Missouri 2025 2025 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB954 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 03/02/2025

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:2310H.01I Bill No.:HB 954  Subject:Military Affairs; Veterans; National Guard; Employees - Employers; Labor and 
Management; Department of Labor and Industrial Relations; Attorney General 
Type:Original  Date:March 2, 2025Bill Summary:This proposal provides Federal Servicemember Civil Relief Act (SCRA) 
protections to national guard members called to state duty. 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on General 
Revenue $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on Other State 
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 2310H.01I 
Bill No. HB 954  
Page 2 of 
March 2, 2025
BB:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on All Federal 
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on FTE 000
☐ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Local Government$0 to Unknown$0 to Unknown$0 to Unknown
*Penalty and fine revenue to school districts. L.R. No. 2310H.01I 
Bill No. HB 954  
Page 3 of 
March 2, 2025
BB:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Attorney General’s Office (AGO) assume any potential litigation costs 
arising from this proposal can be absorbed with existing resources. The AGO may seek 
additional appropriations if the proposal results in a significant increase in litigation or 
investigation costs.
Oversight notes that the AGO assumes the Departments could absorb any cost associated with 
potential litigation in the future. Therefore, Oversight assumes AGO could absorb the costs 
related to this proposal. If multiple bills pass which require additional staffing and duties at 
substantial costs, AGO could request funding through the appropriation process.
Officials from the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DOLIR) assume the 
Division of Labor Standards (DLS) would be able to absorb the impact of creating and providing 
the posters required to be posted in the provisions of this proposal.
Oversight notes that Section 40.490 3. requires the DOLIR provide notice to all employers about 
a “certain protected employment and reemployment rights”. 
Oversight notes the DOLIR assumes it can absorb the fiscal impact stemming from the proposal. 
If multiple bills pass which require additional staffing and duties at substantial costs, DOLIR 
could request funding through the appropriation process. 
 
Officials from the Office of Administration – Budget & Planning (B&P) assumethis 
legislation would add requirements for employers under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. 
Article IX, Section 7 of the Missouri Constitution requires that penalties, forfeitures, and fines 
collected for violations of state law be distributed to the schools. To the extent any additional 
such revenues are deposited into the state treasury, TSR may increase.
Oversight notes per Article IX Section 7 of the Missouri Constitution fines and penalties 
collected by counties are distributed to school districts. Fines vary widely from year to year and 
are distributed to the school district where the violation occurred. Oversight will reflect a 
positive fiscal impact of $0 (no violation of this Section) to Unknown (Missouri employer 
violated this Section and penalties were assessed) to local school districts. For simplicity, 
Oversight will not reflect the possibility that fine revenue paid to school districts may act as a 
subtraction in the foundation formula.
Officials from the Department of Economic DevelopmentDepartment of Elementary 
and Secondary Education, the Department of Higher Education and Workforce 
Development, the Department of Health and Senior Services, the
Health, the Department of Natural Resources, the Department of Corrections, the 
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, the Department of Revenue the  L.R. No. 2310H.01I 
Bill No. HB 954  
Page 4 of 
March 2, 2025
BB:LR:OD
Department of Public Safety (Office of the Director Alcohol & Tobacco Control, Fire 
Safety, Gaming Commission, Missouri Highway Patrol State Emergency Management 
Agency and Veterans Commission), the Missouri National Guard the Department of Social 
ServicesOffice of the Governor, the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules
Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement, the Missouri Lottery Commission, the 
Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan, the Joint Committee on Education, the 
Department of Agriculture the Missouri Department of Conservation, the Missouri Ethics 
Commission, the Missouri House of Representatives, the Department of Transportation the 
Petroleum Storage Tank Insurance Fund, the Office of Administration - Administrative 
Hearing Commission, the Legislative Research, the Oversight Division, the Office of the 
State Auditor, the Missouri Senate, the Missouri State Employees Retirement System, the 
Office of the State Public Defender, the Missouri Office of Prosecution Services, Office of 
the State Courts Administrator the Office of the State Treasurer and the
Commission each assume the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective 
organizations for this proposal.
Oversight notes that the above mentioned agencies have stated the proposal would not have a 
direct fiscal impact on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the 
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact on the fiscal note.
Officials from the Office of Administration (OA) assumethe proposal will have no fiscal 
impact on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. 
Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note. 
Officials from the Department of Commerce and Insurance and the Department of Mental 
Health, both defer to the OA for the potential fiscal impact of this proposal. 
Officials from the Northwest Missouri State University, the University of Central Missouri, 
and the  each assume the proposal will have no fiscal impact on 
their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, 
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note.  
Officials from the City of Kansas City assume the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their 
organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will 
reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note.  
Rule Promulgation
Officials from the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules assume this proposal is not 
anticipated to cause a fiscal impact beyond its current appropriation. 
Officials from the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) note many bills considered by the 
General Assembly include provisions allowing or requiring agencies to submit rules and 
regulations to implement the act. The SOS is provided with core funding to handle a certain  L.R. No. 2310H.01I 
Bill No. HB 954  
Page 5 of 
March 2, 2025
BB:LR:OD
amount of normal activity resulting from each year's legislative session. The fiscal impact for 
this fiscal note to the SOS for Administrative Rules is less than $5,000. The SOS recognizes that 
this is a small amount and does not expect that additional funding would be required to meet 
these costs. However, the SOS also recognizes that many such bills may be passed by the 
General Assembly in a given year and that collectively the costs may be in excess of what the 
office can sustain with its core budget. Therefore, the SOS reserves the right to request funding 
for the cost of supporting administrative rules requirements should the need arise based on a 
review of the finally approved bills signed by the governor.
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028$0$0$0FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028SCHOOL DISTRICTS Revenue Gain - Section 40.490 – 
penalties and fines $0 to Unknown$0 to Unknown$0 to Unknown
NET ESTIMATED EFFECT ON 
THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS
$0 to 
Unknown
$0 to 
Unknown
$0 to 
Unknown
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
A direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of the violation of this 
proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
This bill extends Federal protections of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) currently 
in Federal law for Federal servicemembers to members of the Missouri National Guard who are 
called to active state duty by the Governor and any Missouri employees who are members of the 
National Guard of another state and are called to active state duty by the Governor of that state, 
upon being relieved of such duty.
The bill requires the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations to make available a notice, 
which every employer will post in employment establishments, that covers certain employment  L.R. No. 2310H.01I 
Bill No. HB 954  
Page 6 of 
March 2, 2025
BB:LR:OD
rights, reemployment rights, and civil relief rights that apply to members of the Missouri 
National Guard.
This bill allows members of the Missouri National Guard or any Missouri employee who is a 
member of the National Guard of another state who believes his or her rights have been violated 
to bring suit in any court of competent jurisdiction and appropriate venue. The office of the 
Attorney General may also bring suit against an employer who violates the provisions of this bill.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Attorney General’s Office
Department of Commerce and Insurance
Department of Economic Development
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development
Department of Health and Senior Services
Department of Mental Health
Department of Natural Resources
Department of Corrections 
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations
Department of Revenue 
Department of Public Safety 
      Office of the Director
      Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Control 
      Fire Safety
      Missouri Gaming Commission 
      Missouri Highway Patrol
      State Emergency Management Agency
      Missouri Veterans Commission
Missouri National Guard
Department of Social Services 
Office of the Governor 
Joint Committee on Administrative Rule
Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement
Joint Committee on Administrative Rules
Joint Committee on Education 
Missouri Lottery Commission
Legislative Research 
Oversight Division
Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan 
Missouri Department of Agriculture  L.R. No. 2310H.01I 
Bill No. HB 954  
Page 7 of 
March 2, 2025
BB:LR:OD
Missouri Department of Conservation 
Missouri Ethics Commission
Missouri House of Representatives 
Missouri Department of Transportation 
Missouri State Employee's Retirement System 
MoDOT & Patrol Employees’ Retirement System 
Office of Administration 
      Administrative Hearing Commission
Facilities Management, Design and Construction
Budget & Planning 
Office of the State Auditor
Missouri Office of Prosecution Services
Office of the State Courts Administrator 
Missouri Senate 
Office of the Secretary of State 
Office of the State Public Defender
Office of the State Treasurer
State Tax Commission
Northwest Missouri State University
University of Central Missouri
University of Missouri System
City of Kansas City 
Julie MorffJessica HarrisDirectorAssistant DirectorMarch 2, 2025March 2, 2025