Mississippi House Bill HB264

Mississippi 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/10/25
• Refer: 1/10/25
• Failed: 2/4/25

Caption

Distinctive motor vehicle license tag; reauthorize issuance of tags displaying the emblems of public community/junior colleges in this state.

Impact

The bill imposes an additional annual fee of $50 for the issuance of these special license tags. The funds generated from this fee will be allocated in a specific manner: $32.50 will be directly deposited into a special fund under the chosen college's name, allowing the institution discretion over its expenditures. Additionally, $1 from each tag fee will support the Mississippi Burn Care Fund, while the remaining amount will go to the State Highway Fund for maintenance and construction purposes. This approach creates a financial benefit loop for both the educational institutions and the state infrastructure.

Summary

House Bill 264 seeks to amend Section 27-19-56.7 of the Mississippi Code to reauthorize the issuance of distinctive motor vehicle license tags that display the emblems of public community colleges and junior colleges within the state. The aim of this bill is to provide a means for vehicle owners to express their support for their chosen educational institution while generating additional revenue for the colleges through the sale of these specialized license plates. This initiative allows each community or junior college to have its unique emblem, which will be produced and affixed during the tag's creation process.

Contention

While the bill appears to offer a positive benefit to community and junior colleges by enabling them to generate additional funds, it may also raise questions regarding the equitable distribution of such funds and their effectiveness in enhancing educational resources. Some stakeholders may express concerns about the fairness of diverting state funds or question whether the fee is a barrier for some residents who would like to support their educational institutions but cannot afford the additional cost. However, specific points of contention were not heavily documented in the discussions surrounding the bill.