Missouri 2025 2025 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB434 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/27/2025

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:1549H.05C Bill No.:HCS for HB Nos. 434 & 459Subject:Courts; Firearms; Federal - State Relations Type:Original  Date:April 27, 2025Bill Summary:This proposal establishes the "Anti-Red Flag Gun Seizure Act". 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028General Revenue*$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown)Total Estimated Net 
Effect on General 
Revenue$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown)
*Oversight assumes the addition of a civil penalty of $50,000 per occurrence for any violations 
of §1.486 could reach the $250,000 threshold. 
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Other State Funds*$0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)State Legal Expense 
Fund (0692)**$0$0$0
Colleges and 
Universities*$0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)
State Highways and 
Transportation 
Department Fund 
(0644)*$0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)
Water Patrol Division 
Fund (0400)*$0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)
Total Estimated Net 
Effect on Other State 
Funds$0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)
**Indicates numbers that net to zero. 
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 1549H.05C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 434 & 459
Page 2 of 
April 27, 2025
DD:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Federal Funds* $0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)Total Estimated Net 
Effect on All Federal 
Funds$0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)$0 or (Unknown)
*Oversight assumes the loss of federal funds could reach the $250,000 threshold.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on FTE 000
☒ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028
Local Government*
$0 or Unknown to 
(Unknown)
$0 or Unknown to 
(Unknown)
$0 or Unknown to 
(Unknown) L.R. No. 1549H.05C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 434 & 459
Page 3 of 
April 27, 2025
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
§1.486 – Anti-Red Flag Gun Seizure Act
Officials from the Office of Administration (OA) state this legislation creates provisions and 
damages relating to seizure of firearms and includes a waiver of sovereign immunity for actions 
brought under this section. This has the potential to increase costs to the LEF but would be 
subject to judicial construction; therefore, the cost is unknown.
Oversight does not have any information contrary to that provided by OA.  Therefore, Oversight 
will reflect OA’s potential unknown impact for fiscal note purposes to the State Legal Expense 
Fund. Oversight notes the Legal Expense Fund is funded by the General Revenue Fund as well 
as other state funds. Oversight notes this possible litigation exposure as described by OA could 
also apply to colleges and universities, federal funds, as well as local political subdivisions.
Officials from the Department of Public Safety - Missouri Highway Patrol (MHP)
section 1.486.7(1) creates a right to sue the law enforcement agency for a minimum of $50,000 
per occurrence along with punitive damages and attorney's fees. The Patrol has no way of 
computing the number of allegations it may have to defend. Due to this, the impact is listed as 
unknown to General Revenue, the State Highways and Transportation Department Fund (0644), 
the Water Patrol Division Fund (0400), and Federal Funds (0152). The three impacted state 
funds are the primary funding sources for enforcement personnel.
Additionally, section 1.486.2 and section 1.486.4 could have a fiscal impact as it might eliminate 
federal grant money that pays for the salaries of four (4) troopers and some overtime for troopers 
assigned to a federal task force or are assigned to work with a specified federal law enforcement 
agency.
Finally, section 1.486.7(5) appears to waive sovereign immunity, which could account for 
funding for the defense of future civil litigation and would be a considerable departure from 
current law.
Oversight does not have any information contrary to that provided by MHP. Therefore, 
Oversight will reflect MHP’s impact as $0 or an Unknown loss to the funds listed above.  
Oversight assumes the amounts of federal funding received by the state related to a red flag law 
would reach the $250,000 threshold.
In response to a previous version, officials from the Office of Administration - Budget and 
Planning (B&P) stated Article IX, Section 7 of the Missouri Constitution requires that penalties, 
forfeitures, and fines collected for violations of state law be distributed to the schools. To the 
extent any additional such revenues are deposited into the state treasury, TSR may increase. L.R. No. 1549H.05C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 434 & 459
Page 4 of 
April 27, 2025
DD:LR:OD
Oversight notes that violations of section 1.486.7(1) could result in fines or penalties. Oversight 
also notes per Article IX Section 7 of the Missouri Constitution fines and penalties collected by 
counties are distributed to school districts. Fines vary widely from year to year and are 
distributed to the school district where the violation occurred. Oversight will reflect a positive 
fiscal impact of $0 to Unknown to local school districts. For simplicity, Oversight will not reflect 
the possibility that fine revenue paid to school districts may act as a subtraction in the foundation 
formula.
Officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator (OSCA) state there may be some 
impact but there is no way to quantify that currently. Any significant changes will be reflected in 
future budget requests.
Oversight notes OSCA assumes this proposal may have some impact on their organization 
although it can’t be quantified at this time. As OSCA is unable to provide additional information 
regarding the potential impact, Oversight assumes the proposed legislation will have a $0 to 
(Unknown) cost to the General Revenue Fund. For fiscal note purposes, Oversight also assumes 
the impact will be under $250,000 annually. If this assumption is incorrect, this would alter the 
fiscal impact as presented in this fiscal note. If additional information is received, Oversight will 
review it to determine if an updated fiscal note should be prepared and seek approval to publish a 
new fiscal note.
In response to a previous version, officials from the Office of Attorney General (AGO) 
assumed any potential litigation costs arising from this proposal can be absorbed with existing 
resources. The AGO may seek additional appropriations if the proposal results in a significant 
increase in litigation or investigation costs.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight assumes the 
AGO will be able to perform any additional duties required by this proposal with current staff 
and resources and will reflect no fiscal impact to the AGO for fiscal note purposes.
Officials from the City of Kansas City state this legislation has a potentially negative fiscal 
impact as it potentially increases the City's liability.
Officials from the Branson Police Department
negative impact fiscally on their agency.
Officials from the Department of Social Services, the Missouri Department of Conservation, 
the Phelps County Sheriff’s Department, and the Kansas City Police Department each 
assume the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations.  
In response to a previous version, officials from the Missouri Office of Prosecution Services 
and the 
impact on their respective organizations.  L.R. No. 1549H.05C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 434 & 459
Page 5 of 
April 27, 2025
DD:LR:OD
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero 
impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.  
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions; 
however, other cities, counties, and local law enforcement were requested to respond to this 
proposed legislation but did not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri 
Legislative Information System (MOLIS) database is available upon request.
This proposal has an emergency clause.
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028GENERAL REVENUECost – MHP (§1.486) Potential loss of 
funding   
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
Cost – OSCA (§1.486) Potential cost 
relating to “Anti-Red Flag Gun Seizure 
Act”
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
Transfer Out – to the State Legal 
Expense Fund (§1.486) Potential 
increase in litigation   
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
GENERAL REVENUE 
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
OTHER STATE FUNDSCost Increase - (§1.486) Potential 
increase in transfer to LEF   
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
OTHER STATE FUNDS
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown) L.R. No. 1549H.05C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 434 & 459
Page 6 of 
April 27, 2025
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028STATE LEGAL EXPENSE FUND 
(0692)
Transfer In – (§1.486) From General 
Revenue   
$0 to 
Unknown
$0 to 
Unknown
$0 to 
Unknown
Cost Increase - (§1.486) Potential 
increase in litigation   
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
THE LEGAL EXPENSE FUND$0$0$0
COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIESCost Increase - (§1.486) Potential 
increase in litigation   
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
STATE HIGHWAYS AND 
TRANSPORTATION 
DEPARTMENT FUND (0644)
Cost – MHP (§1.486) Potential loss of 
funding   
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
THE STATE HIGHWAYS AND 
TRANSPORTATION FUND
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown) L.R. No. 1549H.05C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 434 & 459
Page 7 of 
April 27, 2025
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028WATER PATROL DIVISION 
FUND (0400)
Cost – MHP (§1.486) Potential loss of 
funding   
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
THE WATER PATROL DIVISION 
FUND
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
FEDERAL FUNDSCost Increase - (§1.486) Potential 
increase in litigation   
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
Cost – MHP (§1.486) Potential loss of 
funding   
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT TO 
FEDERAL FUNDS
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028LOCAL POLITICAL 
SUBDIVISIONS
Revenue – School districts (§1.486) 
Fines from violations   
$0 to 
Unknown
$0 to 
Unknown
$0 to 
Unknown
Cost - (§1.486) Potential increase in 
litigation and/or civil penalty costs  
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
LOCAL POLITICAL 
SUBDIVISIONS
$0 or 
Unknown to 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
Unknown to 
(Unknown)
$0 or 
Unknown to 
(Unknown) L.R. No. 1549H.05C 
Bill No. HCS for HB Nos. 434 & 459
Page 8 of 
April 27, 2025
DD:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
ANTI-RED FLAG GUN SEIZURE ACT (Section 1.486)
This bill establishes the "Anti-Red Flag Gun Seizure Act". 
This bill contains an emergency clause.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Attorney General’s Office
Department of Public Safety - Missouri Highway Patrol
Department of Social Services
Missouri Department of Conservation
Office of Administration
Missouri Office of Prosecution Services
Office of the State Courts Administrator
City of Kansas City
Phelps County Sheriff’s Department
Branson Police Department
Kansas City Police Department
St. Louis County Police Department
Julie MorffJessica HarrisDirectorAssistant DirectorApril 27, 2025April 27, 2025