North Dakota House Bill HB1346

North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/23
• Refer: 1/11/23
• Report Pass: 1/27/23
• Engrossed: 2/1/23
• Refer: 2/10/23
• Report Pass: 3/24/23
• Enrolled: 4/3/23
• Passed: 4/7/23

Caption

Snowmobile registration exemption and penalties; and to provide a penalty.

Impact

The bill modifies Section 39-24-04 and Section 39-24-11 of the North Dakota Century Code. By requiring the purchase of a permit, the bill aims to streamline access to public trails while ensuring that revenue is generated for the maintenance and development of snowmobile trails. The changes encourage recreational use of snowmobiles within the state while promoting compliance with state regulations, thus reinforcing state law in the management of snowmobiles in public areas.

Summary

House Bill 1346 aims to amend existing laws regarding snowmobile registration in North Dakota, specifically focusing on exemptions from registration and outlining associated penalties for violations. The bill establishes that owners of certain exempt snowmobiles must purchase an out-of-state public trails and lands access permit for $25 annually. This fee is intended to be used for state snowmobile fund initiatives, with a portion retained by authorized dealers selling these permits.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1346 appears to be generally positive among lawmakers who see it as a necessary adjustment to improve governance over snowmobile use and enhance public access to recreational trails. The bill has received broad support, as indicated by voting outcomes, suggesting that many legislators recognize the potential benefits of improving trail maintenance funding through permit fees. However, further discussions may touch on concerns regarding the cost and accessibility of fees for certain user groups.

Contention

Notable points of contention may include discussions on the appropriateness of the set fee and the implications it has for snowmobile users, particularly those who may be exempt from registration due to specific circumstances. Some stakeholders may argue about the fairness and accessibility of the permit system, ensuring it does not discourage recreational use among lower-income residents. Nonetheless, the overall consensus reflects a commitment to balancing recreational enjoyment with responsible regulation.