COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:1176S.01I Bill No.:SB 70 Subject:Elementary and Secondary Education; Department of Elementary and Secondary
Education; General Assembly; Minorities; Teachers
Type:Original Date:February 5, 2025Bill Summary:This proposal allows the enrollment of nonresident students in public school
districts.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028
General Revenue*
($112,060)
More or
Less than
($60,384,937)
More or
Less than
($369,540)
Total Estimated Net
Effect on General
Revenue ($112,060)
More or
Less than
($60,384,937)
More or
Less than
($369,540)
*The amount of fiscal impact to the state starting in FY 2027 depends upon the number of
students that apply (and are accepted) to transfer to a different school district (beginning in FY
2027) and whether DESE withholds state aid for transfer improprieties (beginning in FY 2028).
Oversight notes a difference in state aid paid to separate school districts (ranges from under
$1,000 per student to over $8,000 per student). Therefore, Oversight assumes the net impact to
General Revenue could be more or less than the costs estimated for other provisions in this
proposal.
*Oversight also notes that resident school districts may still be allowed to count students that
transferred out in their weighted average daily attendance (ADA) count (used in the foundation
formula calculation). Section 163.036 states school districts may use an estimate of the weighted
ADA for the current year, or the weighted ADA for the immediately preceding year, or the
weighted ADA attendance for the second preceding year, whichever is greater. This could result
in the state paying the resident district and
However, since Oversight is unable to determine which year each school district will use in
future years to determine the amount of state aid each school district is entitled to (weighted
ADA), Oversight will, for purposes of this fiscal note, assume the savings/losses will occur
immediately.
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 1176S.01I
Bill No. SB 70
Page 2 of
February 5, 2025
GS:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Parent Public School
Choice Fund* $0$0$0
Total Estimated Net
Effect on Other State
Funds $0$0$0
*For simplicity, Oversight assumes all funds will be used within the year they are received.
Transfer In and expenditures to parents and school districts in FY 2027 net to zero.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028Total Estimated Net
Effect on All Federal
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028General Revenue0 FTE2 FTE2 FTETotal Estimated Net
Effect on FTE0 FTE2 FTE2 FTE
☒ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any
of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028
Local Government$0
(Unknown) to
Unknown
(Unknown) to
Unknown L.R. No. 1176S.01I
Bill No. SB 70
Page 3 of
February 5, 2025
GS:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
§§ 167.410, 163.161, 167.020, 167.151, 167.1200, 167.1205, 167.1210, 167.1211, 167.1212,
167.1215, 167.1220, 167.1225, and 167.1230 – Public School Open Enrollment Act
Officials from Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) assume the
following:
Section 163.161
Officials from the Office of Administration – Information Technology (OA-ITSD) state the
language states “Any school district that operates magnet schools as part of a master
desegregation settlement agreement shall not be considered inefficient for purposes of state aid
for transportation of pupils attending such magnet schools and shall not receive a financial
penalty for the magnet school transportation portion of the overall transportation budget as a
result thereof.” The transportation payment system would require an update/change in order to
put this language into practice.
Section 167.1200
DESE assumes the this provision could have a minimal impact on the foundation formula as
students would be allowed to transfer to districts that receive more state aid per pupil. DESE is
not able to estimate what this cost would be without knowing what students were going to
transfer and to which districts and is showing additional foundation formula costs as unknown.
Section 167.1212
DESE assumes this section would create the "Parent Public School Choice Fund" with
$60,000,000 to be appropriated into this fund. DESE assumes this would be a transfer
appropriation from General Revenue.
Section §167.1220
DESE assumes this section requires a hearing on the record to be conducted by the
Commissioner of Education. Based on this proposed language, the Office of Governmental
Affairs estimates costs of less than $100,000. These costs which will be dependent on the
number of hearing appeals the State Board receives from students and families, include but are
not limited to:
• Hearing officer time for hearing and drafting recommendations for the State Board;
• Administrative assistant time to schedule hearings, provide notice to parties and any settlement
negotiations;
• Court reporter costs; L.R. No. 1176S.01I
Bill No. SB 70
Page 4 of
February 5, 2025
GS:LR:OD
For cost explanation purposes, the average cost for a teacher discipline hearing is
$566.55/hearing:
• Average of 3 hours of hearing officer time x average of $58.08/hour
• Average of 7 hours administrative assistant time x $31.08/hour
• Average of $174.75 in court reporter costs/hearing.
Section §167.1230
DESE assumes this section would require the process of auditing 10% of districts participating in
the open enrollment. This would require additional FTE along with associated benefits, expenses
and equipment. The FTE required would be a Director position along with an Assistant
Director/Program Specialist to assist with oversight, payments and data collection/analysis as
required throughout the legislation.
There will be a fiscal/expenditure impact for creating/updating a data collection to account for
the new required fields. The Core Data Web Application will also require updating to the
appropriate pages to allow for adding/updating/displaying the new data fields. This was not
included in the OA-ITSD estimate. At a minimum, DESE will need to add if the school is
participating, how many students applied and how many were rejected. The student enrollment
status collection will require new fields to be added as well to identify the students for the
program. DESE will show costs over two years to allow for new data collection and testing.
Cost Estimate:
$20,000
In response to similar legislation, SB 1051 (2024), DESE stated the student enrollment status
collection will require new fields to be added as well to identify the students for the program.
DESE assumes a cost estimate of $10,000. For purposes of the fiscal note, Oversight
the cost estimate of $10,000 in FY 2026 and FY 2027.
DESE Office of Data Systems Management would be responsible for working with OA-ITSD in
making changes and identifying needed data collection. DESE assumes these duties can be
absorbed, however if multiple items are passed in this area additional FTE may be required.
DESE will seek these additional FTE through the appropriations process if necessary.
Officials from the Office of Administration – Information Technology
every new IT project/system will be bid out because all ITSD resources are at full capacity.
ITSD assumes this has potential for massive impacts to the Foundation Formula (School
Finance) application/calculations. It's unsure if these modifications would be able to be handled
appropriately by the current/existing application in place today. ITSD estimates the project
would take 972 hours at a contract rate of $105 for a total cost of $102,060 with on-going
support costs of $20,922 in FY 2027 and $21,445 in FY 2028.
Bill as Whole L.R. No. 1176S.01I
Bill No. SB 70
Page 5 of
February 5, 2025
GS:LR:OD
Officials from the Office of the State Treasurer assume the proposal will have no fiscal impact
on their organization. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore,
Oversight will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for this agency.
Officials from Osage County R-I School District assume the current state adequacy target per
student is $6,650.
Prop C per student is estimated at $1,500 per Weighted Average Daily Attendance (WADA).
Small School Revenue is estimated at $275 and $144 per Average Daily Attendance (ADA).
They estimate that each student who would unenroll would cost the district $8,569.
The 3% cap as stated in the bill would be about 5 students. Therefore, the impact could lower
revenue by $42,845.
In response to a similar proposal, SB 5 (2023), officials from the Office of the State Courts
Administrator assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their organization.
Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero
impact in the fiscal note for OSCA.
In response to a similar proposal, SB 5 (2023), officials from the Gordon Parks Elementary
Charter School stated this proposal may increase ADA funding and at the same time, may
decrease enrollment and ADA funding.
In response to a similar proposal, HB 543 (2021), officials from the Kansas City School
District stated the cost of this bill is undeterminable until families make the election. The cost of
children in a district moving out is greater than the cost for those receiving. Loss of local and
state revenue for a pupil in KC is roughly $9,000. The loss of a child or even two or three from a
classroom does not allow the sending district to reduce costs of teachers, transportation, etc.,
causing the revenue hit to not be balanced with reduced expenditures.
Holding up housing inside boundaries for children who attend a neighboring district eliminates
the opportunity for traditional and charter schools to fill seats that provide adequate trailing
revenues.
In response to a similar proposal, HB 543 (2021), officials from the Springfield Public Schools
estimated a cost of $150,000 annually.
In response to a similar proposal, HB 543 (2021), officials from the Afton School District
assumed the proposal would fiscally impact their school district but did not elaborate.
In response to a similar proposal, HB 543 (2021), officials from Malta Bend R-V School
District and each assumed the proposal would not fiscally
impact their respective districts. L.R. No. 1176S.01I
Bill No. SB 70
Page 6 of
February 5, 2025
GS:LR:OD
In response to a similar proposal from 2020 (HB 2310), officials from the Shell Knob School
District assumed this would have a negative fiscal impact.
In response to a similar proposal from 2020 (HB 2310), officials from the Wellsville-
Middletown R-1 School District assumed this bill has the potential to have a substantial
negative fiscal impact on Missouri public schools. It will make long range planning virtually
useless if a school can't realistically predict its enrollment figures for the coming years due to the
vagaries of this bill that would allow students to transfer with no usable notice to the districts.
Oversight notes this proposal allows a student to transfer beginning in the 2026-2027 school
year (FY 2028). Because DESE assumes the number of transfers cannot be estimated, and the
amount of state funding is district specific (can vary from under $1,000 per student to over
$8,000 per student, depending upon the school district), this note will reflect a potential
(Unknown) cost (if students transfer into districts that receive more state aid) to an Unknown
positive impact (if students generally transfer into districts that receive less state aid) for both
general revenue and school districts. Oversight assumes that some districts would see a net
negative direct fiscal impact, while others would see a net positive direct fiscal impact.
Oversight will reflect a $60 million appropriation from the General Revenue fund to the new
Parent Public School Choice Fund (§167.1212) in FY 2028. Oversight assumes the funds will be
used to reimburse parents and school districts for transportation costs. For simplicity, Oversight
assumes all funds will be used within the year they are received.
Oversight notes on a similar proposal, SB 5 (2023), DESE indicated the potential need for FTE
for various provisions of the bill but also note they indicated they may be able to absorb the
additional duties. DESE indicated the need for 2 FTE for this proposal. Oversight is uncertain if
DESE can absorb the additional duties in this proposal or will require the additional FTE.
Therefore, Oversight will show a range of impact for the FTE of $0 (DESE can absorb additional
duties) to the cost of 2 FTE as estimated by DESE to conduct audits.
Oversight assumes section 167.1230 states DESE may withhold state aid payments for transfer
improprieties identified in annual audits conducted by DESE. Oversight will show a range of
impact of $0 (no withholds) or an unknown savings to General Revenue. L.R. No. 1176S.01I
Bill No. SB 70
Page 7 of
February 5, 2025
GS:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028GENERAL REVENUECosts - OA-ITSD - foundation formula
changes p. 4 ($102,060) ($20,922) ($21,445)
Transfer Out – to the Parent Public
School Choice Fund §167.1212.1 p. 3$0($60,000,000)
$0 or
(Unknown)
Costs or Cost Avoidance – Difference
in state funding for resident district and
nonresident district for transferring
students §167.1205 & §167.1210 p.3 $0
(Unknown) or
Unknown
(Unknown) or
Unknown
Costs – DESE – to conduct hearings on
appeals §167.1220 p. 4$0
Less than
($100,000)
Less than
($100,000)
Costs – DESE – create/update student
enrollment status collection p. 4($10,000)($10,000)$0
Costs - DESE - to conduct annual
audits - §167.1230 p. 4
Personnel Service$0($142,302)($145,148) Fringe Benefits$0($88,619)($89,759) Expense & Equipment$0($23,094)($13,188)Total Costs – DESE$0($254,015)($248,095)FTE Change0 FTE2 FTE2 FTESavings - DESE may withhold state aid
for transfer improprieties identified by
an audit - §167.1230.11 p.4$0$0
$0 or
Unknown
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON
GENERAL REVENUE ($112,060)
More or
Less than
($60,384,937)
More or
Less than
($369,540)
Net FTE Change for General Revenue
§167.1230 p. 4
0 FTE2 FTE2 FTE L.R. No. 1176S.01I
Bill No. SB 70
Page 8 of
February 5, 2025
GS:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – State Government
Continued
FY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028PARENT PUBLIC SCHOOL
CHOICE FUND
Transfer In – from General Revenue $0$60,000,000$0 (Unknown)Expenditures – to parents/students or
school districts for costs of
transportation $0($60,000,000)
$0 or
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT TO
THE PARENT PUBLIC SCHOOL
CHOICE FUND$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2026
(10 Mo.)
FY 2027FY 2028SCHOOL DISTRICTSNonresident Districts - additional State
funding for non-resident transfers but
also additional costs to educate those
students §167.1200 p. 3$0
Unknown or
(Unknown)
Unknown or
(Unknown)
Resident Districts – reduced state
funding, but also possible reduction in
costs to educate those students
§167.1200 p. 3$0
(Unknown) or
Unknown
(Unknown) or
Unknown
Transfer In - from the Parent Public
School Choice Fund - to reimburse
nonresident districts for the costs of
special educational services -
§167.1211 p.3$00 or Unknown $0 or Unknown
Loss - DESE may withhold state aid for
transfer improprieties identified by an
audit - §167.1230.11 p.4$0$0
$0 or
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON
SCHOOL DISTRICT FUNDS$0
(Unknown) or
Unknown
(Unknown) or
Unknown L.R. No. 1176S.01I
Bill No. SB 70
Page 9 of
February 5, 2025
GS:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
This act establishes the "Public School Open Enrollment Act" to enable students to transfer from
their district of residence ("resident district") to a nonresident district.
MAGNET SCHOOLS (Section 163.161)
Under this act, any school district that operates magnet schools as part of a master desegregation
settlement agreement shall not be considered inefficient for purposes of state aid for
transportation of pupils attending such magnet schools and shall not receive a financial penalty
for the magnet school transportation portion of the overall transportation budget.
TRANSFER POLICY AND PARTICIPATION (Section 167.1205)
On or before October 1st of each year, each school district and charter school shall indicate
whether it will participate in the open enrollment program during the subsequent school year.
Participating districts and schools may accept transferring nonresident students from any other
school district. For the 2026-27 and 2027-28 school years, a district may restrict the number of
students who may transfer away from the school district to a maximum of 5% of the district's
enrollment for the prior year. The act shall not be construed to require any school to add
teachers, staff, or classrooms.
The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education shall develop a model policy to assist
school districts and charter schools in determining the number of transfers available and
establishing specific standards for acceptance and rejection of transfer applications. The model
policy shall be adopted by all school districts and charter schools, whether or not they participate
in the program, and may be modified to meet each school district's or charter school's particular
needs. The model policy shall require each school district or charter school to define "insufficient
classroom space" and may provide additional standards for evaluating transfer applications.
Nonresident districts shall accept credits toward graduation from other school districts and shall
award a diploma to any transferring student who meets the nonresident district's graduation
requirements.
Superintendents shall cause information regarding the open enrollment program to be posted on
the school district's or charter school's website and in the school district's or charter school's
student handbook.
A student seeking to transfer to a magnet school, an academically selective school, or a school
with a competitive entrance process shall submit proof that the student meets all admission
requirements. L.R. No. 1176S.01I
Bill No. SB 70
Page 10 of 13
February 5, 2025
GS:LR:OD
A student may be denied transfer if, in the most recent school year, he or she has been suspended
from school two or more times, was suspended for an act of school violence, or was expelled for
acts that school administrators are required to report to law enforcement under current law. Such
a student may alternatively be permitted to transfer on a provisional, probationary basis subject
to no further disruptive behavior based on standards that shall be developed by the nonresident
district. Students denied transfer shall have the right to an in-person meeting with the nonresident
district's superintendent.
A 9th to 12th grade transfer student shall be ineligible to participate in varsity sports during the
first 365 days of such student's enrollment in a nonresident district, unless the student meets
certain conditions as provided in the act. A statewide activities association may provide
additional penalties if the student was unduly influenced to transfer for reasons related to
participation in sports.
APPLYING FOR TRANSFER (Section 167.1210)
Students may transfer into only one nonresident district per school year. Transferring students
shall commit to attending and taking all courses through the nonresident district for at least one
school year, and at least one such course shall be in-seat. Students who transfer back to their
resident districts shall reapply in order to transfer back into a nonresident district and shall first
remain in the resident district for at least one full semester.
A sibling of a transferring student may also enroll in the same nonresident district to which his or
her sibling transfers, subject to limitations based on school capacity and the student's disciplinary
record.
Except for students who qualify for reimbursement of transportation costs as described in the act
and for agreements allowing such students to be picked up at an existing bus stop, transferring
students or their parents shall be responsible for transportation to and from nonresident districts.
By agreement with a nonresident district, parents of transferring students may waive
requirements for such a district to provide transportation required under the student's
individualized education program.
Any student who qualifies for free and reduced price lunch and transfers to an a nonresident
district sharing a border with the student's resident district shall be reimbursed quarterly by the
Parent Public School Choice Fund established in this act, based on calculations described in the
act.
PARENT PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE FUNDS (Sections 167.1211 and 167.1212)
Nonresident districts shall receive reimbursement for the costs of certain special educational
services for transferring students. Such reimbursement shall not exceed three times the district's
current expenditure per average daily attendance. The reimbursement shall come from the Parent
Public School Choice Fund established in the act. The Fund shall consist of an appropriation of
$60 million and any subsequent appropriations. The Department shall annually evaluate the L.R. No. 1176S.01I
Bill No. SB 70
Page 11 of 13
February 5, 2025
GS:LR:OD
availability and use of moneys from the fund. If additional moneys are needed to fulfill the
purposes of the act, the Department shall request such moneys by a specific line item
appropriation.
NUMBER OF TRANSFER STUDENTS (Section 167.1215)
Before October 1st annually, each school district and charter school shall set the number of
transferring students such district or charter school is willing to accept for the following school
year. The district or charter school may set criteria, including limits on the number of students to
be accepted to particular buildings, grades, classrooms, or programs. Districts and charter
schools shall publish and notify the Department of such information.
Each school district and charter school shall develop a procedure for creating a waiting list for all
transfer applications when applications exceed the district's or charter school's maximum. In
accepting students from the waiting list, nonresident districts shall give additional priority to
students in the following order: siblings of transfer students, children of active duty military
personnel, children of school district or charter school employees, students who previously
attended school in the school district or charter school as resident students, and students whose
parents' employment circumstances would cause transfer to be in the student's best interest.
Nonresident districts may also include other priority factors. Parents of applicants shall be
informed of how the waiting list shall operate and may be required to reapply to remain on the
waiting list.
APPLICATION PROCESS (Section 167.1220)
A student's transfer application shall be submitted to the nonresident and resident districts on a
form approved by the Department before December 1st in the year prior to the school year in
which the student seeks to transfer. Nonresident districts shall mark the date and time of receipt
on each such application received. Applications shall be reviewed and decided upon by the
superintendent of the nonresident district. Reasons for any rejection shall be submitted to the
school board or charter school governing body for review. Rejection decisions may be finalized
only by a majority vote of the school board or governing body.
School boards and governing bodies of charter schools may adopt a policy granting the
superintendent authority to approve transfer applications submitted after the December 1st
deadline if conditions described in the act are met, including a finding of good cause. The act
provides additional procedures related to the timing of late applications. Resident districts may
appeal the decisions of nonresident districts for suspected violations of provisions of the act
relating to late applications. The Commissioner of Education or a three member panel selected
by the Missouri Charter Public School Commission shall mediate such disputes and shall
conduct a hearing if the mediation is unsuccessful. A decision shall be issued within 10 days of
such hearing and may be appealed within 5 days. L.R. No. 1176S.01I
Bill No. SB 70
Page 12 of 13
February 5, 2025
GS:LR:OD
The superintendents of nonresident districts shall notify the parents of transfer applicants before
February 1st whether the application has been accepted or rejected. Such notice shall include, if
the application is rejected, the reason for a rejection, or, if the application is accepted, an
enrollment deadline and instructions for renewing the transfer enrollment.
AUTHORIZED EXEMPTIONS (Section 167.1225)
The provisions of the Public School Open Enrollment Act shall not supercede any provision of
an enforceable desegregation court order or a court-approved desegregation plan. A school
district may declare an exemption from the Act if the district is subject to such an order or
desegregation plan, or if the district is subject to a settlement agreement to remedy past
segregation. Such exemption is irrevocable for one year from the date the district gives notice to
the Department. Notice of a district's exemption or intent to resume participation in open
enrollment for the next school year shall be issued to the Department by April 1st. Before June
1st of each year, the Department shall report to each school district the maximum number of
transfers under the Public School Open Enrollment Act for the next school year.
When students are unable to transfer due to an exemption declared by a school district due to a
court order, desegregation plan, or segregation-related settlement agreement, such students shall
be given priority for any transfers in the subsequent school year by the resident district in the
order application notices were received from such students.
A school district with an approved or voluntary diversity plan may deny a Public School Open
Enrollment Act transfer if the district determines that the transfer conflicts with such plan.
Students transferring to nonresident districts pursuant to provisions of current law allowing
transfer if the resident district does not offer high school instruction, under the Elementary and
Secondary School District Enrollment Option Act, or through the Metropolitan Schools
Achieving Value in Transfer Corporation, shall not be subject to the requirements of the Public
School Open Enrollment Act. School districts participating in such programs shall also not be
subject to such requirements. Students transferring pursuant to the Public School Open
Enrollment Act shall not be considered transfer students for purposes of other provisions of
current law allowing transfers.
APPEAL PROCEDURE (Section 167.1230)
Students whose transfer applications are rejected may file an appeal with the Department or a
three member panel selected by the Missouri Charter Public School Commission. The appeal
shall be sent in writing within 10 days after the student or the student's parent receives notice of
rejection. A copy of the appeal shall also be sent to the superintendent of the nonresident district
where the applicant seeks to transfer. The appeal shall state the basis for appeal, shall include a
copy of the notice of rejection, and may include documentation to show that the transfer would
be in the student's best interest. The nonresident district may submit additional documentation or
arguments supporting the rejection decision to the Department or the three member panel, and L.R. No. 1176S.01I
Bill No. SB 70
Page 13 of 13
February 5, 2025
GS:LR:OD
shall submit copies of any such response to the student or student's parent, no later than 10 days
after receiving a copy of the appeal. The Department or the three member panel shall notify the
parent, nonresident district, and resident district of the basis for the Department's or panel's
decision if it overturns the rejection.
The Department shall collect data from school districts and each charter school sponsor shall
collect data from each sponsored charter school on the number of applications made under the
act to study its effects. The Department shall consider the maximum number of transfers and
exemptions for up to two years to determine whether a significant racially segregative impact has
occurred in any school district. Before October 1st of each year, the Department and each charter
school sponsor shall report its findings to the Joint Committee on Education, the House
Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education, the Senate Committee on Education, and
any other education committee designated by the Speaker of the House of Representatives or the
President Pro Tempore of the Senate.
This legislation is not federally mandated and would not duplicate any other program.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Office of Administration – Information Technology
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Office of the State Treasurer
Osage County R-I
Gordon Parks Elementary Charter School
Kansas City Public Schools
Springfield Public Schools
Afton School District
Malta Bend R-V School District
High Point R-III School District
Shell Knob School District
Wellsville-Middleton R-I School District
Julie MorffJessica HarrisDirectorAssistant DirectorFebruary 5, 2025February 5, 2025