Montana 2023 Regular Session

Montana Senate Bill SB356

Introduced
2/15/23  
Refer
2/16/23  
Engrossed
3/3/23  
Refer
3/15/23  
Enrolled
4/13/23  

Caption

Require notification to sheriff of game check stations

Impact

The impact of SB 356 on state laws is primarily in the sphere of hunting and fishing regulations. By requiring the Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks to notify sheriffs, the bill creates a structured protocol for how checking stations are established and operated. This is intended to ensure local law enforcement is aware of inspections happening in their jurisdictions, which proponents argue will enhance compliance and oversight. It may also help to reduce misunderstandings or conflicts that could arise when checking stations are set up without prior notice.

Summary

Senate Bill 356 mandates that the Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks must provide notice to the county sheriff before establishing checking stations. This requirement is aimed at enhancing communication between state authorities and local law enforcement, allowing for better coordination during checks on hunting and fishing licenses, as well as the inspection of game animals. The bill amends existing law to formalize this notification process, which supporters argue is essential for effective law enforcement and public safety.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 356 appears generally supportive among legislators who view the bill as a common-sense measure that strengthens collaboration between state agencies and local authorities. During discussions, many emphasized the importance of communication in law enforcement, particularly in rural areas where wildlife-related activities are prevalent. However, there may also be some concerns raised by those who feel that additional bureaucracy could hinder the timely establishment of checking stations.

Contention

The notable points of contention regarding SB 356 could revolve around the operational efficiency of the established protocol. Some may argue that requiring prior notification could delay the department's ability to conduct timely checks, especially during peak hunting or fishing seasons. Others may question how this new requirement might impact the department's resources and logistical planning. Nevertheless, advocates maintain that the benefits of improved communication and cooperation with sheriffs outweigh potential drawbacks.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MT SF980

Conservation officers requirement to coordinate investigation and enforcement activity with sheriffs

MT SB76

Remove requirement to attach paper tags to a game animal carcass

MT SB37

Sheriffs; qualification requirements for the office of sheriff; revise

MT HF1595

Conservation officers required to coordinate investigation and enforcement activity with sheriffs.

MT HB3627

Contracts; Grocery Store Checkout Station Act; self-service checkout stations; traditional checkout stations; Department of Agriculture, Food, and Forestry; severability; effective date.

MT HB699

Allow sheriffs to have expenditure control over sheriff's office budget

MT HB648

Require FWP notification before the release of large predators

MT HB1251

Authorizes inspection stations to conduct motor vehicle inspection checks when it rains

MT HB353

Revise shed hunting requirements

MT SB113

Make permanent certain notification requirements in CPS cases

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.