North Carolina House Bill H187

North Carolina 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/23/23
• Refer: 2/27/23
• Report Pass: 3/14/23
• Refer: 3/14/23
• Report Pass: 3/21/23
• Engrossed: 3/23/23
• Refer: 3/23/23

Caption

Equality in Education

Impact

If enacted, HB 187 would amend existing statutes in North Carolina by introducing guidelines that limit the promotion of what the bill classifies as divisive concepts. These include assertions about racial or sexual superiority, inherent racism based on identity, and any doctrine suggesting that individuals should feel discomfort due to the actions of others related to race or sex. This legislative change is intended to shape the curriculum and discussion methodologies used in public schools and charter schools, thereby affecting the educational landscape throughout the state.

Summary

House Bill 187, titled 'Equality in Education,' aims to assert and affirm the General Assembly's commitment to ensuring that all individuals' rights and equality are recognized within educational environments. The bill seeks to prohibit public school units from promoting certain concepts that are perceived as contradictory to the principles of equality and non-discrimination. It outlines specific viewpoints that educational institutions are barred from compelling students and employees to adopt, clearly defining these as actions that undermine the dignity and equality of all individuals.

Sentiment

The bill has elicited varied responses from stakeholders in education and advocacy groups. Proponents argue that it is a necessary measure to ensure a balanced and non-divisive educational environment, while opponents contend that it imposes limitations on teaching historical and contemporary injustices. The debate reflects broader societal conflicts regarding how race and history are approached within educational frameworks, with fears that the bill might limit open discussions about systemic inequalities.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include concerns about academic freedom and the ability of educators to discuss sensitive topics that might reflect historical truths of oppression and inequality. Critics argue that the stipulations within HB 187 could stifle important conversations and reinforce systemic inequalities by sanitizing educational content. Furthermore, the requirements for transparency and notification about instructional materials and speakers are seen as potential burdens on schools, complicating their ability to offer comprehensive education.