Montana 2023 Regular Session

Montana Senate Bill SB381

Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Engrossed
3/3/23  
Refer
3/15/23  

Caption

Require one council member per ward of first-class cities

Impact

If enacted, SB 381 would alter the electoral structure of first-class cities, potentially leading to increased engagement and representation for communities as their populations expand. By instituting a threshold based on population sizes, the act aims to adapt city governance structures in accordance with the demographic realities of urban living. Such a change could have considerable implications for local governance, enhancing accountability and ensuring that council members can better address unique ward concerns.

Summary

Senate Bill 381, introduced by C. Friedel, seeks to amend existing provisions regarding city council composition in first-class cities in Montana. Specifically, the bill mandates that once the population of a city ward exceeds 15,000 inhabitants, the city must re-district to create twice the number of wards, whereby each ward will have a single elected city council member. This amendment aims to provide more localized representation in governance as the population in these urban areas continues to grow, thereby enhancing the responsiveness of elected officials to their constituents.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment around SB 381 appears to tilt positively among its supporters, who argue that it will strengthen democracy by promoting more localized representation. However, concerns have been raised regarding the practicality of redistricting and the administrative burden it may place on city governments, particularly those that may resist significant changes to their governance structures. Dialogue around the bill indicates a general approval for increasing representation, tempered by caution regarding the implementation process.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 381 include the logistics and feasibility of redistricting as mandated by the bill. Critics of the measure have expressed apprehension about its impact on existing council dynamics, the potential for political maneuvering in redistricting decisions, and the urgency with which cities must act to comply with the new requirements. Furthermore, some municipal leaders have questioned whether the population threshold is the most appropriate metric for determining council member representation and have suggested it could lead to unintended consequences.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MT HF4376

Cities and counties required to establish citizen redistricting commissions to conduct redistricting, certain counties required to have seven-member county boards, certain cities required to have wards, and time frame for voters to challenge redistricting plans expanded.

MT HB314

Revise compensation for members of boards, commissions, and councils

MT SF4084

Certain cities and counties citizen redistricting commissions requirement establishment, seven-member county boards required for certain counties, redistricting plans challenge by voters time from expansion, amending certain state statutes

MT HF4904

Statutory cities authorized to create wards for election of city council members.

MT HB1293

Election of city commissioners, city council members, and park district commissioners.

MT SB329

Cities: city council members: compensation.

MT SB443

Revise POST council membership

MT SF1624

Election provision of Metropolitan Council members

MT HB35

Remove appointed members & allow ex officio members on county water/sewer board

MT HF1077

Police chief in cities of the first class election provided.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.