North Carolina Senate Bill S755

North Carolina 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/2/23
• Refer: 10/5/23
• Report Pass: 10/10/23
• Engrossed: 10/10/23
• Enrolled: 10/10/23
• Chaptered: 10/10/23
• Passed: 10/10/23

Caption

Confirm Quintin McGee, Special Sup. Ct. Judge

Impact

The passing of SJ755 is significant as it reinforces the mechanism of judicial appointments in North Carolina, ensuring that vacancies in the judiciary are filled through a transparent and formal process. This resolution not only reflects the state's commitment to upholding the integrity of judicial operations but also enables McGee to assume his duties on the bench. The resolution notes that his term of office will commence upon his appointment and will last for eight years, thereby establishing a timeline for his service and duties as a judge.

Summary

Senate Joint Resolution 755 primarily serves to confirm the appointment of Quintin McGee as a Special Superior Court Judge in North Carolina. This appointment was necessitated due to a vacancy that arose upon the retirement of Judge Stanley Carmichael on July 1, 2023. The Governor of North Carolina submitted McGee's name for confirmation, which required approval from the General Assembly as stipulated by state law. The resolution underlines the process by which judgeships are filled, emphasizing the collaborative nature of judicial appointments in the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding this resolution appears positive, particularly as it follows a clear constitutional process for judicial confirmations. Members of the General Assembly expressed support during the voting process, with a unanimous outcome indicating a lack of contention or opposition to McGee’s appointment. This consensus suggests confidence in McGee's qualifications and suitability for the role, highlighting a collaborative spirit among legislators regarding judicial appointments.

Contention

Notable points of contention were absent in the discussions related to SJ755, as the voting revealed an overwhelming support with no recorded opposition. However, the nature of judicial confirmations can sometimes trigger debates about the nominee’s qualifications or past judgments, though in this particular case, McGee's appointment seems to have been straightforward and without dispute. The absence of dissenting votes indicates that he may have had broad support due to his previous qualifications or experiences.