Montana Senate Bill SB485

Montana 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/23/23
• Refer: 2/23/23
• Refer: 2/24/23
• Engrossed: 3/17/23
• Refer: 3/21/23
• Refer: 4/13/23
• Enrolled: 4/19/23
• Vetoed: 5/11/23

Caption

Raising hourly rate of legislator compensation

Impact

The passage of SB 485 will directly impact the compensation structure for legislators starting in 2025. The bill ensures that legislators receive a salary that is more reflective of their duties and the costs they incur while serving in the legislature. By tying their pay to a percentage of the governor's salary and allowing for adjustments based on cost-of-living increases, the bill seeks to improve the financial viability of holding legislative office, which may influence recruitment and retention of capable legislators.

Summary

Senate Bill 485 aims to raise the hourly compensation rate for legislators in Montana. The bill amends section 5-2-301 of the Montana Code Annotated to adjust the salary of legislators to 40% of the governor's base salary, with provisions for periodic salary increases based on a survey of other states' daily expense allowances. This change reflects an effort to align legislator compensation with inflation and prevailing rates in neighboring states, ensuring that legislative pay remains competitive and fair.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding SB 485 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that the bill is necessary for appropriately compensating public servants for their work in the legislature and addressing increasing living costs. Opponents may express concern over potential budget implications and whether such an increase in compensation is justified, especially amid broader discussions about state funding and fiscal responsibility. The debate encompasses fundamental views on the value of public service and the equitable compensation of government representatives.

Contention

Key points of contention include how the bill measures compensation against inflation and the salaries of legislators in neighboring states. Some critics may worry that raising salary figures could set a precedent for future increases, which would necessitate careful monitoring of legislative expenses. The bill also opens up discussions regarding the appropriateness of legislative pay, fairness in public compensation, and the implications of linking salaries to a percentage of the governor's compensation.