Mississippi Senate Bill SB2336

Mississippi 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/8/24
• Refer: 2/8/24
• Failed: 3/5/24

Caption

School attendance officers, State Superintendant of Education, Executive Director of Community College Board; set salaries.

Impact

One of the significant impacts of SB2336 is the formalization of a salary scale, which ensures that attendance officers are compensated fairly relative to their level of education and experience. This change not only aims to improve the recruitment and retention of competent attendance officers but also enhances the overall accountability structure within Mississippi schools regarding attendance. The limitations on the salaries of the State Superintendent of Public Education and the Executive Director of the Community College Board serve to streamline state expenditures on education administration, aiming to use funds more efficiently across the state's educational system.

Summary

Senate Bill 2336 proposes amendments to various sections of the Mississippi Code of 1972 concerning the roles and compensation structures for school attendance officers, the State Superintendent of Public Education, and the Executive Director of the Community College Board. The bill aims to establish a salary scale for school attendance officers based on their education and experience, which includes setting a minimum salary level and outlining categories based on qualifications. The adjustments to the salary structure appear designed to attract qualified personnel into these critical educational roles.

Contention

The proposed salary limits may stir some contention among educational leaders who argue that adequately compensating high-level educators is crucial for maintaining effective leadership. Additionally, while the amendments seek to enhance the operational framework of school attendance officers, there may be perspectives expressing concern over the sufficiency of funding to meet the newly set salary standards, which could strain local school budgets. Legislators and educational advocates may debate the merits of ensuring competitive salaries against the backdrop of existing budgetary constraints within the state.