Missouri 2025 2025 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SB47 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/05/2025

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:0064S.03C Bill No.:SCS for SB 47  Subject:Civil Procedure; Courts; Liability Type:Original  Date:February 5, 2025Bill Summary:This proposal amends supreme court rule 52.08 relating to class actions. 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028General Revenue$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown)Total Estimated Net 
Effect on General 
Revenue$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown)
* Oversight assumes the unknown impact will be less than $250,000 annually.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on Other State 
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 0064S.03C 
Bill No. SCS for SB 47  
Page 2 of 
February 5, 2025
HWC:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on All Federal 
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on FTE 000
☐ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Local Government$0$0$0 L.R. No. 0064S.03C 
Bill No. SCS for SB 47  
Page 3 of 
February 5, 2025
HWC:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Section A – Modifies supreme court rule 52.08 relating to class actions
Officials from the Office of the State Courts Administrator (OSCA) assume the proposal may 
have some impact on their organization but there is no way to quantify the amount at this time. 
Any significant changes will be reflected in future budget requests. 
Upon further inquiry, OSCA stated since the proposal affects actions of the courts in 
unanticipated ways, and there is not enough information to forecast if a potential cost could be 
absorbed, the fiscal impact is unknown.
Oversight notes OSCA assumes this proposal may have some impact on their organization 
although it can’t be quantified at this time. As OSCA is unable to provide additional information 
regarding the potential impact, Oversight assumes the proposed legislation will have a $0 to 
(Unknown) cost to the General Revenue Fund. For fiscal note purposes, Oversight also assumes 
the impact will be under $250,000 annually. If this assumption is incorrect, this would alter the 
fiscal impact as presented in this fiscal note. If additional information is received, Oversight will 
review it to determine if an updated fiscal note should be prepared and seek approval to publish a 
new fiscal note. 
Officials from the Attorney General’s Office (AGO) assume any potential litigation costs 
arising from this proposal can be absorbed with existing resources. The AGO may seek 
additional appropriations if the proposal results in a significant increase in litigation or 
investigation costs. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, 
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for this agency.  
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028GENERAL REVENUE FUNDCosts – OSCA – costs related to 
changes to supreme court rule 52.08 on 
class actions lawsuits (Section A)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON 
THE GENERAL REVENUE FUND
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown) L.R. No. 0064S.03C 
Bill No. SCS for SB 47  
Page 4 of 
February 5, 2025
HWC:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
This act amends Supreme Court Rule 52.08 relating to class actions.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Attorney General’s Office
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Julie MorffJessica HarrisDirectorAssistant DirectorFebruary 5, 2025February 5, 2025