North Dakota Senate Bill SB2168

North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/23
• Refer: 1/9/23
• Report Pass: 1/20/23
• Engrossed: 1/24/23
• Refer: 2/17/23
• Report Pass: 4/7/23

Caption

Speeding violations, use of safety belts, and city fines and penalties; and to provide a penalty.

Impact

The bill's impact on state laws is primarily focused on enhancing the punitive measures against traffic violations, particularly speeding. The reforms intend to standardize missed safety measures, such as the enforcement of safety belt usage and the penalties associated with noncompliance. By amending existing laws, SB2168 seeks to deter traffic violations through increased financial penalties, thereby fostering a safer driving environment across North Dakota. It is also noteworthy that local governments will have increased latitude in setting their penalties, up to a defined limit.

Summary

Senate Bill 2168 addresses amendments to the North Dakota Century Code pertaining to speeding violations, use of safety belts, and city fines and penalties. The bill establishes a detailed structure for fees associated with moving and nonmoving violations, significantly adjusting the penalties based on the speed over the limit. For instance, penalties can increase substantially for violations that exceed the speed limit by 45 mph or more, with fees specified for various ranges of exceeding speeds. The adjustments aim to reinforce traffic laws and promote road safety.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB2168 appears to skew positive among proponents who advocate for stricter traffic regulation as a means of improving public safety and reducing road accidents. However, there exists a contrasting view that questions the fairness of increased fees and potential burdens on drivers, particularly for minor speeding infractions. This divergence signifies a broader discussion about the balance between enforcement measures and community tolerance of penalties.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns that the increased penalties may disproportionately affect low-income drivers and lead to further issues regarding traffic compliance. Critics might argue that while the intent is to enhance road safety, the resultant financial strain on individuals could foster resentment and noncompliance. Additionally, some may feel that local governments having the ability to dictate penalties introduces variability that could confuse or mislead drivers about the consequences of their actions on the road.