The bill amends Article 7 of Chapter 160D of the General Statutes of North Carolina, effectively allowing for the siting of small housing units, such as tiny houses and accessory dwelling units, within existing residential zones. This change is expected to increase housing density and provide additional options for individuals and families seeking affordable living arrangements. By ensuring that local governments cannot impose overly restrictive regulations that could hinder the development of small housing, the bill aims to stimulate housing availability throughout the state.
House Bill 474, titled 'Facilitate Small Housing', aims to enhance affordable housing options in North Carolina by permitting the establishment of small housing units in areas that are already zoned for residential use. Defined as detached single-family dwellings no larger than 800 square feet, small housing seeks to address the growing demand for diverse and affordable housing solutions. The bill applies specifically to local governments, mandating that they allow these types of structures in residential and mixed-use residential areas, thereby encouraging flexibility in housing design and availability.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 474 is positive among stakeholders who advocate for affordable housing solutions. Supporters argue that the bill represents a progressive step toward addressing the housing crisis by offering more choice in housing types and promoting sustainable living. However, there are concerns from some community members and local government officials about the potential implications of increased density in residential areas, which could lead to changes in neighborhood character and infrastructure strain.
Notably, the bill also addresses concerns regarding historical districts, stating that its provisions will not apply in those areas unless approved by local historic preservation authorities. This aspect of the bill aims to balance the need for modern housing solutions with the preservation of historical neighborhoods, though it could lead to debates over what constitutes appropriate housing development in sensitive areas. As discussions continue, the bill represents a pivotal shift in North Carolina's housing policy, inviting both support and opposition from various stakeholders.