COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:0356H.04C Bill No.:HCS for SS for SB 66 Subject:Family Law; Domestic Relations; Children and Minors; Marriage and Divorce;
Health, Public; Animals; Department of Health and Senior Services; Children's
Division; Crimes and Punishment; Sexual Offenses
Type:Original Date:April 22, 2025Bill Summary:This proposal modifies and establishes provisions relating to the protection
of children, vulnerable persons, and animals.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND
AFFECTED
FY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
General
Revenue*
(Unknown,
Could exceed
$296,496)
(Unknown,
Could exceed
$296,496)
(Unknown,
Could exceed
$296,496)
(Unknown,
Could exceed
($321,066)
Total Estimated
Net Effect on
General
Revenue
(Unknown,
Could exceed
$296,496)
(Unknown,
Could exceed
$296,496)
(Unknown,
Could exceed
$296,496)
(Unknown,
Could exceed
($321,066)
*The fiscal impact to General Revenue could exceed the $250,000 threshold depending on the
level of appropriation to the Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children Education and
Awareness Fund (§210.1505), if any. L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 2 of
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND
AFFECTED
FY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
Commercial
Sexual
Exploitation of
Children
Education and
Awareness
Fund* $0$0$0$0
Pretrial Witness
Protection
(0868)**(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
Total Estimated
Net Effect on
Other State
Funds(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
*Revenue and expenses net to zero.
**Reimbursements to law enforcement agencies and/or prosecuting or circuit attorney’s offices
is assumed to be less than $250,000 annually based on past disbursements.
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND
AFFECTED
FY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
Total Estimated
Net Effect on
All Federal
Funds $0$0$0$0 L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 3 of
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND
AFFECTED
FY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
Commercial
Sexual
Exploitation of
Children
Education and
Awareness Fund2 FTE2 FTE2 FTE2 FTE
Total Estimated
Net Effect on
FTE 2 FTE2 FTE2 FTE2 FTE
☒ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any
of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND
AFFECTED
FY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
Local
Government*UnknownUnknownUnknownUnknown
*Reimbursement of pretrial witness protection costs. L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 4 of
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
§135.621 – Diaper Bank Tax Credit
In response to similar legislation from this year, HB 1522, officials from the Office of
Administration – Budget & Planning (B&P) assumed this proposal would restart this tax
credit, keeping the current annual redemption limit of $500,000. Therefore, B&P estimates that
this provision could reduce TSR and GR by $175,525 to $500,000 per year starting FY26.
Officials from the Department of Revenue (DOR) assume this proposal modifies the diaper
bank tax credit program. The credit sunset December 31, 2024. This proposal would extend the
sunset date until six years from August 28, 2025.
DOR notes this program was adopted in 2018 and had a cap of $500,000 annually. No changes
have been made to the program since it started. For informational purposes, DOR is showing the
issuances and redemptions over the course of the tax credit.
YearAuthorizedIssued
FY 2024$173,152.90$173,152.90FY 2023$136,018.86$136,018.86FY 2022$182,018.00$182,018.00FY 2021$189,453.90$189,453.90FY 2020$189,628.19$189,628.19FY 2019 $0.00$0.00FY 2018 $0.00$0.00
This proposal would be restarting the program which would result in a cost of $500,000
annually. Additionally, it would require DOR to update the Department’s computer program at a
cost of $1,832.
Oversight notes DOR requests a one-time cost for website updates to comply with the proposed
language; however, Oversight notes that DOR receives appropriation for routine website updates
and will not show those costs in the fiscal note. L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 5 of
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
Oversight notes the following for the Diaper Bank Tax Credit:
YearAuthorizedIssuedRedeemedFY 2024$173,153$173,153$175,525FY 2023$136,019$136,016$150,010FY 2022$182,018$182,018$122,611FY 2021$189,454$189,454$137,331FY 2020$189,628$189,628$40,082
*Source: Tax Credit Analysis Forms – January 2025 submission
Oversight notes this proposal extends the sunset date for this program. The average, based on
the three-year tax credit redemption, was $149,382 ($175,525 + $150,010 + $122,611) / 3),
rounded to nearest dollar, for FY 2022 to FY 2024.
Oversight notes this section currently allows sunset as of December 31, 2024; however, this
proposal extends the sunset to December 31, 2031 (FY 2032). Therefore, Oversight will reflect a
cost that could exceed the average redemption total of $149,382, in continued costs, to general
revenue in FY 2026 and thereafter.
Officials from the Department of Commerce and Insurance (DCI) assume a potential
unknown decrease of premium tax revenues (up to the tax credit limit established in the bill) in
FY2026, FY2027, and FY2028 as a result of the repealment of the sunset provision so that the
diaper bank tax credit could be extended. Premium tax revenue is split 50/50 between General
Revenue and County Foreign Insurance Fund except for domestic Stock Property and Casualty
Companies who pay premium tax to the County Stock Fund. The County Foreign Insurance
Fund is later distributed to school districts throughout the state. County Stock Funds are later
distributed to the school district and county treasurer of the county in which the principal office
of the insurer is located. It is unknown how each of these funds may be impacted by tax credits
each year and which insurers will qualify for the tax credit.
Oversight notes, for purposes of this fiscal note, the fiscal note does not reflect the possibility
that some of the tax credits could be utilized against insurance premium taxes. If this occurs, the
loss in tax revenue would be split between the General Revenue Fund and the County Foreign
Insurance Fund, which ultimately goes to local school districts.
§§192.2405, 192.2510, 210.115, 210.191, 273.410, and 273.415 – Abuse and neglect reporting,
including reporting animal abuse
Officials from the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) state
§273.410 requires those that are mandated reporters that fail to make a report as required by this
section shall be subject to discipline by his or her respective licensing board. This process would
require hearings with a potential cost up to $100,000. These costs which will be dependent on the
number of hearing appeals the State Board receives, which include but are not limited to: L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 6 of
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
• Hearing officer time for hearing and drafting recommendations for the State Board.
• Administrative assistant time to schedule hearings, provide notice to parties and any settlement
negotiations.
• Court reporter costs.
For cost explanation purposes, the average cost for a teacher discipline hearing is
$566.55/hearing:
• Average of 3 hours of hearing officer time * average of $58.08/hour
• Average of 7 hours administrative assistant time * $31.08/hour
• Average of $174.75 in court reporter costs/hearing.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a
range of impact of $0 (no hearings) to Less than $100,000 in costs (hearings by the State Board)
as estimated by DESE in the fiscal note.
Officials from Department of Public Safety – Missouri Veterans Commission (MVC) state
Veteran Homes employees provide protective services and are mandatory reporters under RSMo
192.2405. The proposed legislation would require MVC to develop and provide one hour of
companion animal abuse/neglect training within the first sixty days of employment.
The cost of adding one additional work hour per employee per year (due to additional training
requirements) for all Homes employees, assuming all FTE, hourly and intermittent positions
allocated to the Homes were filled, would be as follows for year one: $47,114. This does not
include costs associated with training new hires.
Oversight does not have information to the contrary and therefore, Oversight will reflect the
estimates as provided by the DPS, MVC.
In response to similar legislation from the current session (SB 65), officials from the Office of
Administration - Budget and Planning (B&P) stated § 273.410 provides that any
professionally licensed person required to make a report, but fails to do so, shall be subject to
discipline by their respective licensing board. The following penalties would apply for failure to
report:
• For the first instance, the licensing board shall issue a written notice to the individual;
• For a second instance, the licensing board shall impose a fine of one hundred dollars; and
• For a third or subsequent instance, the licensing board shall impose a fine of five hundred
dollars.
Article IX, Section 7 of the Missouri Constitution requires that penalties, forfeitures, and fines
collected for violations of state law be distributed to the schools. To the extent any additional
such revenues are deposited into the state treasury, TSR may increase. L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 7 of
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
In response to similar legislation from the 2024 session (SB 995), Oversight contacted the
Department of Commerce and Insurance, since it appears the fines imposed would be
administrative fines rather than criminal fines. DCI stated their position regarding administrative
fines is that the intent of the fine is the same as the intent of criminal fines. Any fines collected
by professional licensing boards would be distributed to schools.
Oversight notes that violations of section §273.410 could result in fines or penalties. Oversight
also notes per Article IX Section 7 of the Missouri Constitution fines and penalties collected by
counties are distributed to school districts. Fine varies widely from year to year and are
distributed to the school district where the violation occurred. Oversight will reflect a positive
fiscal impact of $0 to Unknown to local school districts. For simplicity, Oversight will not reflect
the possibility that fine revenue paid to school districts may act as a subtraction in the foundation
formula.
Officials from the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) stated §§192.2510 and
273.415 require all persons providing protective services to eligible adults to complete at least
one hour of training on how to identify companion animal neglect, how to make a report of
companion animal abuse or neglect, and the relationship between adult abuse and neglect and
companion animal abuse and neglect within the first sixty days of employment. Further, this
section also requires the DHSS, in consultation with animal welfare associations, to develop or
adapt available training materials.
DHSS, Division of Senior and Disability Services (DSDS), Section for Adult Protective Services
(APS) has 257 team members that would require this training. Furthermore, APS hires
approximately 44 Social Service Specialists each year that would be required to take the training
described above. APS estimates it would take one training staff 40 hours to develop or modify
existing training materials in collaboration with DSS. Additionally, APS estimates that this
would equate to an additional 12 hours per year to facilitate such training for our staff on an
ongoing basis.
It is assumed that the Department can absorb the costs of this bill with current resources.
However, if the workload significantly increased or other legislation was enacted, additional
resources would be requested through the appropriation process.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Oversight assumes the DHSS has
sufficient staff and resources to absorb the additional duties required by this proposal. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect no fiscal impact for this agency.
Officials from the Department of Mental Health (DMH) stated §192.2510.1 is added stating
all persons providing protective services to eligible adults, defined in section 192.400, shall be
required to complete at least one hour of training within the first sixty days of employment that
can be completed during regular working hours. Subsection 2 states DHSS in consultation with
animal welfare associations, shall develop or adapt and use available training materials for the
required training under this section. Section 210.191 is added stating all children’s division L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 8 of
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
employees and their contractors who have direct contact with children through the state’s child
protection and welfare system shall be required to complete at least one hour of animal abuse
training within the first sixty days of employment. Section 273.410.1 is added stating if there is
reasonable cause to suspect that a animal may be subjected to abuse, the person shall
immediately make a report to the hotline. Subsection 4 states a person required to report animal
abuse shall be immune from civil or criminal liability. Subsection 6 states if any state agency
determines a mandated reporter employee has failed to make a report, the agency shall include a
finding of facts and the notice shall be retained in a separate file maintained by the agency and
considered a closed record under chapter 610. Subsection 7 is added stating any required person
who is subject to professional licensure, and who fails to make a report, shall be subject to
discipline by their licensing board.
It is unclear to what extent the DMH team members would be included within this mandate as
persons “who have direct contract with such adults”. It is possible that all direct care workers,
plus additional administrative team members would need this training. Adding an additional
hourly training will increase overall training costs for DMH team members. It would also need to
be determined how the training will be tracked and if any extra procedures need to be developed
to allow for reporting.
DMH cannot calculate a fiscal impact on the Department at this stage; therefore, the fiscal
impact is unknown.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Oversight assumes the DMH has
sufficient staff and resources to absorb the additional duties required by this proposal as it relates
to the one hour of additional training personnel would be required to receive. However, if the
DMH would require additional resources to meet the requirements of this proposal, Oversight
assumes they could request those resources through the appropriations process. Oversight will
reflect no fiscal impact for this agency for purposes of this fiscal note.
In response to a similar proposal from this year (HB 1298), officials from the Office of Attorney
General (AGO) assumed any additional litigation costs arising from this proposal can be
absorbed with existing personnel and resources. However, the AGO may seek additional
appropriations if there is a significant increase in litigation.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight assumes the
AGO will be able to perform any additional duties required by this proposal with current staff
and resources and will reflect no fiscal impact to the AGO for fiscal note purposes.
In response to a similar proposal from this year (HB 1298), officials from the St. Louis County
Police Department estimated the proposed bill will require an hour of training for all
commissioned officers. The average pay for Police Officers including fringe benefits is $53.03
an hour. The Department currently has approximately 820 officers. The total cost for one hour of
training is $43,484.60. L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 9 of
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
Oversight notes the fiscal impact for the St. Louis County Police Department. Oversight is
unable to project a statewide cost. Oversight will reflect a potential $0 or (Unknown) cost to
local police and sheriffs’ departments from this proposal to update policies and conduct training.
In response to a similar proposal from this year (HB 1298), officials from the Department of
Economic DevelopmentDepartment of Public Safety (Capitol Police), the Missouri
Higher Education Loan Authority, the Office of the State Public DefenderOffice of the
State Treasurer, the City of O’Fallon, the City of Osceola, the Kansas City Election Board,
the St. Louis County Election Authority, the Phelps County Sheriff’s Department, the East
Buchanan County C-1 School District, Northwest Missouri State University, the Joint
Committee On Education, the Missouri State Employee's Retirement System, each assumed
the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not
have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal
note for these agencies.
In response to similar legislation from the current session (SB 65), officials from the City of
Springfield, the St. Louis City Board of ElectionsSt. Louis County Health Department,
the Eureka Fire Protection District, St. Charles Community College and the Office of the
State Courts Administrator
respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
§ 210.950 - "Safe Place for Newborns Fund"
In response to similar legislation from this year, Perfected HB 121, officials from the Fruitland
Area Fire Protection District stated that, although this legislation would have no serious fiscal
impact to their organization, it could assist agencies to offset the costs involved with installation
of these devices and get more of these lifesaving devices in the State.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight assumes the
Fruitland Area Fire Protection District will not require any additional staff or resources and will
reflect no fiscal impact to the Fruitland Area Fire Protection District for fiscal note purposes.
In response to similar legislation from this year, Perfected HB 121, officials from the Office of
the State Treasurer, the Phelps County Sheriff’s Department and the Branson Police
Department each assumed the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective
organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight
will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions;
however, other sheriffs’ departments, police departments, fire protection districts, emergency
services agencies and hospitals were requested to respond to this proposed legislation but did
not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri Legislative Information System
(MOLIS) database is available upon request. L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 10 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
Oversight notes that, according to an article by Anna Claire Vollers published in the Missouri
Independent
In Missouri, a newborn girl was anonymously surrendered to a drop-off box two weeks
ago [February 2024] at a Mehlville Fire Protection District station in St. Louis County…
It was the first time a drop-off box was used in Missouri since a law legalizing them was
passed in 2021.
The initial cost of a baby box is about $20,000. That price includes the leasing of the box
from Safe Haven Baby Boxes, which owns the patent and contracts with a manufacturer,
as well as costs for installation, electrical and alarm system hookups, and staff training
on how to use it. There’s also a $500 annual service fee, paid to Safe Haven Baby Boxes,
to ensure the box continues working properly.
Oversight is uncertain how much would be appropriated and transferred into the Safe Place for
Newborns Fund, if any, but notes the total amount available to the fund from state sources under
such a match program shall be up to ten thousand dollars for each newborn safety incubator
installed. Oversight assumes a fiscal impact of “$0 to Unknown” for the transfer from General
Revenue and assumes the transfer is not likely to exceed the $250,000 threshold annually.
Oversight assumes funds in the Safe Place for Newborns Fund will be disbursed in the same
year it is received. Therefore, Oversight will reflect the income and expenses to the fund as “$0
to Unknown” and net to $0.
§210.1505 – Statewide Council Against Adult Trafficking and the Commercial Sexual
Exploitation of Children
In response to similar legislation from 2025 (HB 219), officials from the Attorney General’s
Office (AGO) assumed this proposal will increase caseloads. The AGO requests one (1) AAG
IV to manage the additional cases and one (1) Paralegal to support the additional attorney.
Oversight does not have any information contrary to that provided by AGO. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect AGO’s impact for fiscal note purposes.
In response to similar legislation from this year, HCS for HB 1464, officials from the Office of
the State Treasurer (STO) stated the language in Section 210.1505 states the STO “shall”
approve disbursements instead of “may” approve disbursements. If the STO is expected to
administer the fund, an additional FTE (Treasury Coordinator) at an annual salary of $43,000
will be needed to carry out the responsibilities. Salaries are from similar positions; costs of
equipment are based on past purchasing and FMDC amounts. STO cannot absorb costs. FTE is
only if STO would be required to administer the fund. L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 11 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
Oversight assumes this proposal will not create the additional duties necessary for a new FTE
for the STO. Therefore, Oversight will reflect no fiscal impact to the STO for fiscal note
purposes. However, if this assumption is incorrect, the STO may request funding through the
appropriations process.
In response to similar legislation from this year, HCS for HB 1464, officials from the Missouri
Senate (SEN) anticipated a negative fiscal impact to reimburse one senator for travel to
Statewide Council Against Adult Trafficking and the Commercial Sexual Exploitation of
Children Council meetings.
The SEN assumes meetings will be held in Jefferson City during the interim. The average of the
total round trip miles for current sitting senators is 255 miles and the current mileage rate, as set
by the Office of Administration is $0.655 cents per mile. Therefore, the SEN estimates a total
cost for senator mileage of approximately $167. The SEN assumes no fiscal responsibility for the
other committee members.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Oversight assumes the SEN can absorb
the minimal fiscal impact for this proposal within existing funding levels and will reflect no
fiscal impact for this agency.
Oversight notes the provisions of this section establish the Anti-Trafficking Fund, which
consists of moneys appropriated by the General Assembly as well as court-ordered restitution
from human trafficking offenses, any proceeds as provided under section 566.218.2, any gifts,
donations, grants, and bequests. Moneys in the fund shall be used solely to pay for the position
of the executive director and administrative support for the statewide council, education and
awareness regarding human trafficking, and anti-trafficking efforts through the state.
Oversight will reflect the possibility that the General Assembly could appropriate moneys to this
new fund from the General Revenue Fund. For fiscal note purposes, Oversight assumes services
provided under this proposal will equal income/appropriations and net to zero.
§273.361 – Inducing the Death of a Dog or Cat
Officials from the Missouri Department of Agriculture assume the proposal will have no fiscal
impact on their organizations.
Oversight notes that the above mentioned agency has stated the proposal would not have a direct
fiscal impact on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary.
Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact on the fiscal note.
Oversight notes there was 0 violations of §273.347 in FY 2024 and 1 misdemeanor violation in
FY 2023. Oversight assumes any violations will be minimal; therefore, Oversight will not reflect
any revenue derived from court costs as a result of this proposal. L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 12 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
§§451.040, 451.080 & 451.090 – Age of Marriage
In response to similar legislation from 2024, SCS for SB Nos. 767 & 1342, officials from the
Mississippi County Recorder of Deeds Office assumed a slight impact, but the benefits of the
proposal would outweigh the little loss that the office may incur.
Oversight assumes the Mississippi County Recorder of Deeds Office’s impact would be
minimal for this proposal and will reflect no fiscal impact.
Oversight notes the number of marriages from the Provisional Vital Statistics Report on the
Department of Health and Senior Services website over the last 5 years:
Calendar YearsNumber of Marriages
Both Under the Age
of 18
2024 ending April7,508N/A202333,684N/A202236,10351202137,25487202034,42568201936,63671
Oversight assumes there would be a minimal loss to County Recorder of Deeds offices;
therefore, Oversight will reflect no fiscal impact.
§§452.305 & 452.310 – Pregnancy Status with a Dissolution of Marriage or Legal Separation
In response to similar legislation from this year, Perfected HCS for HB Nos. 243 & 280, officials
from the
there is no way to quantify that currently. Any significant changes will be reflected in future
budget requests.
Oversight notes the following chart is from an article in Newsweek from February 2024 (Map
Shows US States Where Pregnant Women Can't Get Divorced - Newsweek) on the current status
each state has on dissolution of marriage and pregnancy status: L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 13 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
§§455.010, 455.035, and 455.513 – Adult and child protection orders
Based on agency responses from similar legislation in 2025 (HCS HB 224), Oversight assumes
these sections will have no fiscal impact on state or local governments.
§491.641 – Pretrial witness protection programs
In response to similar legislation from 2025 (HCS HB 224), officials from the Department of
Public Safety – Office of the Director (DPS) stated while this funding could increase the
spending out of the fund, DPS believes that spending the funding for this function is needed and
appropriate. DPS assumes that approximately $50,000 - $75,000 in reimbursements will be
requested by law enforcement, county prosecutors, and the circuit attorney for FY 2026; between
$75,000 and $100,000 for FY 2027; and between $100,000 and $125,000 for FY 2028.
In response to similar legislation from 2024 (SCS HCS HB Nos. 1706 & 1539), Oversight
contacted DPS officials to determine how DPS came up with the estimates provided above.
Officials said this was a best guess as they have no way to calculate how much might be
requested by law enforcement, county prosecutors and the circuit attorney in witness protection
costs. Therefore, Oversight will assume an unknown impact to the Pretrial Witness Protection L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 14 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
Fund (0868). Based on previous disbursements, Oversight assumes disbursements will be less
than $250,000 annually. Oversight also assumes DPS can absorb the IT cost to update the system
within current funding levels.
Oversight notes the Pretrial Witness Protection Fund was enacted by HB 66 during the 2020
Special session and became effective September 21, 2020. One million dollars was transferred
into the fund and on June 30, 2021, the fund balance was $1,000,497. During FY 2022, another
$1 million was transferred into the fund, as well as interest income, but only slightly over
$14,400 was disbursed from the fund. The ending fund balance was just under $2 million.
During FY 2023, distributions were approximately $39,300 and the year-end fund balance was
$2,012,135. The fund balance as of December 31, 2024, was $2,052,225.
§492.304 – Depositions and examination of witnesses
Based on agency responses from similar legislation in 2025 (HCS HB 224), Oversight assumed
this section will have no fiscal impact on state or local governments.
§537.046 – Nondisclosure Agreements in Child Sexual Abuse Cases
In response to similar legislation from 2025 (HB 709), officials from the Office of the State
Courts AdministratorOffice of the State Public Defender each assumed the proposal
will have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any
information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for
these agencies.
In response to similar legislation from 2025 (HB 709), officials from the Office of Attorney
General (AGO) assumed any potential litigation costs arising from this proposal can be
absorbed with existing resources. However, the AGO may seek additional appropriations if the
proposal results in a significant increase in litigation or investigation.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight assumes the
AGO will be able to perform any additional duties required by this proposal with current staff
and resources and will reflect no fiscal impact to the AGO for fiscal note purposes.
§556.039 – Prosecutions involving a person 19 years of age or older
Officials from the DOC state this section stipulates prosecutions under sections 566.203 to
566.211 involving a person nineteen years of age or older shall be commenced no later than
twenty years after the commission of the offense. The department anticipates this section will
have no impact. L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 15 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
§§566.151, 566.210, 566.211, and 567.030 – Criminal offenses involving a child and prostitution
Officials from the Department of Corrections (DOC) state this proposal modifies and
establishes provisions relating to the protection of children and vulnerable persons.
Section 566.151 changes the age of the victim from any person who is less than fifteen to
seventeen years of age. From FY 2022 to FY 2024, the department totaled 59 new prison
admissions and 3 new probation cases for sentences of enticement of a child. The increase in the
minimum age under which a person can be considered to be enticed as a child could create
additional instances in which a person could be charged with a crime under this section.
However, there is no available data to determine the number of 16- and 17-year-olds to whom
this could have potentially applied. Therefore, the impact for this section is an unknown cost.
Section 566.210 changes language to extend the term of imprisonment prior to parole eligibility
from 25 to 30 years for sentences on the offense of sexual trafficking of a child in the first
degree. There was one person admitted to prison as a new court commitment under section
566.210 in FY 2024. Given the minimum prison term for these sentences are already set at 25
years, this change would not start to have an impact on the department for 25 years from the
effective date. Therefore, given the 10-year time frame for this response, DOC assumes no
impact for this reporting period in this section.
Section 566.211 creates the offense of sexual trafficking of a child in the second degree by a
parent, legal guardian, or other person having custody or control of a child. The DOC does not
anticipate an impact to this section as none of the offenders sentenced in the past 3 years would
be impacted by this legislation. Therefore, no impact to this section.
Section 567.030 changes the age of the victim from less than eighteen years of age but older than
fourteen to older than fifteen years of age. The bill changes the existing class D felony to a class
B felony.
There were one new court commitments to prison and no new probation cases under section
567.030 during FY 2024. These offenses could be changed from class D felonies to class B
felonies. The average sentence length for a class D felony sex and child abuse offense is 6.6
years, with 5.3 years spent in prison. Changing this to a class B felony would extend the sentence
length to 9.0 years, with 7.3 years spent in prison.
The estimated cumulative impact on the department would be an additional 2 offenders in prison
and one less offender on field supervision by FY 2034. L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 16 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
# to
prison
Cost per
year
Total Costs
for prison
Change in
probation
& parole
officers
Total cost
for
probation
and
parole
# to
probation
& parole
Grand Total -
Prison and
Probation
(includes 2%
inflation)
Year 10($10,485)$00$00$0Year 20($10,485)$00$00$0Year 30($10,485)$00$00$0Year 40($10,485)$00$00$0Year 50($10,485)$00$00$0Year 61($10,485)($11,576)0$0(1)($11,576)Year 72($10,485)($23,616)0$0(1)($23,616)Year 82($10,485)($24,088)0$0(1)($24,088)Year 92($10,485)($24,570)0$00($24,570)Year 102($10,485)($25,061)0$00($25,061)
If this impact statement has changed from statements submitted in previous years, it could be due
to an increase/decrease in the number of offenders, a change in the cost per day for institutional
offenders, and/or an increase in staff salaries.
If the projected impact of legislation is less than 1,500 offenders added to or subtracted from the
department’s institutional caseload, the marginal cost of incarceration will be utilized. This cost
of incarceration is $28.73 per day or an annual cost of $10,485 per offender and includes such
costs as medical, food, and operational E&E. However, if the projected impact of legislation is
1,500 or more offenders added or removed to the department’s institutional caseload, the full
cost of incarceration will be used, which includes fixed costs. This cost is $100.25 per day or an
annual cost of $36,591 per offender and includes personal services, all institutional E&E,
C
hange in prison admissions and probation openings with legislation
F
Y2026
F
Y2027
F
Y2028
F
Y2029
F
Y2030
F
Y2031
F
Y2032
F
Y2033
F
Y2034
F
Y2035
N
ew Admissions
C
urrent Law
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
A
fter Legislation
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
P
robation
C
urrent Law
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A
fter Legislation
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C
hange (After Legislation - Current Law)
A
dmissions
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
P
robations
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
C
umulative Populations
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
P
rison
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1 2 2 2 2
P
arole
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
-
1
-
1
-
1
0
.00
0
.00
P
robation
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
I
mpact
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
P
rison Population
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1 2 2 2 2
F
ield Population
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
-
1
-
1
-
1
0
.00
0
.00
P
opulation Change
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1 2 2 L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 17 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
medical and mental health, fringe, and miscellaneous expenses. None of these costs include
construction to increase institutional capacity.
DOC’s cost of probation or parole is determined by the number of P&P Officer II positions that
are needed to cover its caseload. The DOC average district caseload across the state is 51
offender cases per officer. An increase/decrease of 51 cases would result in a cost/cost avoidance
equal to the salary, fringe, and equipment and expenses of one P&P Officer II.
Increases/decreases smaller than 51 offender cases are assumed to be absorbable.
In instances where the proposed legislation would only affect a specific caseload, such as sex
offenders, the DOC will use the average
Oversight notes, from information provided by the State Courts Administrator, the following
number of felony convictions under §566.151 and §567.030:
FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024
§566.151 felonies 19 25 22 24 24
§567.030 felonies 0 2 1 2 0
Oversight will reflect DOC’s impact as an unknown impact to the General Revenue Fund.
Oversight notes it would take roughly 24 additional prisoners to reach the $250,000 cost
threshold. Oversight will assume a fiscal impact of less than $250,000.
§566.218 – Restitution required for certain offenders
Oversight notes any real or personal property that was used, attempted to be used, or intended to
be used to commit a sexual offense under 566.203, 566.206, 566.209, 566.210, 566.211,
566.212, 566.213, and 566.215 may be seized. Any proceeds from the sale of the property will
be allocated to pay an order of restitution to a victim(s) of human trafficking, with any remaining
funds deposited into the Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children Education and Awareness
Fund. As the exact amount of proceeds from the sale of seized property will vary from year to
year, Oversight will reflect a $0 to Unknown impact to the Commercial Sexual Exploitation of
Children Education and Awareness Fund.
§610.021 – Sunshine Law
In response to a similar legislation from 2025 (HB 145), officials from the Office of Attorney
General (AGO) assumed any potential litigation costs arising from this proposal can be
absorbed with existing resources. The AGO may seek additional appropriations if the proposal
results in a significant increase in litigation or investigation costs.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight assumes the
AGO will be able to perform any additional duties required by this proposal with current staff
and resources and will reflect no fiscal impact to the AGO for fiscal note purposes. L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 18 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
In response to similar legislation from 2025 (HCS HB 145 & 59), officials from the Department
of Public Safety (Capitol Police), the Office of the State Public DefenderOffice of the
State Treasurer, the City of O’Fallon, the Missouri State Employee's Retirement System,
Office of Administration (Budget and Planning), the Department of Economic Development
and the each assumed the proposal will have no
fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
In response to similar legislation from 2024 (Perfected HCS for HB 1720), officials from the
Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority assumed the proposal will have no fiscal impact
on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note.
§610.131 – Expungement of certain criminal records
Based on agency responses from similar legislation in 2025 (HCS HB 224), Oversight assumed
this section will have no fiscal impact on state or local governments.
Responses regarding the proposed legislation as a whole
Officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator (OSCA) state there may be some
impact but there is no way to quantify that currently. Any significant changes will be reflected in
future budget requests.
Oversight notes OSCA assumes this proposal may have some impact on their organization
although it can’t be quantified at this time. As OSCA is unable to provide additional information
regarding the potential impact, Oversight assumes the proposed legislation will have a $0 to
(Unknown) cost to the General Revenue Fund. For fiscal note purposes, Oversight also assumes
the impact will be under $250,000 annually. If this assumption is incorrect, this would alter the
fiscal impact as presented in this fiscal note. If additional information is received, Oversight will
review it to determine if an updated fiscal note should be prepared and seek approval to publish a
new fiscal note.
In response to similar legislation from 2025 (HB 219), officials from the Department of Public
Safety - Capitol Police assumed the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their organization.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero
impact in the fiscal note.
In response to similar legislation from 2025 (HCS HB 219), officials from the Washington
School District stated the financial impact would be about $2,000 for training and
documentation updates. L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 19 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
Oversight assumes some annual training is conducted regardless of this bill and this change
could be incorporated into that training and absorbed within current resources.
In response to similar legislation from this year, HCS for HB 1464, officials from the Joint
Committee on Education, Phelps County Sheriff’s Department, the City of O’Fallon and the
Branson Police Department
respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
In response to similar legislation from 2025 (HCS HB 219), officials from the Office of the
State Public Defender
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero
impact in the fiscal note.
Officials from the Oversight Division (OD) state they are responsible for providing a Sunset
Report pursuant to Section 23.253 RSMo; however, Oversight can absorb the cost with the
current budget authority.
Officials from the Office of Administration - Administrative Hearing Commission, the
Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development, the Department of Labor
and Industrial Relations, the Department of Natural Resources, the Department of Public
Safety (Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Control, Fire Safety, Missouri Gaming
Commission, Missouri Highway Patrol, State Emergency Management Agency), the
Department of Social Services, the Office of the Governor, the Missouri Department of
Conservation, the Missouri Ethics Commission, the Missouri Department of
Transportation, the Missouri National GuardMoDOT & Patrol Employees’
Retirement System, the Office of Administration, the Petroleum Storage Tank Insurance
Fund, the University of Missouri System, Kansas City, the Jackson County Election Board,
the Platte County Board of Elections, the St. Louis County Board of ElectionsNewton
County Health Department, the Kansas City Police Department, the University of Central
Missouri, the Office of the Lieutenant GovernorOffice of the State Auditor
Missouri House of Representatives, the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules, the Joint
Committee on Public Employee Retirement, Legislative Research, the Missouri Lottery
Commission, the Missouri Consolidated Health Care PlanMissouri Office of
Prosecution Services and the State Tax Commission each assume the proposal will have no
fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the
contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
Officials from the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS) note many bills considered by the
General Assembly include provisions allowing or requiring agencies to submit rules and
regulations to implement the act. The SOS is provided with core funding to handle a certain
amount of normal activity resulting from each year's legislative session. The fiscal impact for
this fiscal note to the SOS for Administrative Rules is less than $5,000. The SOS recognizes that
this is a small amount and does not expect that additional funding would be required to meet L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 20 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
these costs. However, the SOS also recognizes that many such bills may be passed by the
General Assembly in a given year and that collectively the costs may be in excess of what the
office can sustain with its core budget. Therefore, the SOS reserves the right to request funding
for the cost of supporting administrative rules requirements should the need arise based on a
review of the finally approved bills signed by the governor.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions;
however, other cities, counties, county health departments, county recorders, nursing homes,
county circuit clerks, county collectors, local law enforcement agencies, fire protection districts,
ambulance districts, school districts, hospitals and colleges and universities were requested to
respond to this proposed legislation but did not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the
Missouri Legislative Information System (MOLIS) database is available upon request.
FISCAL IMPACT – State
Government
FY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
GENERAL REVENUECosts - §135.621 – Diaper
Bank Tax Credit p. 5
Could Exceed
($149,382)
Could Exceed
($149,382)
Could Exceed
($149,382)
Could Exceed
($149,382)
Costs – DPS/MVC -
§192.2510 – Additional
employee training p. 6($47,114)($47,114)($47,114)($47,114)
Costs – DMH - §192.2510 –
Additional employee training
p. 7-8(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
Costs – DESE - §273.410 –
Hearings held by the State
Board p. 5-6
$0 to Less
than
($100,000)
$0 to Less
than
($100,000)
$0 to Less
than
($100,000)
$0 to Less
than
($100,000)
Cost – DOC (§§566.151 and
567.030) Increased
incarceration costs
p. 15-17(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
Could exceed
($24,570)
Cost – OSCA
(various sections) increased
caseload p. 18
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown) L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 21 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State
Government
FY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
Transfer Out – to the Safe
Place for Newborns Fund
§210.950 p. 9-10
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
Transfer Out – (§210.1505)
To the Commercial Sexual
Exploitation of Children
Education and Awareness
Fund p. 10-11
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON GENERAL
REVENUE
(Unknown,
Could
exceed
$296,496)
(Unknown,
Could
exceed
$296,496)
(Unknown,
Could
exceed
$296,496)
(Unknown,
Could
exceed
($321,066)
COMMERCIAL SEXUAL
EXPLOITATION OF
CHILDREN EDUCATION
AND AWARENESS FUND
Income – (§210.1505) p. 10-
11 Potential proceeds from
orders of restitution as
provided under §566.218.2
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
Income – p. 10-11
(§210.1505) Gifts, grants,
donations
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
Transfer In – (§210.1505)
From General Revenue p.
10-11
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
Cost – AGO (§210.1505) p.
10-11
Could
exceed…
Personal Service($123,333)($150,960)($153,979)($153,979) Fringe Benefits($75,752)($92,089)($93,299)($93,299) Exp. & Equip.($21,812)$0$0$0 L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 22 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State
Government
FY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
Training and anti-trafficking
efforts(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
Total Cost - AGOCould exceed
($220,897)
Could exceed
($243,049)
Could exceed
($247,278)
Could exceed
($247,278)
FTE Change -AGO2 FTE2 FTE2 FTE2 FTEESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON THE
COMMERCIAL SEXUAL
EXPLOITATION OF
CHILDREN EDUCATION
AND AWARENESS FUND$0$0$0$0
Estimated Net FTE Change
on the Commercial Sexual
Exploitation of Children
Education and Awareness
Fund 2 FTE2 FTE2 FTE2 FTE
PRETRIAL WITNESS
PROTECTION FUND
(0868)
Cost – DPS p. 13-14
(§491.641) – Reimbursement
of pretrial witness protection
costs (Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON THE
PRETRIAL WITNESS
PROTECTION FUND(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown)(Unknown) L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 23 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State
Government
FY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
SAFE PLACE FOR
NEWBORNS FUND
Transfer In - §210.950 –
from General Revenue Fund
p.9-10
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
Income - §210.950 – from
Gifts, Contributions, Grants,
Bequests, etc. p. 9-10
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
Transfer Out - §210.950 –
Disbursed to entities that
install incubators p. 9-10
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
$0 to
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECT ON THE SAFE
PLACE FOR
NEWBORNS FUND$0$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Local
Government
FY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
LOCAL POLITICAL
SUBDIVISIONS
Transfer In - §210.950 –
Reimbursement for the Safe
Place for Newborns Fund to
install incubators p. 9-10
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
$0 to
Unknown
Income – County
Prosecutors/Law
Enforcement (§491.641) –
Reimbursement of pretrial
witness protection costs
p. 13-14UnknownUnknownUnknownUnknown L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 24 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – Local
Government
FY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028Fully
Implemented
(FY 2034)
Costs – Additional Training -
§273.415 p. 5-6
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
$0 or
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET
EFFECT TO LOCAL
POLITICAL
SUBDIVISIONSUnknownUnknownUnknownUnknown
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
Certain small businesses that have a practice that includes certain licensed professionals could be
impacted by this proposal.
Small animal control agencies, animal shelters or pounds could be impacted as a result of this
proposal due to the restrictions on inducing death in a dog or cat. §273.361
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
This proposal modifies and establishes provisions relating to the protection of children,
vulnerable persons, and animals.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Attorney General’s Office
Department of Commerce and Insurance
Department of Economic Development
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development
Department of Health and Senior Services
Department of Mental Health
Department of Natural Resources
Department of Corrections
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations
Department of Revenue
Department of Public Safety
Office of the Director
Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Control L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 25 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
Capitol Police
Fire Safety
Missouri Gaming Commission
Missouri Highway Patrol
State Emergency Management Agency
Missouri Veterans Commission
Missouri National Guard
Department of Social Services
Office of the Governor
Joint Committee on Education
Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement
Joint Committee on Administrative Rules
Missouri Lottery Commission
Legislative Research
Oversight Division
Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan
Missouri Department of Agriculture
Missouri Department of Conservation
Missouri Ethics Commission
Missouri House of Representatives
Office of the Lieutenant Governor
Missouri Department of Transportation
Missouri State Employee's Retirement System
MoDOT & Patrol Employees’ Retirement System
Missouri Office of Prosecution Services
Office of Administration
Administrative Hearing Commission
Budget and Planning
Facilities Management, Design and Construction
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Office of the State Auditor
Missouri Senate
Office of the Secretary of State
Office of the State Public Defender
Office of the State Treasurer
State Tax Commission
City of Kansas City
City of O’Fallon
Phelps County Sheriff’s Department
Branson Police Department
Kansas City Police Department
St. Louis County Police Department
Washington School District
Petroleum Storage Tank Insurance Fund L.R. No. 0356H.04C
Bill No. HCS for SS for SB 66
Page 26 of 26
April 22, 2025
NM:LR:OD
University of Missouri System
Jackson County Election Board
Platte County Board of Elections
St. Louis County Board of Elections
Newton County Health Department
University of Central Missouri
Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority
Osceola
Kansas City Election Board
St. Louis County Election Authority
East Buchanan County C-1 School District
Northwest Missouri State University
Springfield
St. Louis City Board of Elections
St. Louis County Health Department
Eureka Fire Protection District
St. Charles Community College
Fruitland Area Fire Protection District
Office of the State Treasurer
Mississippi County Recorder of Deeds
Julie MorffJessica HarrisDirectorAssistant DirectorApril 22, 2025April 22, 2025