North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

North Dakota House Bill HB1145

Introduced
1/3/23  
Refer
1/3/23  
Report Pass
1/25/23  
Engrossed
1/30/23  
Refer
2/13/23  
Report Pass
3/20/23  
Enrolled
3/23/23  

Caption

Prosecution for gross sexual imposition; and to provide a penalty.

Impact

The introduction of HB 1145 is poised to impact state laws by revising existing statutes related to sexual offenses. It aims to create a more robust legal structure that enables law enforcement and judicial systems to tackle these crimes more effectively. This bill is particularly relevant in the context of ongoing discussions about the need for legal reform in areas concerning sexual assault and related offenses, indicating a legislative response to societal demands for stricter laws and better support for victims.

Summary

House Bill 1145 introduces legislation aimed at defining and penalizing gross sexual imposition. The bill marks a significant step towards addressing sexual offenses by establishing clearer legal frameworks for prosecution and penalties. Its proponents argue that the bill will enhance the state’s ability to prosecute these serious offenses and provide stronger protections for victims. By delineating definitions and penalties, it seeks to ensure that offenders are appropriately punished under the law, reflecting society's commitment to justice for victims of sexual crimes.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 1145 appears to be largely supportive, especially among advocates for victims' rights and legal reform. They view the bill as a necessary measure to address gaps in current laws regarding sexual offenses. However, there may also be some concerns about how the definitions laid out in the bill will be interpreted in practice, and whether it will adequately cover the spectrum of sexual offenses. Nonetheless, the prevailing view is that this legislation is a positive step towards enhancing legal measures against gross sexual imposition.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the definitions employed in the bill and the potential implications for prosecutorial discretion. Critics may question whether the scope of the legislation is broad enough to encompass all forms of gross sexual imposition, or whether it could inadvertently exclude certain offenses. Furthermore, debates may emerge around the adequacy of penalties proposed in the bill and how they align with public expectations for justice and restitution for victims.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

ND HB1140

Sexual reproductive imposition; and to provide a penalty.

ND SB2282

Limitations on civil actions alleging sexual assault, sexual abuse, gross sexual imposition, or childhood sexual abuse, and the notice requirement for claims against the state.

ND HB1489

Sexual assault restraining orders and domestic violence protection orders; to provide a penalty; and to provide an effective date.

ND HB1351

Sexually expressive images; and to provide a penalty.

ND HB1350

Criminal code definitions, weapons definitions, mandatory prison terms for armed offenders, and persons who are not to possess firearms; and to provide a penalty.

ND HB1254

The prohibition of certain practices against a minor; to provide a penalty; and to declare an emergency.

ND HB1492

Defining mental injury for the crime of child abuse; and to provide a penalty.

ND HB1333

State pre-emption of local laws regulating obscenity; and to provide a penalty.

ND HB1378

Criminal mischief; and to provide a penalty.

ND SB2360

Obscenity control; to provide a penalty; and to provide for application.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.