Montana 2025 2025 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB367 Enrolled / Bill

                     - 2025 
69th Legislature 2025 	HB 367
- 1 - Authorized Print Version – HB 367 
ENROLLED BILL
AN ACT REVISING WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAWS RELATING TO TRANSPORTATION; PROVIDING 
THAT WHETHER AN EMPLOYER FURNISHES TRANSPORTATION OR THE EMPLOYEE RECEIVES 
CERTAIN REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE EMPLOYER IS NOT DISPOSITIVE OF WHETHER THE 
EMPLOYEE IS COVERED FOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE; AMENDING SECTION 39-71-
407, MCA; AND PROVIDING AN APPLICABILITY DATE.”
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:
Section 1. Section 39-71-407, MCA, is amended to read:
"39-71-407.  (1) For workers' compensation injuries, 
each insurer is liable for the payment of compensation, in the manner and to the extent provided in this section, 
to an employee of an employer covered under plan No. 1, plan No. 2, and the state fund under plan No. 3 that it 
insures who receives an injury arising out of and in the course of employment or, in the case of death from the 
injury, to the employee's beneficiaries, if any.
(2) An injury does not arise out of and in the course of employment when the employee is:
(a) on a paid or unpaid break, is not at a worksite of the employer, and is not performing any 
specific tasks for the employer during the break; or
(b) engaged in an unpaid social or recreational activity, regardless of whether the employer pays 
for any portion of the activity or whether the activity occurs at the worksite of the employer. The exclusion from 
coverage of this subsection (2)(b) does not apply to an employee who, at the time of injury, is on paid time 
while participating in a social or recreational activity and whose presence at the activity is required or requested 
by the employer. For the purposes of this subsection (2)(b):
(i) "requested" means the employer asked the employee to assume duties for the activity so that 
the employee's presence is not completely voluntary and optional and the injury occurred in the performance of   - 2025 
69th Legislature 2025 	HB 367
- 2 - Authorized Print Version – HB 367 
ENROLLED BILL
those duties; and
(ii) "social or recreational activity" means an activity that is generally undertaken by individuals for 
exercise, relaxation, pleasure, or voluntary or optional preparation related to the employment.
(3) (a) Subject to subsection (3)(c), an insurer is liable for an injury, as defined in 39-71-119, only if 
the injury is established by objective medical findings and if the claimant establishes that it is more probable 
than not that:
(i) a claimed injury has occurred; or
(ii) a claimed injury has occurred and aggravated a preexisting condition.
(b) Proof that it was medically possible that a claimed injury occurred or that the claimed injury 
aggravated a preexisting condition is not sufficient to establish liability.
(c) Objective medical findings are sufficient for a presumptive occupational disease as defined in 
39-71-1401 but may be overcome by a preponderance of the evidence.
(4) (a) An employee who suffers an injury or dies while traveling is not covered by this chapter 
unless:
(i) the employer furnishes the transportation or the employee receives reimbursement from the 
employer for costs of travel, gas, oil, or lodging as a part of the employee's benefits or employment agreement 
and the travel is necessitated by and on behalf of the employer as an integral part or condition of the 
employment; or
(ii) the travel is required by the employer as part of the employee's job duties.
(b) A payment made to an employee under a collective bargaining agreement, personnel policy 
manual, or employee handbook or any other document provided to the employee that is not wages but is 
designated as an incentive to work at a particular jobsite is not a reimbursement for the costs of travel, gas, oil, 
or lodging, and the employee is not covered under this chapter while traveling.
(c) As provided in this subsection (4), whether the employer furnishes the transportation or the 
employee receives reimbursement for costs of travel, gas, oil, or lodging is not dispositive of whether the 
employee is covered by this chapter.
(5) (a) Except as provided in subsection (6), an employee is not eligible for benefits otherwise 
payable under this chapter if the employee's use of alcohol or drugs not prescribed by a physician is the major   - 2025 
69th Legislature 2025 	HB 367
- 3 - Authorized Print Version – HB 367 
ENROLLED BILL
contributing cause of the accident.
(b) For the purposes of this subsection (5), if an employee fails or refuses to take a drug test after 
the accident and if the testing procedures comply with federal drug testing statutes and administrative 
regulations applicable to private sector employers and employees as provided in Title 39, chapter 2, there is a 
presumption that the major contributing cause of the accident was the employee's use of drugs not prescribed 
by a physician.
(6) (a) An employee who has received written certification, as defined in 16-12-502, from a 
physician for the use of marijuana for a debilitating medical condition and who is otherwise eligible for benefits 
payable under this chapter is subject to the limitations of subsections (6)(b) through (6)(d).
(b) An employee is not eligible for benefits otherwise payable under this chapter if the employee's 
use of marijuana for a debilitating medical condition, as defined in 16-12-102, is the major contributing cause of 
the injury or occupational disease.
(c) Nothing in this chapter may be construed to require an insurer to reimburse any person for 
costs associated with the use of marijuana for a debilitating medical condition, as defined in 16-12-102.
(d) In an accepted liability claim, the benefits payable under this chapter may not be increased or 
enhanced due to a worker's use of marijuana for a debilitating medical condition, as defined in 16-12-102. An 
insurer remains liable for those benefits that the worker would qualify for absent the worker's use of marijuana 
for a debilitating medical condition.
(7) The provisions of subsection (5) do not apply if the employer had knowledge of and failed to 
attempt to stop the employee's use of alcohol or drugs not prescribed by a physician. This subsection (7) does 
not apply to the use of marijuana for a debilitating medical condition because marijuana is not a prescribed 
drug.
(8) If there is no dispute that an insurer is liable for an injury but there is a liability dispute between 
two or more insurers, the insurer for the most recently filed claim shall pay benefits until that insurer proves that 
another insurer is responsible for paying benefits or until another insurer agrees to pay benefits. If it is later 
proven that the insurer for the most recently filed claim is not responsible for paying benefits, that insurer must 
receive reimbursement for benefits paid to the claimant from the insurer proven to be responsible.
(9) If a claimant who has reached maximum healing suffers a subsequent nonwork-related injury to   - 2025 
69th Legislature 2025 	HB 367
- 4 - Authorized Print Version – HB 367 
ENROLLED BILL
the same part of the body, the workers' compensation insurer is not liable for any compensation or medical 
benefits caused by the subsequent nonwork-related injury.
(10) Except for cases of presumptive occupational disease as provided in 39-71-1401 and 39-71-
1402, an employee is not eligible for benefits payable under this chapter unless the entitlement to benefits is 
established by objective medical findings that contain sufficient factual and historical information concerning the 
relationship of the worker's condition to the original injury.
(11) (a) For occupational diseases, every employer enrolled under plan No. 1, every insurer under 
plan No. 2, or the state fund under plan No. 3 is liable for the payment of compensation, in the manner and to 
the extent provided in this chapter, to an employee of an employer covered under plan No. 1, plan No. 2, or the 
state fund under plan No. 3 if the employee is diagnosed with a compensable occupational disease.
(b) The provisions of subsection (11)(a) apply to presumptive occupational disease if the employee 
is diagnosed and meets the conditions of 39-71-1401 and 39-71-1402.
(12) An insurer is liable for an occupational disease only if the occupational disease:
(a) is established by objective medical findings; and
(b) arises out of or is contracted in the course and scope of employment. An occupational disease 
is considered to arise out of or be contracted in the course and scope of employment if the events occurring on 
more than a single day or work shift are the major contributing cause of the occupational disease in relation to 
other factors contributing to the occupational disease. For the purposes of this subsection (12), an occupational 
disease is not the same as a presumptive occupational disease.
(13) When compensation is payable for an occupational disease or a presumptive occupational 
disease, the only employer liable is the employer in whose employment the employee was last injuriously 
exposed to the hazard of the disease.
(14) When there is more than one insurer and only one employer at the time that the employee was 
injuriously exposed to the hazard of the disease, the liability rests with the insurer providing coverage at the 
earlier of:
(a) the time that the occupational disease or presumptive occupational disease was first diagnosed 
by a health care provider; or
(b) the time that the employee knew or should have known that the condition was the result of an   - 2025 
69th Legislature 2025 	HB 367
- 5 - Authorized Print Version – HB 367 
ENROLLED BILL
occupational disease or a presumptive occupational disease.
(15) In the case of pneumoconiosis, any coal mine operator who has acquired a mine in the state or 
substantially all of the assets of a mine from a person who was an operator of the mine on or after December 
30, 1969, is liable for and shall secure the payment of all benefits that would have been payable by that person 
with respect to miners previously employed in the mine if acquisition had not occurred and that person had 
continued to operate the mine, and the prior operator of the mine is not relieved of any liability under this 
section.
(16) As used in this section, "major contributing cause" means a cause that is the leading cause 
contributing to the result when compared to all other contributing causes. (Void on occurrence of contingency--
sec. 7, Ch. 158, L. 2019.)
39-71-407.  (1) For 
workers' compensation injuries, each insurer is liable for the payment of compensation, in the manner and to 
the extent provided in this section, to an employee of an employer covered under plan No. 1, plan No. 2, and 
the state fund under plan No. 3 that it insures who receives an injury arising out of and in the course of 
employment or, in the case of death from the injury, to the employee's beneficiaries, if any.
(2) An injury does not arise out of and in the course of employment when the employee is:
(a) on a paid or unpaid break, is not at a worksite of the employer, and is not performing any 
specific tasks for the employer during the break; or
(b) engaged in an unpaid social or recreational activity, regardless of whether the employer pays 
for any portion of the activity or whether the activity occurs at the worksite of the employer. The exclusion from 
coverage of this subsection (2)(b) does not apply to an employee who, at the time of injury, is on paid time 
while participating in a social or recreational activity and whose presence at the activity is required or requested 
by the employer. For the purposes of this subsection (2)(b):
(i) "requested" means the employer asked the employee to assume duties for the activity so that 
the employee's presence is not completely voluntary and optional and the injury occurred in the performance of 
those duties; and
(ii) "social or recreational activity" means an activity that is generally undertaken by individuals for 
exercise, relaxation, pleasure, or voluntary or optional preparation related to the employment.  - 2025 
69th Legislature 2025 	HB 367
- 6 - Authorized Print Version – HB 367 
ENROLLED BILL
(3) (a) An insurer is liable for an injury, as defined in 39-71-119, only if the injury is established by 
objective medical findings and if the claimant establishes that it is more probable than not that:
(i) a claimed injury has occurred; or
(ii) a claimed injury has occurred and aggravated a preexisting condition.
(b) Proof that it was medically possible that a claimed injury occurred or that the claimed injury 
aggravated a preexisting condition is not sufficient to establish liability.
(4) (a) An employee who suffers an injury or dies while traveling is not covered by this chapter 
unless:
(i) the employer furnishes the transportation or the employee receives reimbursement from the 
employer for costs of travel, gas, oil, or lodging as a part of the employee's benefits or employment agreement 
and the travel is necessitated by and on behalf of the employer as an integral part or condition of the 
employment; or
(ii) the travel is required by the employer as part of the employee's job duties.
(b) A payment made to an employee under a collective bargaining agreement, personnel policy 
manual, or employee handbook or any other document provided to the employee that is not wages but is 
designated as an incentive to work at a particular jobsite is not a reimbursement for the costs of travel, gas, oil, 
or lodging, and the employee is not covered under this chapter while traveling.
(c) As provided in this subsection (4), whether the employer furnishes the transportation or the 
employee receives reimbursement for costs of travel, gas, oil, or lodging is not dispositive of whether the 
employee is covered by this chapter.
(5) (a) Except as provided in subsection (6), an employee is not eligible for benefits otherwise 
payable under this chapter if the employee's use of alcohol or drugs not prescribed by a physician is the major 
contributing cause of the accident.
(b) For the purposes of this subsection (5), if an employee fails or refuses to take a drug test after 
the accident and if the testing procedures comply with federal drug testing statutes and administrative 
regulations applicable to private sector employers and employees as provided in Title 39, chapter 2, there is a 
presumption that the major contributing cause of the accident was the employee's use of drugs not prescribed 
by a physician.  - 2025 
69th Legislature 2025 	HB 367
- 7 - Authorized Print Version – HB 367 
ENROLLED BILL
(6) (a) An employee who has received written certification, as defined in 16-12-502, from a 
physician for the use of marijuana for a debilitating medical condition and who is otherwise eligible for benefits 
payable under this chapter is subject to the limitations of subsections (6)(b) through (6)(d).
(b) An employee is not eligible for benefits otherwise payable under this chapter if the employee's 
use of marijuana for a debilitating medical condition, as defined in 16-12-102, is the major contributing cause of 
the injury or occupational disease.
(c) Nothing in this chapter may be construed to require an insurer to reimburse any person for 
costs associated with the use of marijuana for a debilitating medical condition, as defined in 16-12-102.
(d) In an accepted liability claim, the benefits payable under this chapter may not be increased or 
enhanced due to a worker's use of marijuana for a debilitating medical condition, as defined in 16-12-102. An 
insurer remains liable for those benefits that the worker would qualify for absent the worker's use of marijuana 
for a debilitating medical condition.
(7) The provisions of subsection (5) do not apply if the employer had knowledge of and failed to 
attempt to stop the employee's use of alcohol or drugs not prescribed by a physician. This subsection (7) does 
not apply to the use of marijuana for a debilitating medical condition because marijuana is not a prescribed 
drug.
(8) If there is no dispute that an insurer is liable for an injury but there is a liability dispute between 
two or more insurers, the insurer for the most recently filed claim shall pay benefits until that insurer proves that 
another insurer is responsible for paying benefits or until another insurer agrees to pay benefits. If it is later 
proven that the insurer for the most recently filed claim is not responsible for paying benefits, that insurer must 
receive reimbursement for benefits paid to the claimant from the insurer proven to be responsible.
(9) If a claimant who has reached maximum healing suffers a subsequent nonwork-related injury to 
the same part of the body, the workers' compensation insurer is not liable for any compensation or medical 
benefits caused by the subsequent nonwork-related injury.
(10) An employee is not eligible for benefits payable under this chapter unless the entitlement to 
benefits is established by objective medical findings that contain sufficient factual and historical information 
concerning the relationship of the worker's condition to the original injury.
(11) For occupational diseases, every employer enrolled under plan No. 1, every insurer under plan   - 2025 
69th Legislature 2025 	HB 367
- 8 - Authorized Print Version – HB 367 
ENROLLED BILL
No. 2, or the state fund under plan No. 3 is liable for the payment of compensation, in the manner and to the 
extent provided in this chapter, to an employee of an employer covered under plan No. 1, plan No. 2, or the 
state fund under plan No. 3 if the employee is diagnosed with a compensable occupational disease.
(12) An insurer is liable for an occupational disease only if the occupational disease:
(a) is established by objective medical findings; and
(b) arises out of or is contracted in the course and scope of employment. An occupational disease 
is considered to arise out of or be contracted in the course and scope of employment if the events occurring on 
more than a single day or work shift are the major contributing cause of the occupational disease in relation to 
other factors contributing to the occupational disease.
(13) When compensation is payable for an occupational disease, the only employer liable is the 
employer in whose employment the employee was last injuriously exposed to the hazard of the disease.
(14) When there is more than one insurer and only one employer at the time that the employee was 
injuriously exposed to the hazard of the disease, the liability rests with the insurer providing coverage at the 
earlier of:
(a) the time that the occupational disease was first diagnosed by a health care provider; or
(b) the time that the employee knew or should have known that the condition was the result of an 
occupational disease.
(15) In the case of pneumoconiosis, any coal mine operator who has acquired a mine in the state or 
substantially all of the assets of a mine from a person who was an operator of the mine on or after December 
30, 1969, is liable for and shall secure the payment of all benefits that would have been payable by that person 
with respect to miners previously employed in the mine if acquisition had not occurred and that person had 
continued to operate the mine, and the prior operator of the mine is not relieved of any liability under this 
section.
(16) As used in this section, "major contributing cause" means a cause that is the leading cause 
contributing to the result when compared to all other contributing causes."
Section 2.  [This act] applies to claims for workers' compensation benefits in which the 
injury or death occurs on or after October 1, 2025.  - 2025 
69th Legislature 2025 	HB 367
- 9 - Authorized Print Version – HB 367 
ENROLLED BILL- END - I hereby certify that the within bill,
HB 367, originated in the House.
___________________________________________
Chief Clerk of the House 
___________________________________________
Speaker of the House 
Signed this _______________________________day
of____________________________________, 2025.
___________________________________________
President of the Senate
Signed this _______________________________day
of____________________________________, 2025. HOUSE BILL NO. 367
INTRODUCED BY E. BUTTREY, R. MARSHALL
AN ACT REVISING WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAWS RELATING TO TRANSPORTATION; PROVIDING 
THAT WHETHER AN EMPLOYER FURNISHES TRANSPORTATION OR THE EMPLOYEE RECEIVES 
CERTAIN REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE EMPLOYER IS NOT DISPOSITIVE OF WHETHER THE EMPLOYEE 
IS COVERED FOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE; AMENDING SECTION 39-71-407, MCA; AND 
PROVIDING AN APPLICABILITY DATE.”