North Carolina 2025 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Carolina Senate Bill S339 Introduced / Bill

Filed 03/19/2025

                    GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 
SESSION 2025 
S 	D 
SENATE BILL DRS15158-ND-35A  
 
 
 
Short Title: Restore NC Bar Appoint's/Judicial Discipline. 	(Public) 
Sponsors: Senator Everitt (Primary Sponsor). 
Referred to:  
 
*DRS15158 -ND-35A* 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED 1 
AN ACT TO REINSTATE STATE BAR COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO THE JUDICIAL 2 
STANDARDS COMMISSION AND TO REINSTATE FORMER PROVISIONS 3 
REGARDING DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES FOR JUSTICES AND JUDGES . 4 
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: 5 
 6 
REINSTATE STATE BAR COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO THE JUDICIAL 7 
STANDARDS COMMISSION 8 
SECTION 1.(a) G.S. 7A-375(a) reads as rewritten: 9 
"(a) Composition. – The Judicial Standards Commission shall consist of the following 10 
residents of North Carolina: 11 
… 12 
(4) Four judges members of the State Bar who have actively practiced in the 13 
courts of the State for at least 10 years, appointed by the General Assembly in 14 
accordance with G.S. 120-121, selected as follows:State Bar Council. 15 
a. One district court judge recommended by the President Pro Tempore 16 
of the Senate. 17 
b. One district court judge recommended by the Speaker of the House of 18 
Representatives. 19 
c. One superior court judge recommended by the President Pro Tempore 20 
of the Senate. 21 
d. One superior court judge recommended by the Speaker of the House 22 
of Representatives. 23 
…." 24 
SECTION 1.(b) This section is effective when it becomes law and shall result in the 25 
immediate conclusion of the terms of each of the four members of the Judicial Standards 26 
Commission previously appointed by the General Assembly pursuant to G.S. 7A-375(a)(4). 27 
These four seats on the Judicial Standards Commission shall then be filled for new terms by the 28 
State Bar Council pursuant to G.S. 7A-375(a)(4), as amended by subsection (a) of this section. 29 
 30 
REINSTATE FORMER PROVISIONS REGARDING DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES 31 
FOR JUSTICES AND JUDGES 32 
SECTION 2.(a) G.S. 7A-374.2 reads as rewritten: 33 
"§ 7A-374.2.  Definitions. 34 
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section shall apply 35 
throughout this Article: 36 
FILED SENATE
Mar 19, 2025
S.B. 339
PRINCIPAL CLERK General Assembly Of North Carolina 	Session 2025 
Page 2  	DRS15158-ND-35A 
… 1 
(7) "Public reprimand" means a written action of the Commission issued upon a 2 
finding by the Supreme Court, based upon a written recommendation by the 3 
Commission that a judge has violated the Code of Judicial Conduct and has 4 
engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, but that 5 
misconduct is minor. minor and does not warrant a recommendation by the 6 
Commission that the judge be disciplined by the Supreme Court. A public 7 
reprimand may require that the judge follow a corrective course of action. 8 
…." 9 
SECTION 2.(b) G.S. 7A-376 reads as rewritten: 10 
"§ 7A-376.  Grounds for discipline by Commission; public reprimand, censure, suspension, 11 
or removal by the Supreme Court. 12 
(a) The Commission, upon a determination that any judge has engaged in conduct that 13 
violates the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct as adopted by the Supreme Court but that 14 
is not of such a nature as would warrant a recommendation of public reprimand, censure, 15 
suspension, or removal, may issue to the judge a private letter of caution.caution or may issue to 16 
the judge a public reprimand. 17 
(b) Upon recommendation of the Commission, the Supreme Court may issue a public 18 
reprimand, censure, suspend, or remove any judge for willful misconduct in office, willful and 19 
persistent failure to perform the judge's duties, habitual intemperance, conviction of a crime 20 
involving moral turpitude, or conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the 21 
judicial office into disrepute. A judge who is suspended for any of the foregoing reasons shall 22 
receive no compensation during the period of that suspension. A judge who is removed for any 23 
of the foregoing reasons shall receive no retirement compensation and is disqualified from 24 
holding further judicial office. 25 
…." 26 
SECTION 2.(c) G.S. 7A-377(a4) is reenacted as it existed immediately before its 27 
repeal. 28 
SECTION 2.(d) G.S. 7A-377, as amended by subsection (c) of this section, reads as 29 
rewritten: 30 
"§ 7A-377.  Procedures. 31 
(a) Any citizen of the State may file a written complaint with the Commission concerning 32 
the qualifications or conduct of any justice or judge of the General Court of Justice, and thereupon 33 
the Commission shall make such investigation as it deems necessary. The Commission may also 34 
make an investigation on its own motion. The Commission shall not make an investigation, 35 
whether initiated upon its own motion or by written complaint of a citizen of this State, when the 36 
motion or complaint is based substantially on a legal ruling by a district or superior court judge 37 
and the legal ruling has not yet been reviewed and ruled on by either the North Carolina Court of 38 
Appeals or the North Carolina Supreme Court. The Commission is limited to reviewing judicial 39 
conduct, not matters of law. The Commission may issue process to compel the attendance of 40 
witnesses and the production of evidence, to administer oaths, and to punish for contempt. No 41 
justice or judge shall be recommended for public reprimand, censure, suspension, or removal 42 
unless he has been given a hearing affording due process of law. 43 
… 44 
(a4) If, after an investigation is completed, the Commission concludes that a public 45 
reprimand is appropriate, the judge shall be served with a copy of the proposed reprimand and 46 
shall be allowed 20 days within which to accept the reprimand or to reject it and demand, in 47 
writing, that disciplinary proceedings be instituted in accordance with subsection (a5) of this 48 
section. A public reprimand, when issued by the Commission and accepted by the respondent 49 
judge, is not confidential. 50  General Assembly Of North Carolina 	Session 2025 
DRS15158-ND-35A  	Page 3 
(a5) If, after an investigation is completed, the Commission concludes that disciplinary 1 
proceedings should be instituted, the notice and statement of charges filed by the Commission, 2 
along with the answer and all other pleadings, remain are not confidential. Disciplinary hearings 3 
ordered by the Commission are not confidential, and recommendations of the Commission to the 4 
Supreme Court, along with the record filed in support of such recommendations are not 5 
confidential. Testimony and other evidence presented to the Commission is privileged in any 6 
action for defamation. At least five members of the Commission must concur in any 7 
recommendation to issue a public reprimand, censure, suspend, or remove any judge. A 8 
respondent who is recommended for public reprimand, censure, suspension, or removal is 9 
entitled to a copy of the proposed record to be filed with the Supreme Court, and if the respondent 10 
has objections to it, to have the record settled by the Commission's chair. The respondent is also 11 
entitled to present a brief and to argue the respondent's case, in person and through counsel, to 12 
the Supreme Court. A majority of the members of the Supreme Court voting must concur in any 13 
order of public reprimand, censure, suspension, or removal. The Supreme Court may approve the 14 
recommendation, remand for further proceedings, or reject the recommendation. A justice of the 15 
Supreme Court or a member of the Commission who is a judge is disqualified from acting in any 16 
case in which he is a respondent. 17 
(a6) Upon issuance of a public reprimand, censure, suspension, or removal by the Supreme 18 
Court, the notice and statement of charges filed by the Commission along with the answer and 19 
all other pleadings, and recommendations of the Commission to the Supreme Court along with 20 
the record filed in support of such recommendations, are no longer confidential. 21 
…." 22 
SECTION 2.(e) Article 30 of Chapter 7A of the General Statutes is amended by 23 
adding a new section to read: 24 
"§ 7A-378.1.  Censure, suspension, or removal of justice of Supreme Court. 25 
(a) The recommendation of the Judicial Standards Commission for censure, suspension, 26 
or removal of any justice of the Supreme Court for any grounds provided by G.S. 7A-376 shall 27 
be made to, and the record filed with, the Court of Appeals, which shall have and shall proceed 28 
under the same authority for censure, suspension, or removal of any justice as is granted to the 29 
Supreme Court under G.S. 7A-376 and G.S. 7A-377(a) for censure, suspension, or removal of 30 
any judge. 31 
(b) The proceeding shall be heard by a panel of the Court of Appeals consisting of the 32 
Chief Judge, who shall be the presiding judge of the panel, and six other judges, the senior in 33 
service, excluding the judge who is chair of the Commission. For good cause, a judge may be 34 
excused by a majority of the panel. If the Chief Judge is excused, the presiding judge shall be 35 
designated by a majority of the panel. The vacancy created by an excused judge shall be filled 36 
by the judge of the court who is next senior in service." 37 
SECTION 2.(f) This section is effective when it becomes law and applies to 38 
disciplinary actions taken against justices or judges on or after that date, including disciplinary 39 
actions taken in proceedings which began prior to that date. 40 
SECTION 3. Except as otherwise provided, this act is effective when it becomes 41 
law. 42