Mississippi Senate Bill SB2373

Mississippi 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/22
• Refer: 1/17/22
• Engrossed: 2/2/22
• Refer: 2/24/22
• Failed: 3/1/22

Caption

Professional Engineers & Surveyors Licensing Board; remove provision requiring Governor to make appointments from nominees.

Impact

The removal of the nomination requirement could have significant implications for how board members are selected and may alter the board's dynamics and effectiveness. Proponents of the bill believe that it allows the Governor to appoint individuals who may not be tied to the recommendations of professional organizations, potentially increasing the diversity of experience and perspectives on the board. However, critics fear that this could reduce the representation of qualified professionals in the engineering and surveying fields, as having organizations nominate candidates often ensures that only those with suitable backgrounds are considered for appointment.

Summary

Senate Bill 2373 amends Section 73-13-5 of the Mississippi Code of 1972, eliminating the requirement for the Governor to appoint members to the Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Surveyors from a list of nominees provided by specified organizations. This change, effective from July 1, 2022, aims to give the Governor greater discretion in selecting appointees for the board, which oversees licensing and professional standards in the fields of engineering and surveying in Mississippi. The board's composition will consist of licensed engineers and surveyors, but the method of their appointment is being altered to enhance state control over board appointments.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 2373 appears divided. Supporters assert that the flexibility granted to the Governor in appointing board members will lead to a more agile and responsive board, while opponents argue that this change undermines the established process that ensures qualified professionals are appointed. Advocates of this amendment promote transparency in the governance of professional licensing, whereas detractors see it as a potential erosion of standards that might favor political considerations over professional qualifications.

Contention

The notable points of contention can be found in the debates regarding the balance of power between legislative guidelines and executive authority in state appointments. The proposed changes have stirred discussions on the potential consequences of a less structured appointment process, raising concerns about accountability and the integrity of professional standards within important regulatory boards that impact public safety and the professional integrity of engineers and surveyors. As discussions continue, the implications of SB 2373 on the board's functionality and its relationships with relevant professional organizations remain at the forefront.