COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:0064S.04P Bill No.:Perfected SS for SCS for SB 47 Subject:Civil Procedure; Courts; Liability Type:Original Date:February 12, 2025Bill Summary:This proposal amends supreme court rule 52.08 relating to class actions.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028General Revenue$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown)Total Estimated Net
Effect on General
Revenue$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown)
* Oversight assumes the unknown impact will be less than $250,000 annually.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net
Effect on Other State
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 0064S.04P
Bill No. Perfected SS for SCS for SB 47
Page 2 of
February 12, 2025
HWC:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net
Effect on All Federal
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net
Effect on FTE 000
☐ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any
of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Local Government$0$0$0 L.R. No. 0064S.04P
Bill No. Perfected SS for SCS for SB 47
Page 3 of
February 12, 2025
HWC:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Section A – Modifies supreme court rule 52.08 relating to class actions
In response to the previous version of this proposal, officials from the Office of the State
Courts Administrator (OSCA) assumed the proposal may have some impact on their
organization but there is no way to quantify the amount at this time. Any significant changes will
be reflected in future budget requests.
Upon further inquiry, OSCA stated since the proposal affects actions of the courts in
unanticipated ways, and there is not enough information to forecast if a potential cost could be
absorbed, the fiscal impact is unknown.
Oversight notes OSCA assumes this proposal may have some impact on their organization
although it can’t be quantified at this time. As OSCA is unable to provide additional information
regarding the potential impact, Oversight assumes the proposed legislation will have a $0 to
(Unknown) cost to the General Revenue Fund. For fiscal note purposes, Oversight also assumes
the impact will be under $250,000 annually. If this assumption is incorrect, this would alter the
fiscal impact as presented in this fiscal note. If additional information is received, Oversight will
review it to determine if an updated fiscal note should be prepared and seek approval to publish a
new fiscal note.
In response to the previous version of this proposal, officials from the Attorney General’s
Office (AGO) assumed any potential litigation costs arising from this proposal can be absorbed
with existing resources. The AGO may seek additional appropriations if the proposal results in a
significant increase in litigation or investigation costs. Oversight does not have any information
to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for this agency.
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028GENERAL REVENUE FUNDCosts – OSCA – costs related to
changes to supreme court rule 52.08 on
class actions lawsuits (Section A)
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON
THE GENERAL REVENUE FUND
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown) L.R. No. 0064S.04P
Bill No. Perfected SS for SCS for SB 47
Page 4 of
February 12, 2025
HWC:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
This act amends Supreme Court Rule 52.08 relating to class actions.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Attorney General’s Office
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Julie MorffJessica HarrisDirectorAssistant DirectorFebruary 12, 2025February 12, 2025