four in Missouri.  The 
average salary is $61,000.  The City will not be to seize gold and silver.  Therefore, if the City 
has a judgment, the person can convert it to gold or silver and avoid taxes.  In addition, because 
gold and silver are commodities there can be wide value fluctuations between the time of 
payment versus sale.
Oversight will reflect a potential cost to all state agencies as well as local political subdivisions 
of an unknown amount for the administrative burden of accepting, valuing, storing and 
depositing gold and silver payments.
Section 408.010.6 Seizing of specie legal tender
Officials from B&P state this section further prevents all state and local government bodies and 
courts from seizing any gold and silver held by a person, except as provided under the Criminal 
Activity Forfeiture Act. B&P notes that this would allow individuals and businesses to store or 
move assets into gold and/or silver to avoid having assets seized. This would allow taxpayers to 
move their assets to gold and/or silver coins to avoid paying back taxes to the state. Therefore, 
this provision may have a negative unknown impact to TSR, GR, as well as other state and local 
funds.
Officials from the Department of Revenue state 408.010.6(1) prevents all state and local 
governmental bodies from seizing any specie legal tender or electronic currency that is owned by 
a person.  If a taxpayer owes DOR back taxes, they will have the opportunity to move all their 
income to specie legal tender or electronic currency and prohibit DOR from being able to collect 
the back taxes owed.  DOR is unable to determine how much this will impede their collection 
efforts.  This impact is expected to be unknown.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero 
to unknown cost to the general revenue fund as well as local governments in the fiscal note for 
the removal of gold and silver coins as seizable assets.  
Bill as a whole: L.R. No. 1527H.02C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 
Page 12 of 16
March 14, 2025
SK:LR:OD
Officials from the Department of Commerce and Insurance (DCI) believe the costs of this bill 
can be absorbed within their current appropriations. However, should the cost be more than 
anticipated, DCI would request an increase to their FTE and/or appropriations as appropriate 
through the budget process.
Officials from the Office of Attorney General (AGO)
arising from this proposal can be absorbed with existing resources. However, the AGO may seek 
additional appropriations if the proposal results in a significant increase in litigation or 
investigation.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight assumes the 
AGO will be able to perform any additional duties required by this proposal with current staff 
and resources and will reflect no fiscal impact to the AGO for fiscal note purposes.
Officials from the Department of Economic DevelopmentDepartment of Elementary 
and Secondary Education, the Department of Higher Education and Workforce 
Development, Department of Public Safety-Director’s OfficeDepartment of Health and 
Senior Services, the Department of Natural Resources, the Missouri Highway Patrol, Office 
of the GovernorMissouri Department of ConservationMissouri Department of 
Transportation, the Missouri Ethics Commission, and the each 
assume the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations for this 
proposal.
Officials from the Missouri Department of AgricultureOffice of Administration 
for the potential fiscal impact of this proposal. 
In response to the previous version, officials from the Office of the State Courts Administrator 
assumed the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their organization. 
Officials from the City of Osceola
organization. 
Oversight notes that the above mentioned agencies have stated the proposal would not have a 
direct fiscal impact on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the 
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact on the fiscal note.
Rule Promulgation
Officials from the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules assume this proposal is not 
anticipated to cause a fiscal impact beyond its current appropriation.  L.R. No. 1527H.02C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 
Page 13 of 16
March 14, 2025
SK:LR:OD
Officials from the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) note many bills considered by the 
General Assembly include provisions allowing or requiring agencies to submit rules and 
regulations to implement the act. The SOS is provided with core funding to handle a certain 
amount of normal activity resulting from each year's legislative session. The fiscal impact for 
this fiscal note to the SOS for Administrative Rules is less than $5,000. The SOS recognizes that 
this is a small amount and does not expect that additional funding would be required to meet 
these costs. However, the SOS also recognizes that many such bills may be passed by the 
General Assembly in a given year and that collectively the costs may be in excess of what the 
office can sustain with its core budget. Therefore, the SOS reserves the right to request funding 
for the cost of supporting administrative rules requirements should the need arise based on a 
review of the finally approved bills signed by the governor.
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028GENERAL REVENUELoss – DOR §143.121 – capital gains 
on the exchange of gold and silver now 
a deduction for MAGI calculation $0
(Unknown – 
potentially 
significant)
(Unknown – 
potentially 
significant)
Costs – DOR §408.010Could 
exceed…
Could 
exceed….
Could 
exceed…..
   Personal Service($93,350)($114,260)($116,546)  Fringe Benefits($63,735)($77,379)($78,296)  Expense & Equipment($26,718)($1,140)($1,163)  Coin Machines($750)  Computer for gold/central computer  
   system($214,000)
   Assayer equipment($10,000)$0$0  MAGI updates($9,527)$0$0  Security measures & building   
   modifications($250,000)$0$0
Total Costs($668,080)($192,779)($196,005)FTE Change2 FTE2 FTE2 FTECosts – Various State Agencies - 
§408.010 – potential cost to verify the 
weight and purity of any gold or silver 
coinage received as payment  (Unknown) (Unknown) (Unknown)
Loss – DOR §408.010.6 – removal of 
gold and silver coins as seizable assets
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown) L.R. No. 1527H.02C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 
Page 14 of 16
March 14, 2025
SK:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT TO 
GENERAL REVENUE
 (Could exceed 
$668,080)
(Could 
substantially 
exceed 
$192,779)
(Could 
substantially 
exceed 
$196,005)
Estimated Net FTE Change on General 
Revenue
Could exceed  
2 FTE
Could exceed  
2 FTE
Could exceed  
2 FTE
FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028LOCAL POLITICAL 
SUBDIVISIONS
Costs – Local governments - 
§408.010.2 – potential cost to verify the 
weight and purity of any gold or silver 
coinage received as payment -  specie 
legal tender and electronic currency 
shall be accepted as legal tender for all 
payment of all public debts (Unknown)(Unknown) (Unknown)
Costs - §408.010.6 – removal of gold 
and silver coins as seizable assets
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT TO 
LOCAL POLITICAL 
SUBDIVISIONS(Unknown)
 
(Unknown) (Unknown)
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
Small businesses that want to utilize gold and silver as currency would be impacted by this 
proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
This bill relates to the sole purpose of regulating the treatment and use of gold and silver. 
INCOME TAXATION ON GOLD AND SILVER SPECIE (Section 143.121)  L.R. No. 1527H.02C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 
Page 15 of 16
March 14, 2025
SK:LR:OD
Currently, all purchases of bullion and investment coins are exempt from all State and local sales 
taxes. This bill additionally exempts from State income tax the portion of capital gain on the sale 
or exchange of gold and silver specie that are otherwise included in the taxpayer's Federal 
adjusted gross income. 
LEGAL TENDER (Section 408.010) 
The bill establishes the "Constitutional Money Act" and declares that "specie legal tender" and 
"electronic currency", as those terms are defined in the bill, will be accepted as payment for all 
public debts and may be received as payment for all private debts contracted for in the state of 
Missouri, at the discretion of the receiving entity. 
The Director of the Department of Revenue is required to promulgate rules on the methods of 
acceptance of specie legal tender as payment for any debt, tax, fee, or obligation owed. Costs 
incurred in the course of verification of the weight and purity of any specie during any such 
transaction will be borne by the receiving entity. 
Except as expressly provided by contract, no person or entity will be required to use specie legal 
tender or electronic currency in the payment of any debt and nothing in this bill will prohibit the 
use of Federal reserve notes in the payment of any debt. 
The bill permits any entity doing business in this State to, upon request by an employee, 
compensate its employees, in full or in part, in the dollar equivalent specie legal tender either in 
physical or in electronic transfer form. Any entity choosing to compensate its employees in 
specie legal tender will be responsible for verifying the weight and purity of any physical specie 
legal tender before compensating employees. 
Under no circumstance will the state of Missouri or any department, agency, court, political 
subdivision, or instrumentality thereof:
(1) Seize from any person any specie legal tender or electronic currency that is owned by the 
person, except as otherwise provided by law. Any person whose specie legal tender or electronic 
currency is seized in violation of this provision will have a cause of action in a court of 
competent jurisdiction, with any successful such action resulting in the award of attorney's fees; 
(2) Enforce or attempt to enforce any Federal acts, laws, executive orders, administrative orders, 
rules, regulations, statutes, or ordinances infringing on the right of a person to keep and use 
specie legal tender and electronic currency as provided in the bill; 
3) Restrict in any way the ability of a person or financial institution to acquire specie legal tender 
and electronic currency or use specie legal tender and electronic currency in transactions; or 
(4) Enact any law discriminating or favoring one means of legal tender in the course of a 
transaction over another means of legal tender.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space. L.R. No. 1527H.02C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 433 & 630 
Page 16 of 16
March 14, 2025
SK:LR:OD
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Attorney General’s Office
Office of Administration – Budget & Planning
Department of Commerce and Insurance
Department of Economic Development
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 
Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development
Department of Health and Senior Services
Department of Mental Health
Department of Natural Resources
Department of Corrections
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations
Department of Revenue
Department of Public Safety – Directors Office
Missouri Highway Patrol
Department of Social Services
Office of the Governor 
Missouri Department of Agriculture
Missouri Department of Conservation
Missouri Ethics Commission
Missouri Department of Transportation
Missouri National Guard
Office of Administration
Office of the Secretary of State
Joint Committee on Administrative Rules
Missouri Lottery Commission
Office of the State Courts Administrator
City of Kansas City
City of Osceola
Julie MorffJessica HarrisDirectorAssistant DirectorMarch 14, 2025March 14, 2025