Missouri 2025 2025 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SB56 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/09/2025

                    COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:0088S.03I Bill No.:SB 56  Subject:Attorney General; Education, Elementary and Secondary; Department of 
Elementary and Secondary Education; Liability 
Type:Original  Date:February 9, 2025Bill Summary:This proposal prohibits diversity-equity-inclusion requirements in school 
districts and charter schools. 
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on General 
Revenue $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on Other State 
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 0088S.03I 
Bill No. SB 56  
Page 2 of 
February 9, 2025
GS:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on All Federal 
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net 
Effect on FTE 000
☒ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any  
     of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
     the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Local Government$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown)$0 to (Unknown)
*Oversight assumes public schools and charter schools will bear the cost of any litigation or 
judgment. Oversight will range the fiscal impact to public schools and charter schools from $0 to 
an unknown cost for damages and court costs.  L.R. No. 0088S.03I 
Bill No. SB 56  
Page 3 of 
February 9, 2025
GS:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
162.1550 - Prohibits diversity-equity-inclusion requirements in school districts and charter 
schools.
Officials from the Office of Attorney General (AGO)
arising from this proposal can be absorbed with existing resources. However, the AGO may seek 
additional appropriations if the proposal results in a significant increase in litigation or 
investigation.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight assumes the 
AGO will be able to perform any additional duties required by this proposal with current staff 
and resources and will reflect no fiscal impact to the AGO for fiscal note purposes.
Oversight notes that this provision may prompt a cause of action against public schools and 
charter schools for violations of this proposal. Oversight assumes public schools and charter 
schools will bear the cost of any litigation or judgment. Oversight will range the fiscal impact to 
public schools and charter schools from $0 (does not increase litigation) to an unknown cost for 
damages and court costs. 
Officials from the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Office of the State 
Public Defender, Missouri Office of Prosecution Services, and the Office of State Courts 
Administrator assume the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their organization. Oversight 
does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in 
the fiscal note for these agencies.  
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028$0$0$0FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028SCHOOL DISTRICTS
Cost – school districts – Legal Fees 
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
NET EFFECT ON SCHOOLS AND 
DISTRICTS
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown)
$0 to 
(Unknown) L.R. No. 0088S.03I 
Bill No. SB 56  
Page 4 of 
February 9, 2025
GS:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
This act establishes provisions relating to diversity-equity-inclusion requirements in school 
districts and charter schools. The act defines diversity-equity-inclusion or "DEI" as education or 
training requirements, policies, or programs on the subjects of antiracism, implicit bias, or any 
other related instructions that promote differential treatment based on race, gender, religion, 
ethnicity, and sexual preference, but not including instruction on state and federal laws 
prohibiting discrimination.
The act prohibits school districts and charter schools from requiring students, employees, and 
prospective employees to ascribe to, study, be instructed with, or answer questions relating to 
DEI, as set forth in the act. The act further prohibits school districts and charter schools from 
offering any student, employee, or prospective employee any incentive, benefit, grant, or other 
compensation for receiving any instruction or professional development relating to DEI, except 
in cases where the same incentive, benefit, grant, or compensation is equally available to 
individuals who are not involved in the DEI instruction or professional development. A school 
district or charter school shall not reward or give any advantage to any employee or job applicant 
for any statement advocating DEI ideologies in employment-related decisions. Finally, 
employees, contractors, volunteers, vendors, or agents of a school district or charter school shall 
not be required to ascribe to, study, or be instructed with DEI ideologies or materials.
The Attorney General or the prosecuting or circuit attorney in the county in which a violation of 
the act occurs may bring a cause of action against any school district or charter school that 
violates the act. An attorney acting on behalf of a school district or charter school may request an 
opinion of the Attorney General as to whether a particular training material or instructional or 
curricular material complies with the provisions of the act. A parent of a student enrolled in a 
school district or charter school may bring a civil action, including an action for injunctive relief 
or for damages, against the school district or charter school for any violation of the act that 
causes harm to such parent's child.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not 
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Attorney General’s Office
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Office of the State Public Defender L.R. No. 0088S.03I 
Bill No. SB 56  
Page 5 of 
February 9, 2025
GS:LR:OD
Missouri Office of Prosecution Services
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Julie MorffJessica HarrisDirectorAssistant DirectorFebruary 9, 2025February 9, 2025