Transfers of charitable gaming funds; to provide a continuing appropriation; to provide for retroactive application; to provide an effective date; and to declare an emergency.
Impact
If enacted, HB 1114 will significantly impact the management of funds from charitable gaming. It establishes clear directives for how money is to be allocated, including quarterly distributions to local governments and a set amount to be directed toward gambling disorder prevention efforts. This predictable funding mechanism aims to ensure that communities directly benefit from charitable gaming activities, potentially leading to improved local services and support systems for individuals affected by gambling addiction. The retroactive application of the bill signifies a commitment to addressing past transfers and ensuring that ongoing needs are met effectively.
Summary
House Bill 1114 aims to amend and reenact provisions related to the charitable gaming operating fund within the North Dakota Century Code. It creates a continuing appropriation and establishes a process for the allocation of funds derived from charitable gaming, including gaming taxes and penalties. The bill stipulates that funds should be allocated not only for operational costs associated with charitable gaming but also for treatment and prevention of gambling disorders. The changes proposed by HB 1114 ensure that there is a systematic transfer of funds to the general fund on a biennial basis, enhancing fiscal responsibility and resource allocation.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 1114 appears to be supportive overall, particularly among those who advocate for enhanced public health measures related to gambling. Proponents highlight the necessity of addressing gambling disorders as part of a broader social responsibility. However, there may be concerns regarding the overall management of the fund and how effectively these allocated resources are utilized at the local level. The bill is presented as a proactive measure aimed at promoting transparency and accountability within charitable gaming funds, reflecting a conscientious legislative approach.
Contention
Notable points of contention regarding HB 1114 may arise from discussions about the distribution of funds and the sufficiency of allocated amounts. Critics may question whether the specified percentages effectively meet community needs, particularly in areas where gambling addiction is prevalent. Additionally, the requirement that cities and counties with allocations below a certain threshold are ineligible for payments could lead to disparities in funding across different jurisdictions. Such factors could provoke debates about fairness and adequacy in revenue sharing from gaming activities, impacting various stakeholders involved in charitable gaming operations.
Transfers from the lottery operating fund to the multijurisdictional drug task force grant fund and the salary of the attorney general; to provide a transfer; to provide an exemption; to provide for a legislative management study; and to declare an emergency.
Transfers from the charitable gaming operating fund to the gambling disorder prevention and treatment fund; and to authorize a full-time equivalent position for the department of health and human services.
The structure of the state gaming commission and the administration and regulation of games of chance; to provide an appropriation; and to provide for application.
A transfer of Bank of North Dakota profits to a water infrastructure revolving loan fund; to provide for a transfer; to provide an exemption; to provide for a legislative management study; to provide a report; to provide a penalty; to provide for application; to provide a retroactive effective date; to provide a contingent effective date; to provide an effective date; and to declare an emergency.
A housing development loan fund; to provide an appropriation; to provide a continuing appropriation; to provide for a transfer; to provide an expiration date; and to declare an emergency.
The autism voucher; to provide a statement of legislative intent; to provide for a legislative management study; to provide for a report; to provide an effective date; and to declare an emergency.
The primary residence credit; to provide for application; to provide a retroactive effective date; to provide an expiration date; and to declare an emergency.
To provide appropriations from the General Fund for the expenses of the Executive, Legislative and Judicial Departments of the Commonwealth, the public debt and the public schools for the fiscal year July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, and for the payment of bills incurred and remaining unpaid at the close of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023; to provide appropriations from special funds and accounts to the Executive and Judicial Departments for the fiscal year July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, and for the payment of bills remaining unpaid at the close of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023; to provide for the appropriation of Federal funds to the Executive and Judicial Departments for the fiscal year July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, and for the payment of bills remaining unpaid at the close of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023; and to provide for the additional appropriation of Federal and State funds to the Executive and Legislative Departments for the fiscal year July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, and for the payment of bills incurred and remaining unpaid at the close of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.