North Dakota House Bill HB1276

North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/23
• Refer: 1/11/23
• Report Pass: 2/21/23
• Engrossed: 3/3/23
• Refer: 3/3/23
• Report Pass: 3/27/23
• Refer: 3/28/23
• Report Pass: 4/10/23
• Enrolled: 4/17/23
• Passed: 4/24/23

Caption

The agriculture diversification and development fund; to provide an appropriation for the agriculture diversification and development fund; and to provide for a transfer.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1276 will create a new section within the North Dakota Century Code, allowing the agriculture commission and the department of transportation to administer the grant program effectively. The bill outlines a structured grant application process, establishing eligibility criteria and ensuring that the funds are used to support legitimate agricultural expansions or upgrades. By providing necessary infrastructure support, the bill aims to enhance profitability for farmers and ranchers and create additional job opportunities within the state.

Summary

House Bill 1276 proposes the establishment of an agriculture infrastructure grant program aimed at improving the infrastructure necessary for value-added agriculture businesses. The bill seeks to allocate funds for grants specifically directed towards road and bridge improvements as well as water and sewer line enhancements that are vital for these businesses. The objective is to stimulate economic development by increasing accessibility and enhancing the operational capabilities of agricultural entities involved in food and commodity processing, among others.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1276 appears to be largely positive, especially among agricultural advocates and stakeholders who see it as a vital step toward bolstering the state's economy through agriculture. Proponents believe that enhancing infrastructure will allow for more efficient operations and potentially increase output in the sector. However, while enthusiasm for supporting agriculture is prevalent, the discussions also noted concerns regarding the sufficiency of funding and the need for careful oversight to ensure that the grants are administered effectively.

Contention

Notably, while there is broad support for the intent of the bill, questions may arise regarding the management of the Agriculture Diversification and Development Fund. There is a stipulation that a maximum of twenty-five percent of the fund may be allocated for grants in any given biennium. This limitation may fuel discussions around prioritization and funding adequacy to meet the expected demand from various agricultural projects. Critics may emphasize the need for a balanced approach to ensure that all regions and sectors within agriculture can benefit from the fund without disproportionately favoring specific interests.