Missouri 2025 2025 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SB141 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 03/07/2025

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:1235S.01I Bill No.:SB 141  Subject:Law Enforcement Officers and Agencies; Retirement Systems and Benefits - 
General 
Type:Original  Date:March 7, 2025Bill Summary:This proposal modifies provisions relating to the Sheriffs' Retirement 
System. 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on General 
Revenue $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on Other State 
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 1235S.01I 
Bill No. SB 141  
Page 2 of 
March 7, 2025
JLH:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on All Federal 
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on FTE 000
☐ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Local Government$0$0$0 L.R. No. 1235S.01I 
Bill No. SB 141  
Page 3 of 
March 7, 2025
JLH:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Sheriff’s Retirement System state the Missouri Supreme Court in 2021 ruled 
the collection of the $3 criminal fee was unconstitutional.  The collection of the fee was removed 
in July 2021. This is clean up language to remove the fee that can no longer be collected to fund 
the Sheriffs' Retirement System. Therefore, there is no impact to the retirement system.
Officials from the Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement (JCPER) state the 
JCPER’s review of SB 141 indicates it will affect retirement plan benefits as defined in Section 
105.660(9). According to actuarial information provided by the retirement system, SB 141 would 
constitute a “substantial proposed change” in future plan benefits as defined in section 
105.660(10).  Pursuant to section 105.670, an actuarial cost statement must be filed with the 
Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives, the Secretary of the Senate, and the Joint 
Committee on Public Employee Retirement as public information for at least five legislative 
days prior to final passage.
Officials from the Office of the State Courts Administrator assume the proposal will have no 
fiscal impact on their respective organization. 
Oversight notes that the above mentioned agencies have stated the proposal would not have a 
direct fiscal impact on their organization.  Oversight does not have any information to the 
contrary.  Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact on the fiscal note.
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028$0$0$0FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal. L.R. No. 1235S.01I 
Bill No. SB 141  
Page 4 of 
March 7, 2025
JLH:LR:OD
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
The proposed legislation appears to have no direct fiscal impact.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Sheriff’s Retirement System
Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Julie MorffJessica HarrisDirectorAssistant DirectorMarch 7, 2025March 7, 2025