Mississippi 2024 Regular Session

Mississippi Senate Bill SB2450

Introduced

2/16/24

Refer

2/16/24

Failed

3/5/24

Caption

Department of Corrections; revise certain requirements for intensive supervision program.

Impact

The passage of SB2450 will have significant implications on state laws concerning offenders' rehabilitation options. By capping the number of participants in the ISP and restricting eligibility, the bill aims to promote a more focused and manageable approach to intensive supervision. Furthermore, it mandates that the Department of Corrections maintain real-time records of program participants and report on operations, which could help inform future legislative decisions and adjustments to the criminal justice system. The intent is to ensure that those eligible for the program pose a manageable risk while still receiving the supports necessary for successful reintegration into society.

Summary

Senate Bill 2450 aims to amend Section 47-5-1003 of the Mississippi Code of 1972 to establish stricter eligibility requirements for the Intensive Supervision Program (ISP) administered by the Mississippi Department of Corrections. The bill proposes to limit the number of participants in the program and outlines specific conditions under which offenders, particularly non-violent ones, can be placed into this alternative to incarceration. Under the new guidelines, offenders convicted of violent crimes or sex crimes would be excluded from the program, ensuring the safety of citizens while providing non-violent offenders with an opportunity for rehabilitation.

Contention

While supporters of SB2450 argue that the bill enhances public safety and promotes the effective management of the Intensive Supervision Program, critics contend that limiting eligibility could restrict vital rehabilitation opportunities for some offenders who could benefit from alternatives to incarceration. The bill's focus on non-violent offenders also raises concerns about whether it adequately addresses the needs of all individuals involved with the criminal justice system. Opponents may argue that without adequate pathways for offenders who are not violent, the system risks perpetuating cycles of incarceration rather than fostering rehabilitation.