Mississippi Senate Bill SB2298

Mississippi 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/22
• Refer: 1/17/22
• Failed: 2/1/22

Caption

Municipal election officials; prohibit removal of except where good cause shown.

Impact

This bill's passage would significantly alter the administrative framework surrounding municipal primary elections in Mississippi. Previously, the removal of election officials could vary, leading to potential inconsistencies in how elections were administered. The stipulated process for removing officials introduces a safeguard that may enhance the integrity and stability of the local electoral process. By establishing a clear requirement for 'good cause' and a formal voting procedure, supporters argue that it will minimize arbitrary or politically motivated dismissals of election officials.

Summary

Senate Bill 2298 seeks to amend Section 23-15-171 of the Mississippi Code of 1972, particularly focusing on the conduct and oversight of municipal primary elections. The bill stipulates that the municipal executive committee can only remove a primary election official after an appointment if there is 'good cause' shown. This removal can only happen through a unanimous vote by all members of the state executive committee, or through a majority vote after a recommendation from the municipal executive committee. The legislation intends to reinforce the governance of municipal elections and provide clearer guidelines on the responsibilities and authority of election officials.

Contention

However, the bill could lead to contention regarding the definitions and criteria for 'good cause' when removing an election official. Critics may argue that it could inadvertently create obstacles for municipal committees in addressing issues related to election administration, such as incompetence or misconduct among election officials. By restricting the ability to remove officials, there is concern that the bill could undermine the ability of local committees to ensure fair elections and uphold voter confidence. Balancing the need for fair governance while ensuring accountability among election officials may present challenges post-enactment.