North Carolina House Bill H910

North Carolina 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Report Pass: 4/24/24
• Introduced: 4/24/24
• Engrossed: 4/24/24
• Refer: 4/24/24
• Refer: 6/13/24
• Report Pass: 6/19/24
• Refer: 6/19/24
• Report Pass: 6/26/24
• Enrolled: 6/27/24
• Chaptered: 6/28/24
• Passed: 6/28/24

Caption

Confirm Todd Brown/Special Superior Ct. Judge

Impact

The passage of H910 will formalize A. Todd Brown's role as a Special Superior Court Judge, which means he will have the authority to preside over certain judicial matters across North Carolina. This appointment will contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the judiciary by filling a vacancy that has existed since December 30, 2021. By ensuring that qualified individuals like Brown are appointed to judicial roles, the state aims to uphold the integrity and functionality of its judicial system.

Summary

House Joint Resolution 910 (H910) is a legislative measure aimed at confirming the Governor's appointment of A. Todd Brown as a Special Superior Court Judge. This resolution primarily addresses the need for legislative approval of judicial appointments in accordance with the provisions specified in G.S. 7A-45.1(a10). The resolution outlines the appointment process, stating that the confirmation is necessary for judicial vacancies as they arise, reinforcing the authority of the Governor while maintaining the legislature’s role in overseeing such appointments.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding H910 appears to be largely positive, as indicated by the unanimous support reflected in the voting results. The resolution received 44 votes in favor with no opposing votes during its second reading, suggesting broad bipartisan agreement on the necessity and appropriateness of the appointment. Such consensus indicates a shared confidence in A. Todd Brown's qualifications and capabilities to serve as a judge.

Contention

While the bill passed without dissent, appointments like those specified in H910 can still elicit discussion regarding the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches. The process of judicial confirmations often raises questions about judicial independence and the potential influence of political considerations in appointment decisions. Nonetheless, the unanimous vote suggests that, at least for this resolution, there was a strong alignment on Brown's qualifications and the necessity of his appointment.