North Dakota House Bill HB1341

North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/23
• Refer: 1/11/23
• Report Pass: 2/17/23
• Engrossed: 2/21/23
• Refer: 3/3/23
• Report Pass: 3/29/23
• Enrolled: 4/27/23
• Passed: 4/29/23

Caption

AN ACT to provide for a legislative management study relating to statutory provisions that restrict the location and manner in which firearms and dangerous weapons may be carried.

Impact

If enacted, the impact of HB 1341 would be significant as it seeks to clarify and potentially adjust the legal framework surrounding firearm possession and carry laws in North Dakota. The study's examination of the existing restrictions may lead to reforms that align with recent legal precedents and public safety considerations. Notably, the bill emphasizes the need for input from various stakeholders, including law enforcement and legal experts, to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of the current statutes.

Summary

House Bill 1341 aims to initiate a legislative management study regarding the statutory provisions that restrict the location and manner in which firearms and dangerous weapons may be carried in North Dakota. The bill is intended to look into the current laws governing firearm and weapon possession, comparing them with historical regulations nationwide. The study will assess recent federal court cases concerning firearm restrictions, including issues surrounding public carry. The findings from this review are expected to guide future legislative recommendations on the subject.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1341 appears to be generally supportive among legislators, as indicated by the unanimous vote of 93-0 in the House and a favorable 41-6 vote in the Senate during its first readings. This suggests a consensus on the need for a closer examination of firearm legislation, highlighting a proactive approach to addressing concerns related to gun rights within the state. However, potential dissent may arise from advocacy groups that hold opposing views on firearm restrictions.

Contention

Notable points of contention may surface during the study as discussions around firearm regulations often invoke strong opinions. The balancing act between public safety and individual rights is delicate, and any proposed changes following the study might meet resistance from groups advocating for stricter restrictions or those fearing an erosion of gun rights. The ultimate recommendations and legislative changes could either reinforce existing laws or lead to less restrictive measures, affecting the state's legislative landscape significantly.