Mississippi Senate Bill SB2747

Mississippi 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/23
• Refer: 1/16/23
• Failed: 1/31/23

Caption

Chiropractic Neurologists; allow advertising as in Lee County, Mississppi.

Impact

The enactment of SB2747 is expected to have significant implications for both chiropractic practitioners and patients in Lee County. By allowing certain chiropractors to market themselves as neurologists, the bill enables these practitioners to potentially attract more patients seeking specialized chiropractic care. This move may enhance the visibility of chiropractic services in the area, thereby impacting local healthcare dynamics. However, the change may also raise questions regarding the standards for discipline and practice within the chiropractic field, especially as it relates to patient safety and care quality.

Summary

Senate Bill 2747 aims to permit chiropractors in Lee County, Mississippi, who have both a Doctor of Chiropractic degree and a neurology chiropractic degree to advertise themselves as chiropractic neurologists. This legislation seeks to clarify the legal standing of such advertising, overcoming any restrictions that might have been imposed by the Mississippi Board of Chiropractic Examiners. The bill defines the qualifications necessary for chiropractors to promote themselves in this manner, specifically requiring that they have completed an accredited neurology chiropractic program and hold valid certification from recognized boards such as the American Chiropractic Neurology Board or the International Board of Chiropractic Neurology.

Contention

While the bill is likely to be viewed positively by chiropractors advocating for greater recognition of specialty services, it may also face scrutiny regarding the implications for public health and standards in healthcare advertising. Opponents may argue that this could mislead patients about the qualifications of practitioners if advertising is perceived to elevate chiropractors to the same level as medical neurologists without equivalent training. The debate around SB2747 may reflect broader discussions about healthcare advertising and the delineation of professional titles within the medical community.