Mississippi House Bill HB264

Mississippi 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/5/23
• Refer: 1/5/23
• Engrossed: 2/8/23
• Refer: 2/13/23
• Failed: 3/8/23

Caption

Energy Efficiency standards on buildings; extend repealer on statute requiring certain buildings to meet.

Impact

The proposed changes within HB 264 will primarily impact building codes and standards outlined under Section 57-39-21 of the Mississippi Code of 1972. By extending the implementation of energy efficiency standards, it aims to ensure long-term compliance and promotion of energy-saving practices within new and existing buildings. Additionally, the prohibition against restricting federally designated refrigerants aligns state law with federal standards, encouraging consistency and potentially promoting job growth in related sectors as businesses adapt to these regulations.

Summary

House Bill 264 is designed to amend existing state laws regarding energy efficiency standards for buildings in Mississippi. Specifically, this bill extends the repeal date of certain statutes requiring energy efficiency measures to be implemented during the design and construction of various building types. It also prohibits state, county, or municipal building codes from restricting the use of federally approved substitute refrigerants, thus promoting the use of these environmentally safe alternatives in construction and renovation projects.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 264 seems generally favorable among stakeholders who emphasize the benefits of energy efficiency and the adoption of modern technologies in building practices. Proponents argue that the bill supports environmental sustainability and aligns Mississippi's regulations with national standards, thus fostering economic growth in energy management sectors. However, there may be concerns regarding local governance and control over regional building practices, as state-level mandates can sometimes conflict with locally tailored approaches to building codes.

Contention

Discussions on HB 264 may reveal some contention regarding the balance between state regulation and local autonomy. While the bill's aim to streamline refrigerant use is largely seen as positive, local authorities may object to limitations on their ability to enact specific regulations that cater to their unique environmental or economic conditions. Additionally, the implications of extending energy efficiency standards could spark debate on how effectively they are enforced and the potential cost burdens these standards could impose on local governments and builders.