Interim study to determine a use policy for the executive residence when the governor has an alternate residence
If passed, SJ45 would mandate a comprehensive study to be conducted by an interim committee to evaluate the current condition of the executive residence and propose plans for its future. This could potentially result in significant changes to state policies regarding the management of executive properties. By bringing attention to the disrepair and lack of use of the residence, the resolution aims to foster discussions that could lead to effective solutions, whether through funding for renovations, alternative usage proposals, or even the sale of the property.
SJ45 is a Senate Joint Resolution aimed at requesting an interim study to establish a use policy for the executive residence when the governor has an alternative residence. The resolution specifically highlights the pressing need to renovate the state-owned executive residence situated in Helena, which has been left vacant, incurring costs of approximately $100,000 annually without clear plans for usage or renovation. The bill emphasizes the importance of adhering to building and safety codes, including substantial updates such as new electrical systems, roofing, and heating and cooling systems.
The sentiment surrounding SJ45 appears to be pragmatic, with lawmakers recognizing the necessity for thoughtful consideration of state resources. While there is general acceptance of the need for the study, there may also be underlying concerns regarding the costs associated with renovation versus ongoing maintenance. Lawmakers are likely to engage in discussions that balance fiscal responsibility with the need for a functional and representative executive residence.
Notably, a point of contention may arise regarding the feasibility of the proposed renovations given the reported inflationary costs and delays in the construction market. Previous legislative sessions have allocated funds toward renovations, yet bids exceeded the appropriated amounts, leaving the project currently on hold. The decision on whether to push forward with renovations, explore alternative uses for the residence, or potentially pursue its sale could generate significant debate among legislators.