Resolution related to Columbia River Treaty
The resolution highlights the potential consequences of diverting a significant portion of the Kootenai River's flow. It mentions threats to the local environment, including increased selenium levels in Lake Koocanusa due to pollutants from coal mines in British Columbia. This increase in pollution could have serious implications for fish populations, particularly the white sturgeon, and would likely affect recreational fishing and tourism — vital sectors for local economies in Montana.
SJ16 is a joint resolution from the Montana Legislature opposing Article 13 of the Columbia River Treaty, which grants Canada the right to divert 1.5 million acre-feet of water annually from the Kootenai River to the Columbia River at Canal Flats, British Columbia. The resolution expresses strong concerns about the potential environmental implications of such a diversion, particularly emphasizing the detrimental impact on hydropower generation, aquatic ecosystems, and recreational activities in and around Lake Koocanusa, which is primarily fed by the Kootenai River's inflow.
The sentiment around SJ16 appears to be largely supportive within the Montana Legislature, as it was passed with a considerable majority (96 in favor and only 4 against). The resolution reflects a proactive approach to safeguard regional water resources and addresses community concerns regarding environmental health and sustainable water management practices. This unified legislative stance indicates a strong local commitment to maintaining control over water resources and addressing transboundary water issues.
While the resolution does not create new laws, it positions Montana firmly against potential changes to water rights established under the Columbia River Treaty. The main contention revolves around the protection of local river ecosystems against external decisions that could adversely affect Montana's water supply and the ecological stability of significant waterways. The resolution calls for its inclusion in discussions regarding the modernization of the treaty, illustrating the state's desire to influence negotiations that may have widespread impacts.