Mississippi House Bill HB687

Mississippi 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/23
• Refer: 1/16/23
• Failed: 1/31/23

Caption

Municipalities; establish alternative procedure to require property owners to make corrective repairs to property.

Impact

The bill modifies existing provisions within Mississippi law that allow municipalities to clean properties considered a menace to public health. By introducing an alternative process, it aims to facilitate quicker resolutions for dilapidated properties while ensuring that municipalities have the jurisdiction to enforce compliance. This could lead to improved neighborhood conditions and enhanced quality of life in small communities, as local authorities gain more control over property maintenance and public safety.

Summary

House Bill 687 provides new procedures for municipalities with populations under 10,000 to address properties deemed dangers, menaces, or nuisances to the public. The bill empowers local governments or nearby property owners to file complaints in municipal court against property owners suspected of neglecting their properties. This alternative procedure aims to streamline the process for determining property conditions that threaten public welfare. If the court confirms the property's hazardous condition, the property owner is ordered to make necessary repairs. Failure to comply may result in the property owner being assessed repair costs, which can follow the property as a lien.

Contention

However, the bill does present potential points of contention, especially concerning property rights and the appeal process. For instance, property owners have the right to appeal court decisions to the Circuit Court, but critics may argue that the enforcement mechanisms could disproportionately affect low-income individuals unable to cover repair costs. Furthermore, the implications of relying on municipal assessments may raise concerns about financial burdens on property owners and the potential for misuse of power by local governments. Advocates assert that the bill represents necessary steps toward maintaining community standards and public health, while opponents highlight the risks associated with local enforcement autonomy.